出于某种原因,在下面的代码段中,构造函数委托似乎不起作用:

function NotImplementedError() { 
  Error.apply(this, arguments); 
}
NotImplementedError.prototype = new Error();

var nie = new NotImplementedError("some message");
console.log("The message is: '"+nie.message+"'")

运行该命令得到的消息是:"。有什么想法,为什么,或者是否有更好的方法来创建一个新的错误子类?是否有一个问题,应用到本机错误构造函数,我不知道?


当前回答

这是我的实现:

class HttpError extends Error {
  constructor(message, code = null, status = null, stack = null, name = null) {
    super();
    this.message = message;
    this.status = 500;

    this.name = name || this.constructor.name;
    this.code = code || `E_${this.name.toUpperCase()}`;
    this.stack = stack || null;
  }

  static fromObject(error) {
    if (error instanceof HttpError) {
      return error;
    }
    else {
      const { message, code, status, stack } = error;
      return new ServerError(message, code, status, stack, error.constructor.name);
    }
  }

  expose() {
    if (this instanceof ClientError) {
      return { ...this };
    }
    else {
      return {
        name: this.name,
        code: this.code,
        status: this.status,
      }
    }
  }
}

class ServerError extends HttpError {}

class ClientError extends HttpError { }

class IncorrectCredentials extends ClientError {
  constructor(...args) {
    super(...args);
    this.status = 400;
  }
}

class ResourceNotFound extends ClientError {
  constructor(...args) {
    super(...args);
    this.status = 404;
  }
}

示例用法#1:

app.use((req, res, next) => {
  try {
    invalidFunction();
  }
  catch (err) {
    const error = HttpError.fromObject(err);
    return res.status(error.status).send(error.expose());
  }
});

示例用法#2:

router.post('/api/auth', async (req, res) => {
  try {
    const isLogged = await User.logIn(req.body.username, req.body.password);

    if (!isLogged) {
      throw new IncorrectCredentials('Incorrect username or password');
    }
    else {
      return res.status(200).send({
        token,
      });
    }
  }
  catch (err) {
    const error = HttpError.fromObject(err);
    return res.status(error.status).send(error.expose());
  }
});

其他回答

function InvalidValueError(value, type) {
    this.message = "Expected `" + type.name + "`: " + value;
    var error = new Error(this.message);
    this.stack = error.stack;
}
InvalidValueError.prototype = new Error();
InvalidValueError.prototype.name = InvalidValueError.name;
InvalidValueError.prototype.constructor = InvalidValueError;

构造函数需要类似于工厂方法,并返回您想要的内容。如果你需要额外的方法/属性,你可以在返回之前将它们添加到对象中。

function NotImplementedError(message) { return new Error("Not implemented", message); }

x = new NotImplementedError();

不过我不明白你为什么要这么做。为什么不直接使用new Error…? 自定义异常在JavaScript(或任何非类型化语言)中并没有真正添加太多内容。

MDN有一个很好的例子:

try {
  throw new Error('Whoops!');
} catch (e) {
  console.log(e.name + ': ' + e.message);
}

以下是我支持es2015之前版本浏览器的解决方案。它不做任何花哨的原型调整,也不会破坏调试器。

/**  Custom Errors
    // Depends on underscore js
    // This will declare an CustError() class in both 'this' and '_exports' namespaces
    // ctor is optional
    declare_cust_error(function CustError(){}, {ns: [this, _exports], ctor: 
        function cust_err_ctor(instance, clazz, name, msg, info){
            q$.called(arguments)
        }
    })

    // Usage:
    // Second param (pojso) is optional
    try {
        throw CustError.create("foo", {k1: 'v1', k2: 'v2'})
    }catch(ex){
        if(CustError.is_inst(ex)){
            console.error("its a CustError", ex)
        } else {
            throw ex
        }
    }

**/
function declare_cust_error(error_class, opts){
    var p, c, cp
    if(!error_class||!(p=error_class.prototype))throw new Error("error_class must be a Class")
    try{
        c = p.constructor; cp = c.toString()
    }catch(ex){}
    if(!cp || cp.indexOf('function ') != 0 || cp.indexOf('[native code]') > 0)
        throw new Error("error_class must be a classic proto class (pre-es6) but got: " + error_class.toString())

    opts=opts||{}
    
    error_class.__is_cust_error__ = true
    error_class.__cust_error_name__ = c.name

    error_class.create = function cust_error_create(msg, info){
        var instance = new Error(msg)
        instance.info = info
        instance.__is_cust_error__ = true
        instance.__cust_error_name__ = c.name
        if(_.isFunction(opts.ctor)){
            opts.ctor(instance, error_class, c.name, msg, info)
        }
        return instance
    }

    error_class.is_inst = function cust_error_is_inst(instanace){
        return ( (instanace instanceof Error) && instanace.__cust_error_name__ === error_class.__cust_error_name__ )
    }
    
    // Declare error in namespace(s)
    _.each(_.isArray(opts.ns)?opts.ns:[opts.ns], function(ns){ ns[c.name] = error_class })

    return error_class

}

更新代码,将原型分配给Error。Prototype和instanceof以及你的断言工作。

function NotImplementedError(message = "") {
    this.name = "NotImplementedError";
    this.message = message;
}
NotImplementedError.prototype = Error.prototype;

不过,我会抛出你自己的对象并检查name属性。

throw {name : "NotImplementedError", message : "too lazy to implement"}; 

根据评论进行编辑

在看了评论并试图记住为什么我将prototype分配给Error后。而不是像Nicholas Zakas在他的文章中所做的new Error(),我用下面的代码创建了一个jsFiddle:

function NotImplementedError(message = "") { this.name = "NotImplementedError"; this.message = message; } NotImplementedError.prototype = Error.prototype; function NotImplementedError2(message = "") { this.message = message; } NotImplementedError2.prototype = new Error(); try { var e = new NotImplementedError("NotImplementedError message"); throw e; } catch (ex1) { console.log(ex1.stack); console.log("ex1 instanceof NotImplementedError = " + (ex1 instanceof NotImplementedError)); console.log("ex1 instanceof Error = " + (ex1 instanceof Error)); console.log("ex1.name = " + ex1.name); console.log("ex1.message = " + ex1.message); } try { var e = new NotImplementedError2("NotImplementedError2 message"); throw e; } catch (ex1) { console.log(ex1.stack); console.log("ex1 instanceof NotImplementedError2 = " + (ex1 instanceof NotImplementedError2)); console.log("ex1 instanceof Error = " + (ex1 instanceof Error)); console.log("ex1.name = " + ex1.name); console.log("ex1.message = " + ex1.message); }

控制台输出如下。

undefined
ex1 instanceof NotImplementedError = true
ex1 instanceof Error = true
ex1.name = NotImplementedError
ex1.message = NotImplementedError message
Error
    at window.onload (http://fiddle.jshell.net/MwMEJ/show/:29:34)
ex1 instanceof NotImplementedError2 = true
ex1 instanceof Error = true
ex1.name = Error
ex1.message = NotImplementedError2 message

这证实了我遇到的“问题”是错误的堆栈属性是创建new error()的行号,而不是抛出e发生的地方。然而,这可能比NotImplementedError.prototype.name = "NotImplementedError"行影响Error对象的副作用要好。

另外,注意NotImplementedError2,当我没有显式地设置.name时,它等于“Error”。然而,正如评论中提到的,因为该版本将prototype设置为new Error(),所以我可以设置NotImplementedError2.prototype.name = "NotImplementedError2"并OK。