我需要一个基本函数来求点到线段的最短距离。你可以随意用任何你想要的语言来编写解决方案;我可以把它翻译成什么我正在使用(Javascript)。
编辑:线段由两个端点定义。线段AB由两点A (x1,y1)和B (x2,y2)定义。我要求的是这条线段到点C (x3,y3)的距离。我的几何技能生疏了,所以我看到的例子让我很困惑,我很遗憾地承认。
我需要一个基本函数来求点到线段的最短距离。你可以随意用任何你想要的语言来编写解决方案;我可以把它翻译成什么我正在使用(Javascript)。
编辑:线段由两个端点定义。线段AB由两点A (x1,y1)和B (x2,y2)定义。我要求的是这条线段到点C (x3,y3)的距离。我的几何技能生疏了,所以我看到的例子让我很困惑,我很遗憾地承认。
当前回答
这里它使用Swift
/* Distance from a point (p1) to line l1 l2 */
func distanceFromPoint(p: CGPoint, toLineSegment l1: CGPoint, and l2: CGPoint) -> CGFloat {
let A = p.x - l1.x
let B = p.y - l1.y
let C = l2.x - l1.x
let D = l2.y - l1.y
let dot = A * C + B * D
let len_sq = C * C + D * D
let param = dot / len_sq
var xx, yy: CGFloat
if param < 0 || (l1.x == l2.x && l1.y == l2.y) {
xx = l1.x
yy = l1.y
} else if param > 1 {
xx = l2.x
yy = l2.y
} else {
xx = l1.x + param * C
yy = l1.y + param * D
}
let dx = p.x - xx
let dy = p.y - yy
return sqrt(dx * dx + dy * dy)
}
其他回答
本想在GLSL中这样做,但如果可能的话,最好避免所有这些条件。使用clamp()可以避免两种端点情况:
// find closest point to P on line segment AB:
vec3 closest_point_on_line_segment(in vec3 P, in vec3 A, in vec3 B) {
vec3 AP = P - A, AB = B - A;
float l = dot(AB, AB);
if (l <= 0.0000001) return A; // A and B are practically the same
return AP - AB*clamp(dot(AP, AB)/l, 0.0, 1.0); // do the projection
}
如果您可以确定A和B彼此不会非常接近,则可以简化为删除If()。事实上,即使A和B是相同的,我的GPU仍然给出了这个无条件版本的正确结果(但这是使用pre-OpenGL 4.1,其中GLSL除零是未定义的):
// find closest point to P on line segment AB:
vec3 closest_point_on_line_segment(in vec3 P, in vec3 A, in vec3 B) {
vec3 AP = P - A, AB = B - A;
return AP - AB*clamp(dot(AP, AB)/dot(AB, AB), 0.0, 1.0);
}
计算距离是很简单的——GLSL提供了一个distance()函数,你可以在这个最近的点和P。
灵感来自Iñigo Quilez的胶囊距离函数代码
Consider this modification to Grumdrig's answer above. Many times you'll find that floating point imprecision can cause problems. I'm using doubles in the version below, but you can easily change to floats. The important part is that it uses an epsilon to handle the "slop". In addition, you'll many times want to know WHERE the intersection happened, or if it happened at all. If the returned t is < 0.0 or > 1.0, no collision occurred. However, even if no collision occurred, many times you'll want to know where the closest point on the segment to P is, and thus I use qx and qy to return this location.
double PointSegmentDistanceSquared( double px, double py,
double p1x, double p1y,
double p2x, double p2y,
double& t,
double& qx, double& qy)
{
static const double kMinSegmentLenSquared = 0.00000001; // adjust to suit. If you use float, you'll probably want something like 0.000001f
static const double kEpsilon = 1.0E-14; // adjust to suit. If you use floats, you'll probably want something like 1E-7f
double dx = p2x - p1x;
double dy = p2y - p1y;
double dp1x = px - p1x;
double dp1y = py - p1y;
const double segLenSquared = (dx * dx) + (dy * dy);
if (segLenSquared >= -kMinSegmentLenSquared && segLenSquared <= kMinSegmentLenSquared)
{
// segment is a point.
qx = p1x;
qy = p1y;
t = 0.0;
return ((dp1x * dp1x) + (dp1y * dp1y));
}
else
{
// Project a line from p to the segment [p1,p2]. By considering the line
// extending the segment, parameterized as p1 + (t * (p2 - p1)),
// we find projection of point p onto the line.
