@SharpCoder的答案使用fs.promises的异步版本:

const fs = require('fs');
const afs = fs.promises;

const deleteFolderRecursive = async path =>  {
    if (fs.existsSync(path)) {
        for (let entry of await afs.readdir(path)) {
            const curPath = path + "/" + entry;
            if ((await afs.lstat(curPath)).isDirectory())
                await deleteFolderRecursive(curPath);
            else await afs.unlink(curPath);
        }
        await afs.rmdir(path);
    }
};

大多数在Node.js中使用fs的人都希望函数能够接近“Unix方式”来处理文件。我使用fs-extra来带来所有很酷的东西:

fs-extra包含了普通Node.js中不包含的方法 fs包。如mkdir -p、cp -r、rm -rf等。

更好的是，fs-extra是本地fs的替代品。fs中的所有方法都是未修改的，并附加到它。 这意味着你可以用fs-extra替换fs:

// this can be replaced
const fs = require('fs')

// by this
const fs = require('fs-extra')

然后你可以这样删除一个文件夹:

fs.removeSync('/tmp/myFolder'); 
//or
fs.remove('/tmp/myFolder', callback);

在Node.js的最新版本(12.10.0或更高版本)中，rmdir样式函数fs.rmdir()、fs.rmdirSync()和fs.promises.rmdir()有一个新的实验性选项递归，允许删除非空目录，例如:

fs.rmdir(path, { recursive: true });

GitHub上的相关PR: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/29168

我通常不复活旧线程，但这里有很多关于搅动和没有rimraf的答案，这些对我来说似乎都太复杂了。

首先，在现代Node (>= v8.0.0)中，你可以只使用节点核心模块来简化过程，完全异步，并在5行函数中并行化文件的解链接，并且仍然保持可读性:

const fs = require('fs');
const path = require('path');
const { promisify } = require('util');
const readdir = promisify(fs.readdir);
const rmdir = promisify(fs.rmdir);
const unlink = promisify(fs.unlink);

exports.rmdirs = async function rmdirs(dir) {
  let entries = await readdir(dir, { withFileTypes: true });
  await Promise.all(entries.map(entry => {
    let fullPath = path.join(dir, entry.name);
    return entry.isDirectory() ? rmdirs(fullPath) : unlink(fullPath);
  }));
  await rmdir(dir);
};

另一方面，路径遍历攻击的保护不适合此函数，因为

It is out of scope based on the Single Responsibility Principle. Should be handled by the caller not this function. This is akin to the command-line rm -rf in that it takes an argument and will allow the user to rm -rf / if asked to. It would be the responsibility of a script to guard not the rm program itself. This function would be unable to determine such an attack since it does not have a frame of reference. Again that is the responsibility of the caller who would have the context of intent which would provide it a reference to compare the path traversal. Sym-links are not a concern as .isDirectory() is false for sym-links and are unlinked not recursed into.

最后但并非最不重要的是，有一种罕见的竞争条件，即在运行递归时，如果在正确的时间在脚本之外取消链接或删除其中一个条目，则递归可能会出错。由于这种情况在大多数环境中并不典型，因此可能会被忽略。然而，如果需要(对于一些边缘情况)，这个问题可以通过下面这个稍微复杂一点的例子来缓解:

exports.rmdirs = async function rmdirs(dir) {
  let entries = await readdir(dir, { withFileTypes: true });
  let results = await Promise.all(entries.map(entry => {
    let fullPath = path.join(dir, entry.name);
    let task = entry.isDirectory() ? rmdirs(fullPath) : unlink(fullPath);
    return task.catch(error => ({ error }));
  }));
  results.forEach(result => {
    // Ignore missing files/directories; bail on other errors
    if (result && result.error.code !== 'ENOENT') throw result.error;
  });
  await rmdir(dir);
};

编辑:使isDirectory()成为一个函数。最后删除实际目录。修复丢失的递归。

const fs = require("fs")
const path = require("path")

let _dirloc = '<path_do_the_directory>'

if (fs.existsSync(_dirloc)) {
  fs.readdir(path, (err, files) => {
    if (!err) {
      for (let file of files) {
        // Delete each file
        fs.unlinkSync(path.join(_dirloc, file))
      }
    }
  })
  // After the 'done' of each file delete,
  // Delete the directory itself.
  if (fs.unlinkSync(_dirloc)) {
    console.log('Directory has been deleted!')
  }
}

只需使用rmdir模块!这很简单。