使用ES6模块(最初由@d13提出)对我来说效果很好。它不能完美地模拟私有属性，但至少您可以确信，应该是私有的属性不会泄漏到类之外。这里有一个例子:

something.js

let _message = null;
const _greet = name => {
  console.log('Hello ' + name);
};

export default class Something {
  constructor(message) {
    _message = message;
  }

  say() {
    console.log(_message);
    _greet('Bob');
  }
};

然后消费代码可以是这样的:

import Something from './something.js';

const something = new Something('Sunny day!');
something.say();
something._message; // undefined
something._greet(); // exception

更新(重要):

正如@DanyalAytekin在评论中概述的那样，这些私有属性是静态的，因此在全球范围内。它们在处理单例对象时工作得很好，但在处理瞬态对象时必须小心。扩展上面的例子:

import Something from './something.js';
import Something2 from './something.js';

const a = new Something('a');
a.say(); // a

const b = new Something('b');
b.say(); // b

const c = new Something2('c');
c.say(); // c

a.say(); // c
b.say(); // c
c.say(); // c

哦，这么多奇异的解决方案!我通常不关心隐私，所以我使用“伪隐私”，正如这里所说的。但如果确实关心(如果有一些特殊的要求)，我会在这个例子中使用:

class jobImpl{
  // public
  constructor(name){
    this.name = name;
  }
  // public
  do(time){
    console.log(`${this.name} started at ${time}`);
    this.prepare();
    this.execute();
  }
  //public
  stop(time){
    this.finish();
    console.log(`${this.name} finished at ${time}`);
  }
  // private
  prepare(){ console.log('prepare..'); }
  // private
  execute(){ console.log('execute..'); }
  // private
  finish(){ console.log('finish..'); }
}

function Job(name){
  var impl = new jobImpl(name);
  return {
    do: time => impl.do(time),
    stop: time => impl.stop(time)
  };
}

// Test:
// create class "Job"
var j = new Job("Digging a ditch");
// call public members..
j.do("08:00am");
j.stop("06:00pm");

// try to call private members or fields..
console.log(j.name); // undefined
j.execute(); // error

函数(构造函数)的另一种可能实现:

function Job(name){
  var impl = new jobImpl(name);
  this.do = time => impl.do(time),
  this.stop = time => impl.stop(time)
}

Yes totally can, and pretty easily too. This is done by exposing your private variables and functions by returning the prototype object graph in the constructor. This is nothing new, but take a bit of js foo to understand the elegance of it. This way does not use global scoped, or weakmaps. It is a form of reflection built into the language. Depending on how you leverage this; one can either force an exception which interrupts the call stack, or bury the exception as an undefined. This is demonstarted below, and can read more about these features here

class Clazz { constructor() { var _level = 1 function _private(x) { return _level * x; } return { level: _level, public: this.private, public2: function(x) { return _private(x); }, public3: function(x) { return _private(x) * this.public(x); }, }; } private(x) { return x * x; } } var clazz = new Clazz(); console.log(clazz._level); //undefined console.log(clazz._private); // undefined console.log(clazz.level); // 1 console.log(clazz.public(1)); //1 console.log(clazz.public2(2)); //2 console.log(clazz.public3(3)); //27 console.log(clazz.private(0)); //error

除了给出的答案之外，您还可以使用代理来创建“私有属性”，使代理只对公共代码可用。实例只对构造函数、绑定方法和作为接收者的Proxy本身可用。

这比使用符号和弱映射有一些优势。

符号是可枚举的，可以用代理捕获。 当实例被代理为实例时，WeakMaps失败!== new Proxy(instance)

WeakMap失败。

const map = new WeakMap()

const instance = new SomeClass()
map.set(instance, 'foo')
// somewhere along the way in 3rd party code
const proxy = new Proxy(instance, {})
assert(map.set(instance) === map.get(proxy)) // fail
const proxy2 = new Proxy(proxy, {})
// more headache

使用代理用私有道具验证来装饰实例

getProxy = (instance) => new Proxy(instance, {

    get: (target, name, receiver) => {
        console.log('get', { target, name, receiver })
        if (name[0] === '_') throw new Error('Cannot access private property ' + name)
        return Reflect.get(target, name, receiver) 
    },
    set: (target, name, value, receiver) => {
        console.log('set', { target, name, value, receiver })
        if (name[0] === '_') throw new Error('Cannot set private property ' + name)
        return Reflect.set(target, name, value, receiver) 
    }
    