// It falls where t = [(p - p1) . (p2 - p1)] / |p2 - p1|^2
t = ((dp1x * dx) + (dp1y * dy)) / segLenSquared;
if (t < kEpsilon)
{
// intersects at or to the "left" of first segment vertex (p1x, p1y). If t is approximately 0.0, then
// intersection is at p1. If t is less than that, then there is no intersection (i.e. p is not within
// the 'bounds' of the segment)
if (t > -kEpsilon)
{
// intersects at 1st segment vertex
t = 0.0;
}
// set our 'intersection' point to p1.
qx = p1x;
qy = p1y;
// Note: If you wanted the ACTUAL intersection point of where the projected lines would intersect if
// we were doing PointLineDistanceSquared, then qx would be (p1x + (t * dx)) and qy would be (p1y + (t * dy)).
}
else if (t > (1.0 - kEpsilon))
{
// intersects at or to the "right" of second segment vertex (p2x, p2y). If t is approximately 1.0, then
// intersection is at p2. If t is greater than that, then there is no intersection (i.e. p is not within
// the 'bounds' of the segment)
if (t < (1.0 + kEpsilon))
{
// intersects at 2nd segment vertex
t = 1.0;
}
// set our 'intersection' point to p2.
qx = p2x;
qy = p2y;
// Note: If you wanted the ACTUAL intersection point of where the projected lines would intersect if
// we were doing PointLineDistanceSquared, then qx would be (p1x + (t * dx)) and qy would be (p1y + (t * dy)).
}
else
{
// The projection of the point to the point on the segment that is perpendicular succeeded and the point
// is 'within' the bounds of the segment. Set the intersection point as that projected point.
qx = p1x + (t * dx);
qy = p1y + (t * dy);
}
// return the squared distance from p to the intersection point. Note that we return the squared distance
// as an optimization because many times you just need to compare relative distances and the squared values
// works fine for that. If you want the ACTUAL distance, just take the square root of this value.
double dpqx = px - qx;
double dpqy = py - qy;
return ((dpqx * dpqx) + (dpqy * dpqy));
}
}
在javascript中使用几何:
var a = { x:20, y:20};//start segment
var b = { x:40, y:30};//end segment
var c = { x:37, y:14};//point
// magnitude from a to c
var ac = Math.sqrt( Math.pow( ( a.x - c.x ), 2 ) + Math.pow( ( a.y - c.y ), 2) );
// magnitude from b to c
var bc = Math.sqrt( Math.pow( ( b.x - c.x ), 2 ) + Math.pow( ( b.y - c.y ), 2 ) );
// magnitude from a to b (base)
var ab = Math.sqrt( Math.pow( ( a.x - b.x ), 2 ) + Math.pow( ( a.y - b.y ), 2 ) );
// perimeter of triangle
var p = ac + bc + ab;
// area of the triangle
var area = Math.sqrt( p/2 * ( p/2 - ac) * ( p/2 - bc ) * ( p/2 - ab ) );
// height of the triangle = distance
var h = ( area * 2 ) / ab;
console.log ("height: " + h);
看起来几乎每个人都在StackOverflow上贡献了一个答案(目前为止有23个答案),所以这里是我对c#的贡献。这主要是基于M. Katz的回答,而Katz的回答又基于Grumdrig的回答。
public struct MyVector
{
private readonly double _x, _y;
// Constructor
public MyVector(double x, double y)
{
_x = x;
_y = y;
}
// Distance from this point to another point, squared
private double DistanceSquared(MyVector otherPoint)
{
double dx = otherPoint._x - this._x;
double dy = otherPoint._y - this._y;
return dx * dx + dy * dy;
}
// Find the distance from this point to a line segment (which is not the same as from this
// point to anywhere on an infinite line). Also returns the closest point.
