如何设置、清除和切换一点?


当前回答

下面是我使用的一些宏:

SET_FLAG(Status, Flag)            ((Status) |= (Flag))
CLEAR_FLAG(Status, Flag)          ((Status) &= ~(Flag))
INVALID_FLAGS(ulFlags, ulAllowed) ((ulFlags) & ~(ulAllowed))
TEST_FLAGS(t,ulMask, ulBit)       (((t)&(ulMask)) == (ulBit))
IS_FLAG_SET(t,ulMask)             TEST_FLAGS(t,ulMask,ulMask)
IS_FLAG_CLEAR(t,ulMask)           TEST_FLAGS(t,ulMask,0)

其他回答

将第n位设置为x(位值),不使用-1

有时,当您不确定-1或类似的结果时,您可能希望在不使用-1的情况下设置第n位:

number = (((number | (1 << n)) ^ (1 << n))) | (x << n);

解释:((number |(1<<n)将第n位设置为1(其中|表示逐位OR),然后使用(…)^(1<<n)将将第n个位设置为0,最后通过(…)|x<<n,将第n比特设置为0(位值)x。

这也适用于戈朗。

模板版本(放在头文件中),支持更改多位(适用于AVR微控制器btw):

namespace bit {
  template <typename T1, typename T2>
  constexpr inline T1 bitmask(T2 bit) 
  {return (T1)1 << bit;}
  template <typename T1, typename T3, typename ...T2>
  constexpr inline T1 bitmask(T3 bit, T2 ...bits) 
  {return ((T1)1 << bit) | bitmask<T1>(bits...);}

  /** Set these bits (others retain their state) */
  template <typename T1, typename ...T2>
  constexpr inline void set (T1 &variable, T2 ...bits) 
  {variable |= bitmask<T1>(bits...);}
  /** Set only these bits (others will be cleared) */
  template <typename T1, typename ...T2>
  constexpr inline void setOnly (T1 &variable, T2 ...bits) 
  {variable = bitmask<T1>(bits...);}
  /** Clear these bits (others retain their state) */
  template <typename T1, typename ...T2>
  constexpr inline void clear (T1 &variable, T2 ...bits) 
  {variable &= ~bitmask<T1>(bits...);}
  /** Flip these bits (others retain their state) */
  template <typename T1, typename ...T2>
  constexpr inline void flip (T1 &variable, T2 ...bits) 
  {variable ^= bitmask<T1>(bits...);}
  /** Check if any of these bits are set */
  template <typename T1, typename ...T2>
  constexpr inline bool isAnySet(const T1 &variable, T2 ...bits) 
  {return variable & bitmask<T1>(bits...);}
  /** Check if all these bits are set */
  template <typename T1, typename ...T2>
  constexpr inline bool isSet (const T1 &variable, T2 ...bits) 
  {return ((variable & bitmask<T1>(bits...)) == bitmask<T1>(bits...));}
  /** Check if all these bits are not set */
  template <typename T1, typename ...T2>
  constexpr inline bool isNotSet (const T1 &variable, T2 ...bits) 
  {return ((variable & bitmask<T1>(bits...)) != bitmask<T1>(bits...));}
}

使用示例:

#include <iostream>
#include <bitset> // for console output of binary values

// and include the code above of course

using namespace std;

int main() {
  uint8_t v = 0b1111'1100;
  bit::set(v, 0);
  cout << bitset<8>(v) << endl;

  bit::clear(v, 0,1);
  cout << bitset<8>(v) << endl;

  bit::flip(v, 0,1);
  cout << bitset<8>(v) << endl;

  bit::clear(v, 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7);
  cout << bitset<8>(v) << endl;

  bit::flip(v, 0,7);
  cout << bitset<8>(v) << endl;
}

BTW:如果不向编译器发送优化器参数(例如:-O3),则不使用constexpr和inline。请随时尝试以下代码https://godbolt.org/并查看ASM输出。

由于这被标记为“嵌入式”,我假设您使用的是微控制器。以上所有建议都是有效的&有效的(读、修改、写、联合、结构等)。

然而,在一场基于示波器的调试中,我惊奇地发现,与直接将值写入微控制器的PORTnSET/PORTnCLEAR寄存器相比,这些方法在CPU周期中具有相当大的开销,这在存在紧密环路/高频ISR的切换引脚的情况下产生了真正的差异。

对于那些不熟悉的人:在我的示例中,micro有一个反映输出引脚的通用引脚状态寄存器PORTn,因此执行PORTn |=BIT_TO_SET会导致对该寄存器的读-修改-写入。然而,PORTnSET/PORTnCLEAR寄存器取“1”表示“请将此位置为1”(SET)或“请将该位置为零”(CLEAR),取“0”表示“不使用管脚”。因此,您最终会得到两个端口地址,这取决于您是设置还是清除位(并不总是方便),但反应更快,汇编代码更小。

