MSTest is essentially NUnit slightly reworked, with a few new features (such as assembly setup and teardown, not just fixture and test level), and missing some of the best bits (such as the new 2.4 constraint syntax). NUnit is more mature, and there is more support for it from other vendors; and of course since it's always been free (whereas MSTest only made it into the Professional version of Visual Studio 2008, and before that it was in way more expensive SKUs), and most ALT.NET projects use it.

话虽如此，还是有一些公司非常不愿意使用没有微软标签的东西，尤其是OSS代码。因此，拥有官方的微软测试框架可能是这些公司需要进行测试的动机;老实说，重要的是测试，而不是你使用什么工具(使用Tuomas Hietanen的代码，你几乎可以让你的测试框架可互换)。

我更喜欢使用MS的小测试框架，但现在我坚持使用NUnit。多发性硬化的问题通常是(对我来说)

必须维护的共享“测试”文件(无意义) 测试列表会与多个开发人员/ vcs产生冲突 糟糕的集成UI -令人困惑的设置，繁重的测试选择 没有好的外部流道

警告

如果我正在测试一个aspx站点，我肯定会使用MS的 如果我是独自开发，MS也可以 如果我的技能有限，不能配置NUnit:)

我发现编写我的测试并启动NUnitGUI或其他前端(testDriven的价格非常非常非常昂贵)要容易得多。使用命令行版本设置调试也非常简单。

我收到消息说“NUnit文件结构比VSTest更丰富”… 当然，如果你更喜欢NUnit的文件结构，你可以使用这个解决方案的另一种方式，像这样(NUnit→Visual Studio):

 #if !MSTEST
     using NUnit.Framework;
 #else
     using Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.UnitTesting;
     using TestFixture = Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.UnitTesting.TestClassAttribute;
     using Test = Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.UnitTesting.TestMethodAttribute;
     using SetUp = Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.UnitTesting.TestInitializeAttribute;
     using TearDown = Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.UnitTesting.TestCleanupAttribute;
 #endif

或任何其他转换…:-)这里的用法只是编译器的别名。

与NUnit相比，我对Visual Studio单元测试的主要不满是Visual Studio测试创建倾向于为私有成员访问注入一堆生成的代码。

有些人可能想测试他们的私有方法，有些人可能不想。那是另一个话题了。

我担心的是，当我编写单元测试时，它们应该被严格控制，这样我才能确切地知道我在测试什么以及我如何测试它。如果有自动生成的代码，我就失去了一些所有权。

Visual Studio 2008内置单元测试框架的优点/变化:

The 2008 version now is available in professional editions (before it required expensive versions of Visual Studio, and this is just for developer unit testing) that left a lot of developers with the only choice of open/external testing frameworks. Built-in API supported by a single company. Use the same tools to to run and create tests (you may run them using the command line also MSTest). Simple design (granted without a mock framework, but this is a great starting point for many programmers). Long term support granted (I still remember what happened to NDoc, and I don't want to commit to a testing framework that might not be supported in five years, but I still consider NUnit a great framework). If using Team Foundation Server as your backend, you can create work items or bugs with the failed test data in a simple fashion.

MSTest is essentially NUnit slightly reworked, with a few new features (such as assembly setup and teardown, not just fixture and test level), and missing some of the best bits (such as the new 2.4 constraint syntax). NUnit is more mature, and there is more support for it from other vendors; and of course since it's always been free (whereas MSTest only made it into the Professional version of Visual Studio 2008, and before that it was in way more expensive SKUs), and most ALT.NET projects use it.

话虽如此，还是有一些公司非常不愿意使用没有微软标签的东西，尤其是OSS代码。因此，拥有官方的微软测试框架可能是这些公司需要进行测试的动机;老实说，重要的是测试，而不是你使用什么工具(使用Tuomas Hietanen的代码，你几乎可以让你的测试框架可互换)。