出于某种原因,在下面的代码段中,构造函数委托似乎不起作用:

function NotImplementedError() { 
  Error.apply(this, arguments); 
}
NotImplementedError.prototype = new Error();

var nie = new NotImplementedError("some message");
console.log("The message is: '"+nie.message+"'")

运行该命令得到的消息是:"。有什么想法,为什么,或者是否有更好的方法来创建一个新的错误子类?是否有一个问题,应用到本机错误构造函数,我不知道?


当前回答

这在Cesium DeveloperError中很好地实现了:

文档 源

它的简化形式是:

var NotImplementedError = function(message) {
    this.name = 'NotImplementedError';
    this.message = message;
    this.stack = (new Error()).stack;
}

// Later on...

throw new NotImplementedError();

其他回答

更新代码,将原型分配给Error。Prototype和instanceof以及你的断言工作。

function NotImplementedError(message = "") {
    this.name = "NotImplementedError";
    this.message = message;
}
NotImplementedError.prototype = Error.prototype;

不过,我会抛出你自己的对象并检查name属性。

throw {name : "NotImplementedError", message : "too lazy to implement"}; 

根据评论进行编辑

在看了评论并试图记住为什么我将prototype分配给Error后。而不是像Nicholas Zakas在他的文章中所做的new Error(),我用下面的代码创建了一个jsFiddle:

function NotImplementedError(message = "") { this.name = "NotImplementedError"; this.message = message; } NotImplementedError.prototype = Error.prototype; function NotImplementedError2(message = "") { this.message = message; } NotImplementedError2.prototype = new Error(); try { var e = new NotImplementedError("NotImplementedError message"); throw e; } catch (ex1) { console.log(ex1.stack); console.log("ex1 instanceof NotImplementedError = " + (ex1 instanceof NotImplementedError)); console.log("ex1 instanceof Error = " + (ex1 instanceof Error)); console.log("ex1.name = " + ex1.name); console.log("ex1.message = " + ex1.message); } try { var e = new NotImplementedError2("NotImplementedError2 message"); throw e; } catch (ex1) { console.log(ex1.stack); console.log("ex1 instanceof NotImplementedError2 = " + (ex1 instanceof NotImplementedError2)); console.log("ex1 instanceof Error = " + (ex1 instanceof Error)); console.log("ex1.name = " + ex1.name); console.log("ex1.message = " + ex1.message); }

控制台输出如下。

undefined
ex1 instanceof NotImplementedError = true
ex1 instanceof Error = true
ex1.name = NotImplementedError
ex1.message = NotImplementedError message
Error
    at window.onload (http://fiddle.jshell.net/MwMEJ/show/:29:34)
ex1 instanceof NotImplementedError2 = true
ex1 instanceof Error = true
ex1.name = Error
ex1.message = NotImplementedError2 message

这证实了我遇到的“问题”是错误的堆栈属性是创建new error()的行号,而不是抛出e发生的地方。然而,这可能比NotImplementedError.prototype.name = "NotImplementedError"行影响Error对象的副作用要好。

另外,注意NotImplementedError2,当我没有显式地设置.name时,它等于“Error”。然而,正如评论中提到的,因为该版本将prototype设置为new Error(),所以我可以设置NotImplementedError2.prototype.name = "NotImplementedError2"并OK。

构造函数需要类似于工厂方法,并返回您想要的内容。如果你需要额外的方法/属性,你可以在返回之前将它们添加到对象中。

function NotImplementedError(message) { return new Error("Not implemented", message); }

x = new NotImplementedError();

不过我不明白你为什么要这么做。为什么不直接使用new Error…? 自定义异常在JavaScript(或任何非类型化语言)中并没有真正添加太多内容。

上面的很多方法都不起作用。

最后一个是一个实际的错误。如果您使用字符串,它看起来很好,但它不会提供堆栈跟踪。如果你抛出错误,你不能有“Uncaught BadError: bad”,所以你必须删除自定义错误(遗憾的是)。如果你抛出一个对象,它看起来有点偏离,最后一个只是一个平均错误。

