两者有什么区别
引用传递的参数 参数通过value?
你能给我举几个例子吗?
两者有什么区别
引用传递的参数 参数通过value?
你能给我举几个例子吗?
当前回答
按值传递是指如何通过使用参数将值传递给函数。在按值传递中,我们复制存储在指定变量中的数据,并且它比按引用传递慢,因为数据是复制的。
或者我们对复制的数据进行更改。不影响原有数据。在按引用传递或按地址传递中,我们发送一个直接链接到变量本身。或者传递一个指向变量的指针。它更快是因为消耗的时间更少。
其他回答
A major difference between them is that value-type variables store values, so specifying a value-type variable in a method call passes a copy of that variable's value to the method. Reference-type variables store references to objects, so specifying a reference-type variable as an argument passes the method a copy of the actual reference that refers to the object. Even though the reference itself is passed by value, the method can still use the reference it receives to interact with—and possibly modify—the original object. Similarly, when returning information from a method via a return statement, the method returns a copy of the value stored in a value-type variable or a copy of the reference stored in a reference-type variable. When a reference is returned, the calling method can use that reference to interact with the referenced object. So, in effect, objects are always passed by reference.
In c#, to pass a variable by reference so the called method can modify the variable's, C# provides keywords ref and out. Applying the ref keyword to a parameter declaration allows you to pass a variable to a method by reference—the called method will be able to modify the original variable in the caller. The ref keyword is used for variables that already have been initialized in the calling method. Normally, when a method call contains an uninitialized variable as an argument, the compiler generates an error. Preceding a parameter with keyword out creates an output parameter. This indicates to the compiler that the argument will be passed into the called method by reference and that the called method will assign a value to the original variable in the caller. If the method does not assign a value to the output parameter in every possible path of execution, the compiler generates an error. This also prevents the compiler from generating an error message for an uninitialized variable that is passed as an argument to a method. A method can return only one value to its caller via a return statement, but can return many values by specifying multiple output (ref and/or out) parameters.
请参阅c#讨论和示例链接文本
“按值传递”将发送存储在指定变量中的数据的副本,“按引用传递”将发送到变量本身的直接链接。
因此,如果你通过引用传递一个变量,然后改变你传递给它的块中的变量,原始变量将被改变。如果只是按值传递,原始变量将不能被传递到的块所改变,但您将获得调用时它所包含的任何内容的副本。
It's a way how to pass arguments to functions. Passing by reference means the called functions' parameter will be the same as the callers' passed argument (not the value, but the identity - the variable itself). Pass by value means the called functions' parameter will be a copy of the callers' passed argument. The value will be the same, but the identity - the variable - is different. Thus changes to a parameter done by the called function in one case changes the argument passed and in the other case just changes the value of the parameter in the called function (which is only a copy). In a quick hurry:
Java only supports pass by value. Always copies arguments, even though when copying a reference to an object, the parameter in the called function will point to the same object and changes to that object will be see in the caller. Since this can be confusing, here is what Jon Skeet has to say about this. C# supports pass by value and pass by reference (keyword ref used at caller and called function). Jon Skeet also has a nice explanation of this here. C++ supports pass by value and pass by reference (reference parameter type used at called function). You will find an explanation of this below.
代码
因为我的语言是c++,我将在这里使用它
// passes a pointer (called reference in java) to an integer
void call_by_value(int *p) { // :1
p = NULL;
}
// passes an integer
void call_by_value(int p) { // :2
p = 42;
}
// passes an integer by reference
void call_by_reference(int & p) { // :3
p = 42;
}
// this is the java style of passing references. NULL is called "null" there.
void call_by_value_special(int *p) { // :4
*p = 10; // changes what p points to ("what p references" in java)
// only changes the value of the parameter, but *not* of
// the argument passed by the caller. thus it's pass-by-value:
p = NULL;
}
int main() {
int value = 10;
int * pointer = &value;
call_by_value(pointer); // :1
assert(pointer == &value); // pointer was copied
call_by_value(value); // :2
assert(value == 10); // value was copied
call_by_reference(value); // :3
assert(value == 42); // value was passed by reference
call_by_value_special(pointer); // :4
// pointer was copied but what pointer references was changed.
assert(value == 10 && pointer == &value);
}
Java中的一个例子不会有什么坏处:
class Example {
int value = 0;
// similar to :4 case in the c++ example
static void accept_reference(Example e) { // :1
e.value++; // will change the referenced object
e = null; // will only change the parameter
}
// similar to the :2 case in the c++ example
static void accept_primitive(int v) { // :2
v++; // will only change the parameter
}
public static void main(String... args) {
int value = 0;
Example ref = new Example(); // reference
// note what we pass is the reference, not the object. we can't
// pass objects. The reference is copied (pass-by-value).
accept_reference(ref); // :1
assert ref != null && ref.value == 1;
// the primitive int variable is copied
accept_primitive(value); // :2
assert value == 0;
}
}
维基百科
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pass_by_reference#Call_by_value
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pass_by_reference#Call_by_reference
这家伙说得很准:
http://javadude.com/articles/passbyvalue.htm
问题是“vs”。
没有人指出一个重要的点。在传递值时,会占用额外的内存来存储传递的变量值。
在传递引用时,值不会占用额外的内存(在某些情况下内存是有效的)。
例子:
class Dog
{
public:
barkAt( const std::string& pOtherDog ); // const reference
barkAt( std::string pOtherDog ); // value
};
Const &通常是最好的。你不会受到建造和破坏的惩罚。如果引用不是const,你的接口暗示它将改变传入的数据。