const fs = require("fs");
fs.rmdir("./test", { recursive: true }, (err) => {
  if (err) {
    console.error(err);
  }
});

提供递归:true选项。并且它将递归地删除给定路径下的所有文件和目录。(假设test是根目录)

return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
  const fs = require("fs");
  // directory path
  const dir = "your/dir";

  // delete directory recursively <------
  fs.rmdir(dir, { recursive: true }, (err) => {
    if (err) {
      reject(err);
    }
    resolve(`${dir} is deleted!`);
  });
});

//不使用任何第三方lib

const fs = require('fs');
var FOLDER_PATH = "./dirname";
var files = fs.readdirSync(FOLDER_PATH);
files.forEach(element => {
    fs.unlinkSync(FOLDER_PATH + "/" + element);
});
fs.rmdirSync(FOLDER_PATH);

从Node文档中可以看到。

要获得类似rm -rf Unix命令的行为，请使用带有选项{recursive: true, force: true}的fs.rm()。

例如(ESM)

import { rm } from 'node:fs/promises';

await rm('/path/to', { recursive: true, force: true });

我通常不复活旧线程，但这里有很多关于搅动和没有rimraf的答案，这些对我来说似乎都太复杂了。

首先，在现代Node (>= v8.0.0)中，你可以只使用节点核心模块来简化过程，完全异步，并在5行函数中并行化文件的解链接，并且仍然保持可读性:

const fs = require('fs');
const path = require('path');
const { promisify } = require('util');
const readdir = promisify(fs.readdir);
const rmdir = promisify(fs.rmdir);
const unlink = promisify(fs.unlink);

exports.rmdirs = async function rmdirs(dir) {
  let entries = await readdir(dir, { withFileTypes: true });
  await Promise.all(entries.map(entry => {
    let fullPath = path.join(dir, entry.name);
    return entry.isDirectory() ? rmdirs(fullPath) : unlink(fullPath);
  }));
  await rmdir(dir);
};

另一方面，路径遍历攻击的保护不适合此函数，因为

It is out of scope based on the Single Responsibility Principle. Should be handled by the caller not this function. This is akin to the command-line rm -rf in that it takes an argument and will allow the user to rm -rf / if asked to. It would be the responsibility of a script to guard not the rm program itself. This function would be unable to determine such an attack since it does not have a frame of reference. Again that is the responsibility of the caller who would have the context of intent which would provide it a reference to compare the path traversal. Sym-links are not a concern as .isDirectory() is false for sym-links and are unlinked not recursed into.

最后但并非最不重要的是，有一种罕见的竞争条件，即在运行递归时，如果在正确的时间在脚本之外取消链接或删除其中一个条目，则递归可能会出错。由于这种情况在大多数环境中并不典型，因此可能会被忽略。然而，如果需要(对于一些边缘情况)，这个问题可以通过下面这个稍微复杂一点的例子来缓解:

exports.rmdirs = async function rmdirs(dir) {
  let entries = await readdir(dir, { withFileTypes: true });
  let results = await Promise.all(entries.map(entry => {
    let fullPath = path.join(dir, entry.name);
    let task = entry.isDirectory() ? rmdirs(fullPath) : unlink(fullPath);
    return task.catch(error => ({ error }));
  }));
  results.forEach(result => {
    // Ignore missing files/directories; bail on other errors
    if (result && result.error.code !== 'ENOENT') throw result.error;
  });
  await rmdir(dir);
};

编辑:使isDirectory()成为一个函数。最后删除实际目录。修复丢失的递归。

而递归是fs.rmdir的一个实验性选项

function rm (path, cb) {
    fs.stat(path, function (err, stats) {
        if (err)
            return cb(err);

        if (stats.isFile())
            return fs.unlink(path, cb);

        fs.rmdir(path, function (err) {
            if (!err || err && err.code != 'ENOTEMPTY') 
                return cb(err);

            fs.readdir(path, function (err, files) {
                if (err)
                    return cb(err);

                let next = i => i == files.length ? 
                    rm(path, cb) : 
                    rm(path + '/' + files[i], err => err ? cb(err) : next(i + 1));

                next(0);
            });
        });
    });
}