此方法创建一个具有自定义名称的错误,同时保留堆栈跟踪:

var errProto = Object.create(Error.prototype, { constructor: { value: Error, enumerable: false, writable: true, configurable: true } }) var isFirefox = !!window.InstallTrigger // Hide stack for Firefox only, as stacks can cause problems with high "frame" counts. function createError(name, message, hideStack) { if (message == null) { message = "" } var customError = Error(message) customError.name = name Object.setPrototypeOf(customError, errProto) if (isFirefox && hideStack) { customError.stack = "" } else if (isFirefox) { var stack = customError.stack var newline = stack.indexOf("\n") + 1 stack = stack.slice(newline) customError.stack = stack var split = stack.split(":") if (split.length > 4) { var a = split[3] var b = split[4] var t = b.slice(0, b.indexOf("\n")) customError.lineNumber = Number(a) customError.columnNumber = Number(t) } } else { var stack = customError.stack var split = stack.split("\n") var secondPart = split.slice(2).join("\n") stack = split[0] + "\n" + secondPart customError.stack = stack var split = secondPart.split(":") var a = split[2] var b = split[3] } throw customError } var frame = 0 function aFunction() { if (++frame === 100) { createError("LazyError", "function getting lazy", false, true) } else { requestAnimationFrame(aFunction) } } setTimeout(aFunction, Math.random() * 500) * { font-family: Verdana; } Check your inspector!

class NotImplementedError extends Error {
  constructor(message) {
    super(message);
    this.message = message;
  }
}
NotImplementedError.prototype.name = 'NotImplementedError';
module.exports = NotImplementedError;

and

try {
  var e = new NotImplementedError("NotImplementedError message");
  throw e;
} catch (ex1) {
  console.log(ex1.stack);
  console.log("ex1 instanceof NotImplementedError = " + (ex1 instanceof NotImplementedError));
  console.log("ex1 instanceof Error = " + (ex1 instanceof Error));
  console.log("ex1.name = " + ex1.name);
  console.log("ex1.message = " + ex1.message);
}

它只是这个答案的一个类表示。

输出

NotImplementedError: NotImplementedError message
  ...stacktrace
ex1 instanceof NotImplementedError = true
ex1 instanceof Error = true
ex1.name = NotImplementedError
ex1.message = NotImplementedError message

我也遇到过类似的问题。我的错误需要是error和NotImplemented的实例,它还需要在控制台中产生一致的回溯。

我的解决方案:

var NotImplemented = (function() {
  var NotImplemented, err;
  NotImplemented = (function() {
    function NotImplemented(message) {
      var err;
      err = new Error(message);
      err.name = "NotImplemented";
      this.message = err.message;
      if (err.stack) this.stack = err.stack;
    }
    return NotImplemented;
  })();
  err = new Error();
  err.name = "NotImplemented";
  NotImplemented.prototype = err;

  return NotImplemented;
}).call(this);

// TEST:
console.log("instanceof Error: " + (new NotImplemented() instanceof Error));
console.log("instanceof NotImplemented: " + (new NotImplemented() instanceofNotImplemented));
console.log("message: "+(new NotImplemented('I was too busy').message));
throw new NotImplemented("just didn't feel like it");

使用node.js运行的结果:

instanceof Error: true
instanceof NotImplemented: true
message: I was too busy

/private/tmp/t.js:24
throw new NotImplemented("just didn't feel like it");
      ^
NotImplemented: just didn't feel like it
    at Error.NotImplemented (/Users/colin/projects/gems/jax/t.js:6:13)
    at Object.<anonymous> (/Users/colin/projects/gems/jax/t.js:24:7)
    at Module._compile (module.js:449:26)
    at Object.Module._extensions..js (module.js:467:10)
    at Module.load (module.js:356:32)
    at Function.Module._load (module.js:312:12)
    at Module.runMain (module.js:487:10)
    at process.startup.processNextTick.process._tickCallback (node.js:244:9)

该错误通过了我的所有3个标准,尽管stack属性是非标准的,但在大多数较新的浏览器中都支持它,这在我的情况下是可以接受的。