我需要一个基本函数来求点到线段的最短距离。你可以随意用任何你想要的语言来编写解决方案;我可以把它翻译成什么我正在使用(Javascript)。
编辑:线段由两个端点定义。线段AB由两点A (x1,y1)和B (x2,y2)定义。我要求的是这条线段到点C (x3,y3)的距离。我的几何技能生疏了,所以我看到的例子让我很困惑,我很遗憾地承认。
我需要一个基本函数来求点到线段的最短距离。你可以随意用任何你想要的语言来编写解决方案;我可以把它翻译成什么我正在使用(Javascript)。
编辑:线段由两个端点定义。线段AB由两点A (x1,y1)和B (x2,y2)定义。我要求的是这条线段到点C (x3,y3)的距离。我的几何技能生疏了,所以我看到的例子让我很困惑,我很遗憾地承认。
当前回答
在f#中,点c到a和b之间的线段的距离为:
let pointToLineSegmentDistance (a: Vector, b: Vector) (c: Vector) =
let d = b - a
let s = d.Length
let lambda = (c - a) * d / s
let p = (lambda |> max 0.0 |> min s) * d / s
(a + p - c).Length
向量d沿着线段从a指向b。d/s与c-a的点积给出了无限直线与点c之间最接近点的参数。使用min和max函数将该参数钳制到范围0..s,使该点位于a和b之间。最后,a+p-c的长度是c到线段上最近点的距离。
使用示例:
pointToLineSegmentDistance (Vector(0.0, 0.0), Vector(1.0, 0.0)) (Vector(-1.0, 1.0))
其他回答
基于Joshua Javascript的AutoHotkeys版本:
plDist(x, y, x1, y1, x2, y2) {
A:= x - x1
B:= y - y1
C:= x2 - x1
D:= y2 - y1
dot:= A*C + B*D
sqLen:= C*C + D*D
param:= dot / sqLen
if (param < 0 || ((x1 = x2) && (y1 = y2))) {
xx:= x1
yy:= y1
} else if (param > 1) {
xx:= x2
yy:= y2
} else {
xx:= x1 + param*C
yy:= y1 + param*D
}
dx:= x - xx
dy:= y - yy
return sqrt(dx*dx + dy*dy)
}
I'm assuming you want to find the shortest distance between the point and a line segment; to do this, you need to find the line (lineA) which is perpendicular to your line segment (lineB) which goes through your point, determine the intersection between that line (lineA) and your line which goes through your line segment (lineB); if that point is between the two points of your line segment, then the distance is the distance between your point and the point you just found which is the intersection of lineA and lineB; if the point is not between the two points of your line segment, you need to get the distance between your point and the closer of two ends of the line segment; this can be done easily by taking the square distance (to avoid a square root) between the point and the two points of the line segment; whichever is closer, take the square root of that one.
用t-sql编码
点为(@px, @py),线段从(@ax, @ay)到(@bx, @by)
create function fn_sqr (@NumberToSquare decimal(18,10))
returns decimal(18,10)
as
begin
declare @Result decimal(18,10)
set @Result = @NumberToSquare * @NumberToSquare
return @Result
end
go
create function fn_Distance(@ax decimal (18,10) , @ay decimal (18,10), @bx decimal(18,10), @by decimal(18,10))
returns decimal(18,10)
as
begin
declare @Result decimal(18,10)
set @Result = (select dbo.fn_sqr(@ax - @bx) + dbo.fn_sqr(@ay - @by) )
return @Result
end
go
create function fn_DistanceToSegmentSquared(@px decimal(18,10), @py decimal(18,10), @ax decimal(18,10), @ay decimal(18,10), @bx decimal(18,10), @by decimal(18,10))
returns decimal(18,10)
as
begin
declare @l2 decimal(18,10)
set @l2 = (select dbo.fn_Distance(@ax, @ay, @bx, @by))
if @l2 = 0
return dbo.fn_Distance(@px, @py, @ax, @ay)
declare @t decimal(18,10)
set @t = ((@px - @ax) * (@bx - @ax) + (@py - @ay) * (@by - @ay)) / @l2
if (@t < 0)
return dbo.fn_Distance(@px, @py, @ax, @ay);
if (@t > 1)
return dbo.fn_Distance(@px, @py, @bx, @by);
return dbo.fn_Distance(@px, @py, @ax + @t * (@bx - @ax), @ay + @t * (@by - @ay))
end
go
create function fn_DistanceToSegment(@px decimal(18,10), @py decimal(18,10), @ax decimal(18,10), @ay decimal(18,10), @bx decimal(18,10), @by decimal(18,10))
returns decimal(18,10)
as
begin
return sqrt(dbo.fn_DistanceToSegmentSquared(@px, @py , @ax , @ay , @bx , @by ))
end
go
--example execution for distance from a point at (6,1) to line segment that runs from (4,2) to (2,1)
select dbo.fn_DistanceToSegment(6, 1, 4, 2, 2, 1)
--result = 2.2360679775
--example execution for distance from a point at (-3,-2) to line segment that runs from (0,-2) to (-2,1)
select dbo.fn_DistanceToSegment(-3, -2, 0, -2, -2, 1)
--result = 2.4961508830
--example execution for distance from a point at (0,-2) to line segment that runs from (0,-2) to (-2,1)
select dbo.fn_DistanceToSegment(0,-2, 0, -2, -2, 1)
--result = 0.0000000000
Consider this modification to Grumdrig's answer above. Many times you'll find that floating point imprecision can cause problems. I'm using doubles in the version below, but you can easily change to floats. The important part is that it uses an epsilon to handle the "slop". In addition, you'll many times want to know WHERE the intersection happened, or if it happened at all. If the returned t is < 0.0 or > 1.0, no collision occurred. However, even if no collision occurred, many times you'll want to know where the closest point on the segment to P is, and thus I use qx and qy to return this location.