如果你在做很多无聊的事情,你可能会想使用口罩,这会让整个事情变得更快。以下函数速度非常快,而且仍然灵活(它们允许在任何大小的位图中进行位旋转)。

const unsigned char TQuickByteMask[8] =
{
   0x01, 0x02, 0x04, 0x08,
   0x10, 0x20, 0x40, 0x80,
};


/** Set bit in any sized bit mask.
 *
 * @return    none
 *
 * @param     bit    - Bit number.
 * @param     bitmap - Pointer to bitmap.
 */
void TSetBit( short bit, unsigned char *bitmap)
{
    short n, x;

    x = bit / 8;        // Index to byte.
    n = bit % 8;        // Specific bit in byte.

    bitmap[x] |= TQuickByteMask[n];        // Set bit.
}


/** Reset bit in any sized mask.
 *
 * @return  None
 *
 * @param   bit    - Bit number.
 * @param   bitmap - Pointer to bitmap.
 */
void TResetBit( short bit, unsigned char *bitmap)
{
    short n, x;

    x = bit / 8;        // Index to byte.
    n = bit % 8;        // Specific bit in byte.

    bitmap[x] &= (~TQuickByteMask[n]);    // Reset bit.
}


/** Toggle bit in any sized bit mask.
 *
 * @return   none
 *
 * @param   bit    - Bit number.
 * @param   bitmap - Pointer to bitmap.
 */
void TToggleBit( short bit, unsigned char *bitmap)
{
    short n, x;

    x = bit / 8;        // Index to byte.
    n = bit % 8;        // Specific bit in byte.

    bitmap[x] ^= TQuickByteMask[n];        // Toggle bit.
}


/** Checks specified bit.
 *
 * @return  1 if bit set else 0.
 *
 * @param   bit    - Bit number.
 * @param   bitmap - Pointer to bitmap.
 */
short TIsBitSet( short bit, const unsigned char *bitmap)
{
    short n, x;

    x = bit / 8;    // Index to byte.
    n = bit % 8;    // Specific bit in byte.

    // Test bit (logigal AND).
    if (bitmap[x] & TQuickByteMask[n])
        return 1;

    return 0;
}


/** Checks specified bit.
 *
 * @return  1 if bit reset else 0.
 *
 * @param   bit    - Bit number.
 * @param   bitmap - Pointer to bitmap.
 */
short TIsBitReset( short bit, const unsigned char *bitmap)
{
    return TIsBitSet(bit, bitmap) ^ 1;
}


/** Count number of bits set in a bitmap.
 *
 * @return   Number of bits set.
 *
 * @param    bitmap - Pointer to bitmap.
 * @param    size   - Bitmap size (in bits).
 *
 * @note    Not very efficient in terms of execution speed. If you are doing
 *        some computationally intense stuff you may need a more complex
 *        implementation which would be faster (especially for big bitmaps).
 *        See (http://graphics.stanford.edu/~seander/bithacks.html).
 */
int TCountBits( const unsigned char *bitmap, int size)
{
    int i, count = 0;

    for (i=0; i<size; i++)
        if (TIsBitSet(i, bitmap))
            count++;

    return count;
}

注意,要在16位整数中设置位“n”,请执行以下操作:

TSetBit( n, &my_int);

这取决于你确保比特数在你通过的位图范围内。请注意,对于字节、字、dword、qword等的小端处理器,它们在内存中正确地相互映射(小端处理器比大端处理器“更好”的主要原因,啊,我感觉到一场火焰大战即将到来…)。

检查任意类型变量中任意位置的位:

#define bit_test(x, y)  ( ( ((const char*)&(x))[(y)>>3] & 0x80 >> ((y)&0x07)) >> (7-((y)&0x07) ) )

示例用法:

int main(void)
{
    unsigned char arr[8] = { 0x01, 0x23, 0x45, 0x67, 0x89, 0xAB, 0xCD, 0xEF };

    for (int ix = 0; ix < 64; ++ix)
        printf("bit %d is %d\n", ix, bit_test(arr, ix));

    return 0;
}

笔记:这是设计为快速(考虑到其灵活性)和非分支。当编译Sun Studio 8时,它会产生高效的SPARC机器代码;我还在amd64上使用MSVC++2008测试了它。可以制作类似的宏来设置和清除位。与其他解决方案相比,此解决方案的关键区别在于它适用于几乎任何类型的变量中的任何位置。