我在我的代码中有这个try块:

try:
    do_something_that_might_raise_an_exception()
except ValueError as err:
    errmsg = 'My custom error message.'
    raise ValueError(errmsg)

严格地说,我实际上引发了另一个ValueError,而不是do_something…()抛出的ValueError,在这种情况下被称为err。如何将自定义消息附加到错误?我尝试以下代码,但失败,由于错误,ValueError实例,不可调用:

try:
    do_something_that_might_raise_an_exception()
except ValueError as err:
    errmsg = 'My custom error message.'
    raise err(errmsg)

try:
    try:
        int('a')
    except ValueError as e:
        raise ValueError('There is a problem: {0}'.format(e))
except ValueError as err:
    print err

打印:

There is a problem: invalid literal for int() with base 10: 'a'

如果你想自定义错误类型,你可以做的一件简单的事情就是基于ValueError定义一个错误类。


更新:对于Python 3,检查Ben的答案


将一条消息附加到当前异常并重新引发: (外面的try/except只是为了展示效果)

对于python 2。其中X >=6:

try:
    try:
      raise ValueError  # something bad...
    except ValueError as err:
      err.message=err.message+" hello"
      raise              # re-raise current exception
except ValueError as e:
    print(" got error of type "+ str(type(e))+" with message " +e.message)

如果err是从ValueError派生的,这也会做正确的事情。例如UnicodeDecodeError。

请注意,您可以添加任何您喜欢的错误。例如err.problematic_array=[1,2,3]。


编辑:@Ducan在注释中指出,上述内容不适用于python 3,因为.message不是ValueError的成员。相反,你可以使用这个(有效的python 2.6或更高版本或3.x):

try:
    try:
      raise ValueError
    except ValueError as err:
       if not err.args: 
           err.args=('',)
       err.args = err.args + ("hello",)
       raise 
except ValueError as e:
    print(" error was "+ str(type(e))+str(e.args))

Edit2:

根据目的,您还可以选择在自己的变量名下添加额外的信息。对于python2和python3:

try:
    try:
      raise ValueError
    except ValueError as err:
       err.extra_info = "hello"
       raise 
except ValueError as e:
    print(" error was "+ str(type(e))+str(e))
    if 'extra_info' in dir(e):
       print e.extra_info

这个代码模板应该允许您用自定义消息引发异常。

try:
     raise ValueError
except ValueError as err:
    raise type(err)("my message")

It seems all the answers are adding info to e.args[0], thereby altering the existing error message. Is there a downside to extending the args tuple instead? I think the possible upside is, you can leave the original error message alone for cases where parsing that string is needed; and you could add multiple elements to the tuple if your custom error handling produced several messages or error codes, for cases where the traceback would be parsed programmatically (like via a system monitoring tool).

## Approach #1, if the exception may not be derived from Exception and well-behaved:

def to_int(x):
    try:
        return int(x)
    except Exception as e:
        e.args = (e.args if e.args else tuple()) + ('Custom message',)
        raise

>>> to_int('12')
12

>>> to_int('12 monkeys')
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
  File "<stdin>", line 3, in to_int
ValueError: ("invalid literal for int() with base 10: '12 monkeys'", 'Custom message')

or

## Approach #2, if the exception is always derived from Exception and well-behaved:

def to_int(x):
    try:
        return int(x)
    except Exception as e:
        e.args += ('Custom message',)
        raise

>>> to_int('12')
12

>>> to_int('12 monkeys')
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
  File "<stdin>", line 3, in to_int
ValueError: ("invalid literal for int() with base 10: '12 monkeys'", 'Custom message')

你能看出这种方法的缺点吗?


如果你足够幸运只支持python 3。X,这真的变成了一件美丽的事情:)

提高从

我们可以使用raise from链接异常。

try:
    1 / 0
except ZeroDivisionError as e:
    raise Exception('Smelly socks') from e

在这种情况下,调用者将捕获的异常具有引发异常的位置的行号。

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "test.py", line 2, in <module>
    1 / 0
ZeroDivisionError: division by zero

The above exception was the direct cause of the following exception:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "test.py", line 4, in <module>
    raise Exception('Smelly socks') from e
Exception: Smelly socks

注意,底部异常只有我们引发异常的堆栈跟踪。调用者仍然可以通过访问他们捕获的异常的__cause__属性来获得原始异常。

with_traceback

或者你可以使用with_traceback。

try:
    1 / 0
except ZeroDivisionError as e:
    raise Exception('Smelly socks').with_traceback(e.__traceback__)

使用这种形式,调用者将捕获的异常具有原始错误发生位置的回溯。

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "test.py", line 2, in <module>
    1 / 0
ZeroDivisionError: division by zero

During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "test.py", line 4, in <module>
    raise Exception('Smelly socks').with_traceback(e.__traceback__)
  File "test.py", line 2, in <module>
    1 / 0
Exception: Smelly socks

注意,底部的异常中有执行无效除法的行,也有重新引发异常的行。


当前的答案对我来说并不是很好,如果没有重新捕获异常,则不会显示附加的消息。

但是像下面这样做既保持跟踪,又显示附加的消息,不管是否重新捕获异常。

try:
  raise ValueError("Original message")
except ValueError as err:
  t, v, tb = sys.exc_info()
  raise t, ValueError(err.message + " Appended Info"), tb

(我使用Python 2.7,在Python 3中没有尝试过)


这是我在Python 2.7和3中用来修改异常消息的函数。X,同时保留原始的回溯。需要6个

def reraise_modify(caught_exc, append_msg, prepend=False):
    """Append message to exception while preserving attributes.

