使用ES6模块(最初由@d13提出)对我来说效果很好。它不能完美地模拟私有属性，但至少您可以确信，应该是私有的属性不会泄漏到类之外。这里有一个例子:

something.js

let _message = null;
const _greet = name => {
  console.log('Hello ' + name);
};

export default class Something {
  constructor(message) {
    _message = message;
  }

  say() {
    console.log(_message);
    _greet('Bob');
  }
};

然后消费代码可以是这样的:

import Something from './something.js';

const something = new Something('Sunny day!');
something.say();
something._message; // undefined
something._greet(); // exception

更新(重要):

正如@DanyalAytekin在评论中概述的那样，这些私有属性是静态的，因此在全球范围内。它们在处理单例对象时工作得很好，但在处理瞬态对象时必须小心。扩展上面的例子:

import Something from './something.js';
import Something2 from './something.js';

const a = new Something('a');
a.say(); // a

const b = new Something('b');
b.say(); // b

const c = new Something2('c');
c.say(); // c

a.say(); // c
b.say(); // c
c.say(); // c

这取决于你问谁:-)

最大最小类提案中没有包含私有属性修饰符，这似乎已经进入了当前的草案。

但是，可能会支持私有名称，它允许私有属性—而且它们可能也可以用于类定义中。

我有一个解决办法，它很简单…虽然性能不是问题…但它确实有效，而且效果很好。

诀窍在于，在私有属性和函数被建立和标准化/采用之前，需要另一种解决方案，这是另一种解决方案…

class ClassPrivateProperties {
    constructor(instance) {
        const $this = instance;
        let properties = {};
        this.prop = (key, value = undefined) => {
            if (!value) {
                return properties[key];
            } else {
                properties[key] = value;
            }
        };
        this.clear = instance => {
            if ($this === instance) {
                properties = {};
                return true;
            } else {
                return false;
            }
        }
    }
}

这是一个示例用法，可以是什么(如果你使用上面的感觉自由，使它更好)

class Test {
    constructor() {
        this._privateProps = new ClassPrivateProperties(this);
    }
    property(key, value = undefined) {
        if (!value) {
            return this._privateProps.prop(key);
        } else {
            this._privateProps.prop(key, value);
        }
    }
    clear() { return this._privateProps.clear(this); }
}
const test = new test;
test.property('myKey','some value here');
console.log(test.property('myKey'));

就像我提到的，这个问题不是最好的，但它工作，使属性真正的私有。

事实上，使用符号和代理是可能的。您可以使用类作用域中的符号，并在代理中设置两个陷阱:一个用于类原型，以便Reflect.ownKeys(实例)或Object。getOwnPropertySymbols不会泄露你的符号，另一个是构造函数本身，所以当调用new ClassName(attrs)时，返回的实例将被拦截，并有自己的属性符号被阻塞。 代码如下:

const Human = (function() { const pet = Symbol(); const greet = Symbol(); const Human = privatizeSymbolsInFn(function(name) { this.name = name; // public this[pet] = 'dog'; // private }); Human.prototype = privatizeSymbolsInObj({ [greet]() { // private return 'Hi there!'; }, revealSecrets() { console.log(this[greet]() + ` The pet is a ${this[pet]}`); } }); return Human; })(); const bob = new Human('Bob'); console.assert(bob instanceof Human); console.assert(Reflect.ownKeys(bob).length === 1) // only ['name'] console.assert(Reflect.ownKeys(Human.prototype).length === 1 ) // only ['revealSecrets'] // Setting up the traps inside proxies: function privatizeSymbolsInObj(target) { return new Proxy(target, { ownKeys: Object.getOwnPropertyNames }); } function privatizeSymbolsInFn(Class) { function construct(TargetClass, argsList) { const instance = new TargetClass(...argsList); return privatizeSymbolsInObj(instance); } return new Proxy(Class, { construct }); }

Reflect.ownKeys()是这样工作的:Object.getOwnPropertyNames(myObj).concat(Object.getOwnPropertySymbols(myObj))这就是为什么我们需要为这些对象设置一个陷阱。

Yes totally can, and pretty easily too. This is done by exposing your private variables and functions by returning the prototype object graph in the constructor. This is nothing new, but take a bit of js foo to understand the elegance of it. This way does not use global scoped, or weakmaps. It is a form of reflection built into the language. Depending on how you leverage this; one can either force an exception which interrupts the call stack, or bury the exception as an undefined. This is demonstarted below, and can read more about these features here

class Clazz { constructor() { var _level = 1 function _private(x) { return _level * x; } return { level: _level, public: this.private, public2: function(x) { return _private(x); }, public3: function(x) { return _private(x) * this.public(x); }, }; } private(x) { return x * x; } } var clazz = new Clazz(); console.log(clazz._level); //undefined console.log(clazz._private); // undefined console.log(clazz.level); // 1 console.log(clazz.public(1)); //1 console.log(clazz.public2(2)); //2 console.log(clazz.public3(3)); //27 console.log(clazz.private(0)); //error

WeakMap

IE11支持(符号不支持) hard-private(由于Object.getOwnPropertySymbols，使用符号的道具是soft-private) 看起来非常干净(不像闭包需要构造函数中的所有道具和方法)

首先，定义一个函数来包装WeakMap:

function Private() {
  const map = new WeakMap();
  return obj => {
    let props = map.get(obj);
    if (!props) {
      props = {};
      map.set(obj, props);
    }
    return props;
  };
}

然后，在类外部构造一个引用:

const p = new Private();

class Person {
  constructor(name, age) {
    this.name = name;
    p(this).age = age; // it's easy to set a private variable
  }

  getAge() {
    return p(this).age; // and get a private variable
  }
}

注意:IE11不支持class，但在示例中它看起来更简洁。