符号链接为文件提供了另一个名称，在某种程度上类似于硬链接。但是，即使文件中仍然存在符号链接，也可以删除文件。

当原始文件被移动时，硬链接非常有用。例如，将文件从/bin移动到/usr/bin或/usr/local/bin。到/bin中文件的任何符号链接都将被破坏，但是硬链接(直接到文件的inode的链接)不会关心。

硬链接可能占用更少的磁盘空间，因为它们只占用一个目录条目，而符号链接需要自己的inode来存储它所指向的名称。

Hard links also take less time to resolve - symlinks can point to other symlinks that are in symlinked directories. And some of these could be on NFS or other high-latency file systems, and so could result in network traffic to resolve. Hard links, being always on the same file system, are always resolved in a single look-up, and never involve network latency (if it's a hardlink on an NFS filesystem, the NFS server would do the resolution, and it would be invisible to the client system). Sometimes this is important. Not for me, but I can imagine high-performance systems where this might be important.

I also think things like mmap(2) and even open(2) use the same functionality as hardlinks to keep a file's inode active so that even if the file gets unlink(2)ed, the inode remains to allow the process continued access, and only once the process closes it does the file really go away. This allows for much safer temporary files (if you can get the open and unlink to happen atomically, which there may be a POSIX API for that I'm not remembering, then you really have a safe temporary file) where you can read/write your data without anyone being able to access it. Well, that was true before /proc gave everyone the ability to look at your file descriptors, but that's another story.

说到这里，恢复一个在进程a中打开，但在文件系统中未链接的文件需要使用硬链接来重新创建inode链接，这样当打开该文件的进程关闭或离开时，该文件不会消失。

另外:

硬链接的读取性能优于符号链接(微性能) 符号链接可以被复制，版本控制，等等。换句话说，它们是一个实际的文件。另一方面，硬链接的级别略低，您会发现，与符号链接相比，提供将硬链接作为硬链接而不是普通文件处理的工具较少

我刚刚发现了一个简单的方法来理解硬链接在一个常见的场景，软件安装。

有一天，我下载了一个软件到下载文件夹进行安装。在我做sudo make install后，一些可执行文件被cped到本地bin文件夹。这里，cp创建硬链接。我对这个软件很满意，但很快就意识到，从长远来看，下载并不是一个好地方。所以我把软件文件夹移动到源目录。好吧，我仍然可以像以前一样运行软件而不用担心任何目标链接的事情，就像在Windows中一样。这意味着硬链接可以直接找到inode和其他文件。

俗话说，一幅画胜过千言万语。以下是我对它的想象:

下面是我们如何得到这张照片的:

Create a name myfile.txt in the file system that points to a new inode (which contains the metadata for the file and points to the blocks of data that contain its contents, i.e. the text "Hello, World!": $ echo 'Hello, World!' > myfile.txt Create a hard link my-hard-link to the file myfile.txt, which means "create a file that should point to the same inode that myfile.txt points to": $ ln myfile.txt my-hard-link Create a soft link my-soft-link to the file myfile.txt, which means "create a file that should point to the file myfile.txt": $ ln -s myfile.txt my-soft-link

看看如果myfile.txt被删除(或移动)会发生什么:my-hard-link仍然指向相同的内容，因此不受影响，而my-soft-link现在什么都不指向。其他答案讨论了每种方法的利与弊。

我刚刚发现了一个简单的方法来理解硬链接在一个常见的场景，软件安装。

有一天，我下载了一个软件到下载文件夹进行安装。在我做sudo make install后，一些可执行文件被cped到本地bin文件夹。这里，cp创建硬链接。我对这个软件很满意，但很快就意识到，从长远来看，下载并不是一个好地方。所以我把软件文件夹移动到源目录。好吧，我仍然可以像以前一样运行软件而不用担心任何目标链接的事情，就像在Windows中一样。这意味着硬链接可以直接找到inode和其他文件。