public double DistanceToLineSegment(MyVector lineSegmentPoint1, MyVector lineSegmentPoint2,
out MyVector closestPoint)
{
return Math.Sqrt(DistanceToLineSegmentSquared(lineSegmentPoint1, lineSegmentPoint2,
out closestPoint));
}
// Same as above, but avoid using Sqrt(), saves a new nanoseconds in cases where you only want
// to compare several distances to find the smallest or largest, but don't need the distance
public double DistanceToLineSegmentSquared(MyVector lineSegmentPoint1,
MyVector lineSegmentPoint2, out MyVector closestPoint)
{
// Compute length of line segment (squared) and handle special case of coincident points
double segmentLengthSquared = lineSegmentPoint1.DistanceSquared(lineSegmentPoint2);
if (segmentLengthSquared < 1E-7f) // Arbitrary "close enough for government work" value
{
closestPoint = lineSegmentPoint1;
return this.DistanceSquared(closestPoint);
}
// Use the magic formula to compute the "projection" of this point on the infinite line
MyVector lineSegment = lineSegmentPoint2 - lineSegmentPoint1;
double t = (this - lineSegmentPoint1).DotProduct(lineSegment) / segmentLengthSquared;
// Handle the two cases where the projection is not on the line segment, and the case where
// the projection is on the segment
if (t <= 0)
closestPoint = lineSegmentPoint1;
else if (t >= 1)
closestPoint = lineSegmentPoint2;
else
closestPoint = lineSegmentPoint1 + (lineSegment * t);
return this.DistanceSquared(closestPoint);
}
public double DotProduct(MyVector otherVector)
{
return this._x * otherVector._x + this._y * otherVector._y;
}
public static MyVector operator +(MyVector leftVector, MyVector rightVector)
{
return new MyVector(leftVector._x + rightVector._x, leftVector._y + rightVector._y);
}
public static MyVector operator -(MyVector leftVector, MyVector rightVector)
{
return new MyVector(leftVector._x - rightVector._x, leftVector._y - rightVector._y);
}
public static MyVector operator *(MyVector aVector, double aScalar)
{
return new MyVector(aVector._x * aScalar, aVector._y * aScalar);
}
// Added using ReSharper due to CodeAnalysis nagging
public bool Equals(MyVector other)
{
return _x.Equals(other._x) && _y.Equals(other._y);
}
public override bool Equals(object obj)
{
if (ReferenceEquals(null, obj)) return false;
return obj is MyVector && Equals((MyVector) obj);
}
public override int GetHashCode()
{
unchecked
{
return (_x.GetHashCode()*397) ^ _y.GetHashCode();
}
}
public static bool operator ==(MyVector left, MyVector right)
{
return left.Equals(right);
}
public static bool operator !=(MyVector left, MyVector right)
{
return !left.Equals(right);
}
}
这是一个小测试程序。
public static class JustTesting
{
public static void Main()
{
Stopwatch stopwatch = new Stopwatch();
stopwatch.Start();
for (int i = 0; i < 10000000; i++)
{
TestIt(1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0.70710678118654757);
TestIt(5, 4, 0, 0, 20, 10, 1.3416407864998738);
TestIt(30, 15, 0, 0, 20, 10, 11.180339887498949);
TestIt(-30, 15, 0, 0, 20, 10, 33.541019662496844);
TestIt(5, 1, 0, 0, 10, 0, 1.0);
TestIt(1, 5, 0, 0, 0, 10, 1.0);
}
stopwatch.Stop();
TimeSpan timeSpan = stopwatch.Elapsed;
}
private static void TestIt(float aPointX, float aPointY,
float lineSegmentPoint1X, float lineSegmentPoint1Y,
float lineSegmentPoint2X, float lineSegmentPoint2Y,
double expectedAnswer)
{
// Katz
double d1 = DistanceFromPointToLineSegment(new MyVector(aPointX, aPointY),
