有没有比下面的pausecomp函数（取自此处）更好的方法来设计JavaScript中的睡眠？
function pausecomp(millis)
{
var date = new Date();
var curDate = null;
do { curDate = new Date(); }
while(curDate-date < millis);
}
这不是JavaScript中的Sleep的重复-动作之间的延迟；我希望在函数的中间有一个真正的睡眠，而不是在代码执行之前有一段延迟。
当前回答
在LiveScript（编译为JavaScript）中，可以执行以下操作：
sleep = (ms, func) -> set-timeout func, ms
console.log "hello-1"
<- sleep 2000ms
console.log "hello-2"
<- sleep 2000ms
console.log "hello-3"
其他回答
从该链接获取的代码不会冻结计算机。但它只在Firefox中有效。
/**
* Netscape compatible WaitForDelay function.
* You can use it as an alternative to Thread.Sleep() in any major programming language
* that support it while JavaScript it self doesn't have any built-in function to do such a thing.
* parameters:
* (Number) delay in millisecond
*/
function nsWaitForDelay(delay) {
/**
* Just uncomment this code if you're building an extension for Firefox.
* Since Firefox 3, we'll have to ask for user permission to execute XPCOM objects.
*/
netscape.security.PrivilegeManager.enablePrivilege("UniversalXPConnect");
// Get the current thread.
var thread = Components.classes["@mozilla.org/thread-manager;1"].getService(Components.interfaces.nsIThreadManager).currentThread;
// Create an inner property to be used later as a notifier.
this.delayed = true;
/* Call JavaScript setTimeout function
* to execute this.delayed = false
* after it finishes.
*/
setTimeout("this.delayed = false;", delay);
/**
* Keep looping until this.delayed = false
*/
while (this.delayed) {
/**
* This code will not freeze your browser as it's documented in here:
* https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Code_snippets/Threads#Waiting_for_a_background_task_to_complete
*/
thread.processNextEvent(true);
}
}
让事情看起来像大多数人想要的更好的解决方案是使用匿名函数：
alert('start');
var a = 'foo';
// Lots of code
setTimeout(function(){ // Beginning of code that should run AFTER the timeout
alert(a);
// Lots more code
}, 5000); // Put the timeout here
这可能是最接近你想要的东西。
注意，如果你需要多次睡眠，这可能会在匆忙中变得很难看，你可能需要重新考虑你的设计。
为了测试，我需要一段忙碌的等待。我不想拆分代码，因为这需要很多工作，所以一个简单的for为我做了这件事。
for (var i=0; i<1000000; i++){
// Waiting
}
我看不出这样做有什么坏处，这对我来说很有好处。
现在还可以使用本机模块util来提供常规同步函数。
const { promisify } = require('util')
const sleep = promisify(setTimeout)
module.exports = () => {
await someAsyncFunction()
await sleep(2000)
console.log('2 seconds later...')
}
可以使用带有递增较大值的闭包调用setTimeout（）。
var items = ['item1', 'item2', 'item3'];
function functionToExecute(item) {
console.log('function executed for item: ' + item);
}
$.each(items, function (index, item) {
var timeoutValue = index * 2000;
setTimeout(function() {
console.log('waited ' + timeoutValue + ' milliseconds');
functionToExecute(item);
}, timeoutValue);
});
结果：
waited 0 milliseconds
function executed for item: item1
waited 2000 milliseconds
function executed for item: item2
waited 4000 milliseconds
function executed for item: item3