double PointSegmentDistanceSquared( double px, double py,
double p1x, double p1y,
double p2x, double p2y,
double& t,
double& qx, double& qy)
{
static const double kMinSegmentLenSquared = 0.00000001; // adjust to suit. If you use float, you'll probably want something like 0.000001f
static const double kEpsilon = 1.0E-14; // adjust to suit. If you use floats, you'll probably want something like 1E-7f
double dx = p2x - p1x;
double dy = p2y - p1y;
double dp1x = px - p1x;
double dp1y = py - p1y;
const double segLenSquared = (dx * dx) + (dy * dy);
if (segLenSquared >= -kMinSegmentLenSquared && segLenSquared <= kMinSegmentLenSquared)
{
// segment is a point.
qx = p1x;
qy = p1y;
t = 0.0;
return ((dp1x * dp1x) + (dp1y * dp1y));
}
else
{
// Project a line from p to the segment [p1,p2]. By considering the line
// extending the segment, parameterized as p1 + (t * (p2 - p1)),
// we find projection of point p onto the line.
// It falls where t = [(p - p1) . (p2 - p1)] / |p2 - p1|^2
t = ((dp1x * dx) + (dp1y * dy)) / segLenSquared;
if (t < kEpsilon)
{
// intersects at or to the "left" of first segment vertex (p1x, p1y). If t is approximately 0.0, then
// intersection is at p1. If t is less than that, then there is no intersection (i.e. p is not within
// the 'bounds' of the segment)
if (t > -kEpsilon)
{
// intersects at 1st segment vertex
t = 0.0;
}
// set our 'intersection' point to p1.
qx = p1x;
qy = p1y;
// Note: If you wanted the ACTUAL intersection point of where the projected lines would intersect if
// we were doing PointLineDistanceSquared, then qx would be (p1x + (t * dx)) and qy would be (p1y + (t * dy)).
}
else if (t > (1.0 - kEpsilon))
{
// intersects at or to the "right" of second segment vertex (p2x, p2y). If t is approximately 1.0, then
// intersection is at p2. If t is greater than that, then there is no intersection (i.e. p is not within
// the 'bounds' of the segment)
if (t < (1.0 + kEpsilon))
{
// intersects at 2nd segment vertex
t = 1.0;
}
// set our 'intersection' point to p2.
qx = p2x;
qy = p2y;
// Note: If you wanted the ACTUAL intersection point of where the projected lines would intersect if
// we were doing PointLineDistanceSquared, then qx would be (p1x + (t * dx)) and qy would be (p1y + (t * dy)).
}
else
{
// The projection of the point to the point on the segment that is perpendicular succeeded and the point
// is 'within' the bounds of the segment. Set the intersection point as that projected point.
qx = p1x + (t * dx);
qy = p1y + (t * dy);
}
// return the squared distance from p to the intersection point. Note that we return the squared distance
// as an optimization because many times you just need to compare relative distances and the squared values
// works fine for that. If you want the ACTUAL distance, just take the square root of this value.
double dpqx = px - qx;
double dpqy = py - qy;
return ((dpqx * dpqx) + (dpqy * dpqy));
}
}
2D坐标数组的Python Numpy实现:
import numpy as np
def dist2d(p1, p2, coords):
''' Distance from points to a finite line btwn p1 -> p2 '''
assert coords.ndim == 2 and coords.shape[1] == 2, 'coords is not 2 dim'
dp = p2 - p1
st = dp[0]**2 + dp[1]**2
u = ((coords[:, 0] - p1[0]) * dp[0] + (coords[:, 1] - p1[1]) * dp[1]) / st
u[u > 1.] = 1.
u[u < 0.] = 0.
dx = (p1[0] + u * dp[0]) - coords[:, 0]
dy = (p1[1] + u * dp[1]) - coords[:, 1]
return np.sqrt(dx**2 + dy**2)
# Usage:
p1 = np.array([0., 0.])
p2 = np.array([0., 10.])
# List of coordinates
coords = np.array(
[[0., 0.],
[5., 5.],
[10., 10.],
[20., 20.]
])
d = dist2d(p1, p2, coords)
# Single coordinate
coord = np.array([25., 25.])
d = dist2d(p1, p2, coord[np.newaxis, :])