new MyVector(lineSegmentPoint1X, lineSegmentPoint1Y),
new MyVector(lineSegmentPoint2X, lineSegmentPoint2Y));
Debug.Assert(d1 == expectedAnswer);
/*
// Katz using squared distance
double d2 = DistanceFromPointToLineSegmentSquared(new MyVector(aPointX, aPointY),
new MyVector(lineSegmentPoint1X, lineSegmentPoint1Y),
new MyVector(lineSegmentPoint2X, lineSegmentPoint2Y));
Debug.Assert(Math.Abs(d2 - expectedAnswer * expectedAnswer) < 1E-7f);
*/
/*
// Matti (optimized)
double d3 = FloatVector.DistanceToLineSegment(new PointF(aPointX, aPointY),
new PointF(lineSegmentPoint1X, lineSegmentPoint1Y),
new PointF(lineSegmentPoint2X, lineSegmentPoint2Y));
Debug.Assert(Math.Abs(d3 - expectedAnswer) < 1E-7f);
*/
}
private static double DistanceFromPointToLineSegment(MyVector aPoint,
MyVector lineSegmentPoint1, MyVector lineSegmentPoint2)
{
MyVector closestPoint; // Not used
return aPoint.DistanceToLineSegment(lineSegmentPoint1, lineSegmentPoint2,
out closestPoint);
}
private static double DistanceFromPointToLineSegmentSquared(MyVector aPoint,
MyVector lineSegmentPoint1, MyVector lineSegmentPoint2)
{
MyVector closestPoint; // Not used
return aPoint.DistanceToLineSegmentSquared(lineSegmentPoint1, lineSegmentPoint2,
out closestPoint);
}
}
如您所见,我试图衡量使用避免Sqrt()方法的版本与使用普通版本之间的差异。我的测试表明你可能可以节省2.5%,但我甚至不确定——各种测试运行中的变化是相同的数量级。我还试着测量了Matti发布的版本(加上一个明显的优化),该版本似乎比基于Katz/Grumdrig代码的版本慢了大约4%。
编辑:顺便说一句,我还尝试过测量一种方法,该方法使用叉乘(和平方根())来查找到无限直线(不是线段)的距离,它大约快32%。
用t-sql编码
点为(@px, @py),线段从(@ax, @ay)到(@bx, @by)
create function fn_sqr (@NumberToSquare decimal(18,10))
returns decimal(18,10)
as
begin
declare @Result decimal(18,10)
set @Result = @NumberToSquare * @NumberToSquare
return @Result
end
go
create function fn_Distance(@ax decimal (18,10) , @ay decimal (18,10), @bx decimal(18,10), @by decimal(18,10))
returns decimal(18,10)
as
begin
declare @Result decimal(18,10)
set @Result = (select dbo.fn_sqr(@ax - @bx) + dbo.fn_sqr(@ay - @by) )
return @Result
end
go
create function fn_DistanceToSegmentSquared(@px decimal(18,10), @py decimal(18,10), @ax decimal(18,10), @ay decimal(18,10), @bx decimal(18,10), @by decimal(18,10))
returns decimal(18,10)
as
begin
declare @l2 decimal(18,10)
set @l2 = (select dbo.fn_Distance(@ax, @ay, @bx, @by))
if @l2 = 0
return dbo.fn_Distance(@px, @py, @ax, @ay)
declare @t decimal(18,10)
set @t = ((@px - @ax) * (@bx - @ax) + (@py - @ay) * (@by - @ay)) / @l2
if (@t < 0)
return dbo.fn_Distance(@px, @py, @ax, @ay);
if (@t > 1)
return dbo.fn_Distance(@px, @py, @bx, @by);
return dbo.fn_Distance(@px, @py, @ax + @t * (@bx - @ax), @ay + @t * (@by - @ay))
end
go
create function fn_DistanceToSegment(@px decimal(18,10), @py decimal(18,10), @ax decimal(18,10), @ay decimal(18,10), @bx decimal(18,10), @by decimal(18,10))
returns decimal(18,10)
as
begin
return sqrt(dbo.fn_DistanceToSegmentSquared(@px, @py , @ax , @ay , @bx , @by ))
end
go
--example execution for distance from a point at (6,1) to line segment that runs from (4,2) to (2,1)
select dbo.fn_DistanceToSegment(6, 1, 4, 2, 2, 1)
--result = 2.2360679775
--example execution for distance from a point at (-3,-2) to line segment that runs from (0,-2) to (-2,1)
select dbo.fn_DistanceToSegment(-3, -2, 0, -2, -2, 1)
--result = 2.4961508830
--example execution for distance from a point at (0,-2) to line segment that runs from (0,-2) to (-2,1)
select dbo.fn_DistanceToSegment(0,-2, 0, -2, -2, 1)
--result = 0.0000000000