})


class PublicClass {

    constructor() {
        Object.defineProperty(this, '_privateProp', { enumerable: false, writable: true, configurable: false })
        return getProxy(this) // can be moved out as a decorator
    }

    getPrivatePropFail() {
        return this._privateProp // fail
    }

    getPrivateProp = () => {
        return this._privateProp // ok
    }

    setPrivateProp = (value) => {
        return this._privateProp = value // ok
    }

}


pub = new PublicClass()

try {
    console.log('get pub._privateProp', pub._privateProp)
} catch(e) {
    console.error(e) 
}
try {
    console.log('set pub._privateProp', pub._privateProp = 'you fail')
} catch(e) {
    console.error(e) 
}
pub.setPrivateProp('you ok')
console.log('pub.getPrivateProp()', pub.getPrivateProp())
console.log('pub', Object.keys(pub))

这种方法的优点

私有属性访问验证被装饰在实例上(可选)。 私有属性可以在控制台、调试器和测试环境中检查，属性简单(没有符号或映射) 您可以控制验证和错误处理

的缺点

代理增加了开销和抽象级别 调试将显示包装对象的Proxy() 访问私有道具的方法需要是箭头函数 当无意中暴露实例时，可能会泄漏私有道具。添加一个方法getSelf = () => this

注:

考虑到开销，这种方法可以用于属性封装和调试的清晰度超过开销的场景。例如，当从存储中填充模型时。如。setjson (json)将确保没有私有道具被破坏。

通过使用WeakMap和Proxy来确保“私有”属性不可见，同时允许在每个作用域上使用相同实例访问WeakMap，可以进一步调整此方法以提供更好的封装。然而，这牺牲了可读性和调试。

来这个派对很晚，但我在搜索中碰到了OP问题，所以… 是的，您可以通过将类声明包装在闭包中来拥有私有属性

这里有一个我如何在这个代码依赖中拥有私有方法的例子。在下面的代码片段中，Subscribable类有两个“私有”函数process和processCallbacks。任何属性都可以以这种方式添加，并且通过使用闭包将它们保持为私有。如果关注点被很好地分离，并且Javascript不需要通过添加更多的语法而变得臃肿，当闭包整齐地完成工作时，隐私是一个罕见的需求。

const Subscribable = (function(){

  const process = (self, eventName, args) => {
    self.processing.set(eventName, setTimeout(() => processCallbacks(self, eventName, args)))};

  const processCallbacks = (self, eventName, args) => {
    if (self.callingBack.get(eventName).length > 0){
      const [nextCallback, ...callingBack] = self.callingBack.get(eventName);
      self.callingBack.set(eventName, callingBack);
      process(self, eventName, args);
      nextCallback(...args)}
    else {
      delete self.processing.delete(eventName)}};

  return class {
    constructor(){
      this.callingBack = new Map();
      this.processing = new Map();
      this.toCallbacks = new Map()}

    subscribe(eventName, callback){
      const callbacks = this.unsubscribe(eventName, callback);
      this.toCallbacks.set(eventName,  [...callbacks, callback]);
      return () => this.unsubscribe(eventName, callback)}  // callable to unsubscribe for convenience

    unsubscribe(eventName, callback){
      let callbacks = this.toCallbacks.get(eventName) || [];
      callbacks = callbacks.filter(subscribedCallback => subscribedCallback !== callback);
      if (callbacks.length > 0) {
        this.toCallbacks.set(eventName, callbacks)}
      else {
        this.toCallbacks.delete(eventName)}
      return callbacks}

    emit(eventName, ...args){
      this.callingBack.set(eventName, this.toCallbacks.get(eventName) || []);
      if (!this.processing.has(eventName)){
        process(this, eventName, args)}}}})();

我喜欢这种方法，因为它很好地分离了关注点，并保持了真正的私密性。唯一的缺点是需要使用'self'(或类似的东西)在私有内容中引用'this'。

就我个人而言，我喜欢绑定操作符::的建议，然后将其与@d13提到的解决方案结合起来，但现在坚持使用@d13的答案，在这里您为类使用export关键字，并将私有函数放在模块中。

还有一个棘手的解决方案，这里没有提到，下面是更实用的方法，将允许它在类中拥有所有的私有道具/方法。

Private.js

export const get = state => key => state[key];
export const set = state => (key,value) => { state[key] = value; }

. js

import { get, set } from './utils/Private'
export default class Test {
  constructor(initialState = {}) {
    const _set = this.set = set(initialState);
    const _get = this.get = get(initialState);

    this.set('privateMethod', () => _get('propValue'));
  }

  showProp() {
    return this.get('privateMethod')();
  }
}

let one = new Test({ propValue: 5});
let two = new Test({ propValue: 8});
two.showProp(); // 8
one.showProp(); // 5

请对此提出意见。