我们可以使用getter和setter来模拟类的私有属性。

eg 1

class FootballClub {
    constructor (cname, cstadium, ccurrentmanager) {
        this.name = cname;
        this._stadium  = cstadium;  //  we will treat this prop as private and give getter and setter for this.
        this.currmanager = ccurrentmanager;
    }

    get stadium( ) {
        return this._stadium.toUpperCase();
    }

}

let club = new FootballClub("Arsenal", "Emirates" , "Arteta")
console.log(club);
//FootballClub {
//    name: 'Arsenal',
//    _stadium: 'Emirates',
//    currmanager: 'Arteta'
//  }
console.log( club.stadium ); // EMIRATES
club.stadium = "Highbury"; // TypeError: Cannot set property stadium of #<FootballClub> which has only a getter

在上面的例子中，我们没有给出stadium的setter方法，因此我们不能为它设置一个新值。在接下来的例子中，为体育场添加了一个setter

eg 2

class FootballClub {
    constructor (cname, cstadium, ccurrentmanager) {
        this.name = cname;
        this._stadium  = cstadium;  //  we will treat this prop as private and give getter and setter for this.
        this.currmanager = ccurrentmanager;
    }

    get stadium( ) {
        return this._stadium.toUpperCase();
    }

    set stadium(val) {
       this._stadium = val;
    }
}

let club = new FootballClub("Arsenal", "Emirates" , "Arteta")
console.log(club.stadium); // EMIRATES
club.stadium = "Emirates Stadium";
console.log(club.stadium); // EMIRATES STADIUM

class Something {
  constructor(){
    var _property = "test";
    Object.defineProperty(this, "property", {
        get: function(){ return _property}
    });
  }
}

var instance = new Something();
console.log(instance.property); //=> "test"
instance.property = "can read from outside, but can't write";
console.log(instance.property); //=> "test"

完成@d13和@johnny-oshika和@DanyalAytekin的评论:

我想在@johnny-oshika提供的例子中，我们可以使用普通函数而不是箭头函数，然后用当前对象加上_privates对象作为curry形参。

something.js

function _greet(_privates) {
  return 'Hello ' + _privates.message;
}

function _updateMessage(_privates, newMessage) {
  _privates.message = newMessage;
}

export default class Something {
  constructor(message) {
    const _privates = {
      message
    };

    this.say = _greet.bind(this, _privates);
    this.updateMessage = _updateMessage.bind(this, _privates);
  }
}

main.js

import Something from './something.js';

const something = new Something('Sunny day!');

const message1 = something.say();
something.updateMessage('Cloudy day!');
const message2 = something.say();

console.log(message1 === 'Hello Sunny day!');  // true
console.log(message2 === 'Hello Cloudy day!');  // true

// the followings are not public
console.log(something._greet === undefined);  // true
console.log(something._privates === undefined);  // true
console.log(something._updateMessage === undefined);  // true

// another instance which doesn't share the _privates
const something2 = new Something('another Sunny day!');

const message3 = something2.say();

console.log(message3 === 'Hello another Sunny day!'); // true

我能想到的好处:

我们可以有私有方法(_greet和_updateMessage就像私有方法一样，只要我们不导出引用) 尽管它们不在原型上，但上面提到的方法将节省内存，因为实例只在类外部创建一次(而不是在构造函数中定义它们)。 我们不会泄露任何全局变量，因为我们是在一个模块内 我们还可以使用binding _privates对象拥有私有属性

我能想到的一些缺点:

更直观的 混合使用类语法和老式模式(对象绑定、模块/函数作用域变量) 硬绑定——我们不能重新绑定公共方法(尽管我们可以通过使用软绑定来改进这一点(https://github.com/getify/You-Dont-Know-JS/blob/master/this%20%26%20object%20prototypes/ch2.md#softening-binding))。

一个运行的片段可以在这里找到:http://www.webpackbin.com/NJgI5J8lZ

哦，这么多奇异的解决方案!我通常不关心隐私，所以我使用“伪隐私”，正如这里所说的。但如果确实关心(如果有一些特殊的要求)，我会在这个例子中使用:

class jobImpl{
  // public
  constructor(name){
    this.name = name;
  }
  // public
  do(time){
    console.log(`${this.name} started at ${time}`);
    this.prepare();
    this.execute();
  }
  //public
  stop(time){
    this.finish();
    console.log(`${this.name} finished at ${time}`);
  }
  // private
  prepare(){ console.log('prepare..'); }
  // private
  execute(){ console.log('execute..'); }
  // private
  finish(){ console.log('finish..'); }
}

function Job(name){
  var impl = new jobImpl(name);
  return {
    do: time => impl.do(time),
    stop: time => impl.stop(time)
  };
}

// Test:
// create class "Job"
var j = new Job("Digging a ditch");
// call public members..
j.do("08:00am");
j.stop("06:00pm");

// try to call private members or fields..
console.log(j.name); // undefined
j.execute(); // error

函数(构造函数)的另一种可能实现:

function Job(name){
  var impl = new jobImpl(name);
  this.do = time => impl.do(time),
  this.stop = time => impl.stop(time)
}

正如我们所知，ES6类不支持私有属性。

下面是我使用的方法(可能会有帮助)。基本上，我是在工厂内部包装一个类。

function Animal(name) {
    const privateData = 'NO experiments on animals have been done!';

    class Animal {
        constructor(_name) {
            this.name = _name;
        }
        getName() {
            return this.name
        }
        getDisclamer() {
            return `${privateData} Including ${this.name}`
        }
    }
    return new Animal(name)
}

我是一个初学者，所以很高兴听到这是一个坏的方法。

我相信在构造函数中使用闭包是可能获得“两全其美”的。有两种变化:

所有数据成员都是私有的

函数myFunc() { console.log(' x的值:' + this.x); this.myPrivateFunc (); ｝ 函数myPrivateFunc() { console.log(' x的增强值:' +(此。X + 1)); ｝ 类测试{ 构造函数(){ Let internal = { X: 2， }; 内部的。myPrivateFunc = myPrivateFunc.bind(内部); 这一点。myFunc = myFunc.bind(内部); ｝ };

有些成员是私有的

注意:这确实很难看。如果您知道更好的解决方案，请编辑此回复。

function myFunc(priv, pub) { pub.y = 3; // The Test object now gets a member 'y' with value 3. console.log('Value of x: ' + priv.x); this.myPrivateFunc(); } function myPrivateFunc() { pub.z = 5; // The Test object now gets a member 'z' with value 3. console.log('Enhanced value of x: ' + (priv.x + 1)); } class Test { constructor() { let self = this; let internal = { x : 2, }; internal.myPrivateFunc = myPrivateFunc.bind(null, internal, self); this.myFunc = myFunc.bind(null, internal, self); } };