    Preserves exception class, and exception traceback.

    Note:
        This function needs to be called inside an except because
        `sys.exc_info()` requires the exception context.

    Args:
        caught_exc(Exception): The caught exception object
        append_msg(str): The message to append to the caught exception
        prepend(bool): If True prepend the message to args instead of appending

    Returns:
        None

    Side Effects:
        Re-raises the exception with the preserved data / trace but
        modified message
    """
    ExceptClass = type(caught_exc)
    # Keep old traceback
    traceback = sys.exc_info()[2]
    if not caught_exc.args:
        # If no args, create our own tuple
        arg_list = [append_msg]
    else:
        # Take the last arg
        # If it is a string
        # append your message.
        # Otherwise append it to the
        # arg list(Not as pretty)
        arg_list = list(caught_exc.args[:-1])
        last_arg = caught_exc.args[-1]
        if isinstance(last_arg, str):
            if prepend:
                arg_list.append(append_msg + last_arg)
            else:
                arg_list.append(last_arg + append_msg)
        else:
            arg_list += [last_arg, append_msg]
    caught_exc.args = tuple(arg_list)
    six.reraise(ExceptClass,
                caught_exc,
                traceback)

Python 3内置异常有strerror字段:

except ValueError as err:
  err.strerror = "New error message"
  raise err

使用的错误消息引发新的异常

raise Exception('your error message')

or

raise ValueError('your error message')

在你想要引发它或使用'from'将错误消息附加(替换)到当前异常的地方(Python 3。只支持X):

except ValueError as e:
  raise ValueError('your message') from e

上面的解决方案都没有完全满足我的要求,即在错误消息的第一部分添加一些信息,即我希望我的用户首先看到我的自定义消息。

这招对我很管用:

exception_raised = False
try:
    do_something_that_might_raise_an_exception()
except ValueError as e:
    message = str(e)
    exception_raised = True

if exception_raised:
    message_to_prepend = "Custom text"
    raise ValueError(message_to_prepend + message)

这只适用于Python 3。您可以修改异常的原始参数并添加自己的参数。

异常会记住创建它时使用的参数。我认为这样您就可以修改异常了。

在函数rerraise中,我们在异常的原始参数前加上我们想要的任何新参数(比如消息)。最后,我们在保留回溯历史的同时重新引发异常。

def reraise(e, *args):
  '''re-raise an exception with extra arguments
  :param e: The exception to reraise
  :param args: Extra args to add to the exception
  '''

  # e.args is a tuple of arguments that the exception with instantiated with.
  #
  e.args = args + e.args

  # Recreate the exception and preserve the traceback info so that we can see 
  # where this exception originated.
  #
  raise e.with_traceback(e.__traceback__)   


def bad():
  raise ValueError('bad')

def very():
  try:
    bad()
  except Exception as e:
    reraise(e, 'very')

def very_very():
  try:
    very()
  except Exception as e:
    reraise(e, 'very')

very_very()

输出

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "main.py", line 35, in <module>
    very_very()
  File "main.py", line 30, in very_very
    reraise(e, 'very')
  File "main.py", line 15, in reraise
    raise e.with_traceback(e.__traceback__)
  File "main.py", line 28, in very_very
    very()
  File "main.py", line 24, in very
    reraise(e, 'very')
  File "main.py", line 15, in reraise
    raise e.with_traceback(e.__traceback__)
  File "main.py", line 22, in very
    bad()
  File "main.py", line 18, in bad
    raise ValueError('bad')
ValueError: ('very', 'very', 'bad')

试试下面:

try:
    raise ValueError("Original message. ")
except Exception as err:
    message = 'My custom error message. '
    # Change the order below to "(message + str(err),)" if custom message is needed first. 
    err.args = (str(err) + message,)
    raise 

输出:

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ValueError                                Traceback (most recent call last)
      1 try:
----> 2     raise ValueError("Original message")
      3 except Exception as err:
      4     message = 'My custom error message.'
      5     err.args = (str(err) + ". " + message,)

ValueError: Original message. My custom error message.

上面提出的许多解决方案再次引发异常,这被认为是一种糟糕的做法。像这样简单的东西就可以了

try:
    import settings
except ModuleNotFoundError:
    print("Something meaningfull\n")
    raise 

因此,您将首先打印错误消息,然后引发堆栈跟踪,或者您可以简单地通过sys.exit(1)退出,而根本不显示错误消息。


我尝试了这个精简版的@RobinL,效果很好:

try:
    do_something_that_might_raise_an_exception()
except ValueError as e:
    raise ValueError(f'Custom text {e}')

引发相同的错误,并在前面添加自定义文本消息。 (编辑-抱歉,实际上和https://stackoverflow.com/a/65494175/15229310一样,为什么有10个(好评)“解决方案”只是不回答张贴的问题?)

    try:
       <code causing exception>
    except Exception as e:
        e.args = (f"My custom text. Original Exception text: {'-'.join(e.args)}",)
        raise