我们可以使用getter和setter来模拟类的私有属性。

eg 1

class FootballClub {
    constructor (cname, cstadium, ccurrentmanager) {
        this.name = cname;
        this._stadium  = cstadium;  //  we will treat this prop as private and give getter and setter for this.
        this.currmanager = ccurrentmanager;
    }

    get stadium( ) {
        return this._stadium.toUpperCase();
    }

}

let club = new FootballClub("Arsenal", "Emirates" , "Arteta")
console.log(club);
//FootballClub {
//    name: 'Arsenal',
//    _stadium: 'Emirates',
//    currmanager: 'Arteta'
//  }
console.log( club.stadium ); // EMIRATES
club.stadium = "Highbury"; // TypeError: Cannot set property stadium of #<FootballClub> which has only a getter

在上面的例子中，我们没有给出stadium的setter方法，因此我们不能为它设置一个新值。在接下来的例子中，为体育场添加了一个setter

eg 2

class FootballClub {
    constructor (cname, cstadium, ccurrentmanager) {
        this.name = cname;
        this._stadium  = cstadium;  //  we will treat this prop as private and give getter and setter for this.
        this.currmanager = ccurrentmanager;
    }

    get stadium( ) {
        return this._stadium.toUpperCase();
    }

    set stadium(val) {
       this._stadium = val;
    }
}

let club = new FootballClub("Arsenal", "Emirates" , "Arteta")
console.log(club.stadium); // EMIRATES
club.stadium = "Emirates Stadium";
console.log(club.stadium); // EMIRATES STADIUM

现在大多数浏览器都支持私有类特性。

class Something {
  #property;

  constructor(){
    this.#property = "test";
  }

  #privateMethod() {
    return 'hello world';
  }

  getPrivateMessage() {
      return this.#property;
  }
}

const instance = new Something();
console.log(instance.property); //=> undefined
console.log(instance.privateMethod); //=> undefined
console.log(instance.getPrivateMessage()); //=> test
console.log(instance.#property); //=> Syntax error

来这个派对很晚，但我在搜索中碰到了OP问题，所以… 是的，您可以通过将类声明包装在闭包中来拥有私有属性

这里有一个我如何在这个代码依赖中拥有私有方法的例子。在下面的代码片段中，Subscribable类有两个“私有”函数process和processCallbacks。任何属性都可以以这种方式添加，并且通过使用闭包将它们保持为私有。如果关注点被很好地分离，并且Javascript不需要通过添加更多的语法而变得臃肿，当闭包整齐地完成工作时，隐私是一个罕见的需求。

const Subscribable = (function(){

  const process = (self, eventName, args) => {
    self.processing.set(eventName, setTimeout(() => processCallbacks(self, eventName, args)))};

  const processCallbacks = (self, eventName, args) => {
    if (self.callingBack.get(eventName).length > 0){
      const [nextCallback, ...callingBack] = self.callingBack.get(eventName);
      self.callingBack.set(eventName, callingBack);
      process(self, eventName, args);
      nextCallback(...args)}
    else {
      delete self.processing.delete(eventName)}};

  return class {
    constructor(){
      this.callingBack = new Map();
      this.processing = new Map();
      this.toCallbacks = new Map()}

    subscribe(eventName, callback){
      const callbacks = this.unsubscribe(eventName, callback);
      this.toCallbacks.set(eventName,  [...callbacks, callback]);
      return () => this.unsubscribe(eventName, callback)}  // callable to unsubscribe for convenience

    unsubscribe(eventName, callback){
      let callbacks = this.toCallbacks.get(eventName) || [];
      callbacks = callbacks.filter(subscribedCallback => subscribedCallback !== callback);
      if (callbacks.length > 0) {
        this.toCallbacks.set(eventName, callbacks)}
      else {
        this.toCallbacks.delete(eventName)}
      return callbacks}

    emit(eventName, ...args){
      this.callingBack.set(eventName, this.toCallbacks.get(eventName) || []);
      if (!this.processing.has(eventName)){
        process(this, eventName, args)}}}})();

我喜欢这种方法，因为它很好地分离了关注点，并保持了真正的私密性。唯一的缺点是需要使用'self'(或类似的东西)在私有内容中引用'this'。

答案是“不”。但是你可以像这样创建对属性的私有访问:

使用模块。模块中的所有内容都是私有的，除非使用export关键字将其设为公有。 在模块内部，使用函数闭包:http://www.kirupa.com/html5/closures_in_javascript.htm

(可以使用符号来确保隐私的建议在ES6规范的早期版本中是正确的，但现在不再是这样:https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2014-January/035604.html和https://stackoverflow.com/a/22280202/1282216。有关符号和隐私的详细讨论，请参阅:https://curiosity-driven.org/private-properties-in-javascript)

就我个人而言，我喜欢绑定操作符::的建议，然后将其与@d13提到的解决方案结合起来，但现在坚持使用@d13的答案，在这里您为类使用export关键字，并将私有函数放在模块中。

还有一个棘手的解决方案，这里没有提到，下面是更实用的方法，将允许它在类中拥有所有的私有道具/方法。

Private.js

export const get = state => key => state[key];
export const set = state => (key,value) => { state[key] = value; }

. js

import { get, set } from './utils/Private'
export default class Test {
  constructor(initialState = {}) {
    const _set = this.set = set(initialState);
    const _get = this.get = get(initialState);

    this.set('privateMethod', () => _get('propValue'));
  }

  showProp() {
    return this.get('privateMethod')();
  }
}

let one = new Test({ propValue: 5});
let two = new Test({ propValue: 8});
two.showProp(); // 8
one.showProp(); // 5

请对此提出意见。

我用这个模式，它总是对我有效

class Test { constructor(data) { class Public { constructor(prv) { // public function (must be in constructor on order to access "prv" variable) connectToDb(ip) { prv._db(ip, prv._err); } } // public function w/o access to "prv" variable log() { console.log("I'm logging"); } } // private variables this._data = data; this._err = function(ip) { console.log("could not connect to "+ip); } } // private function _db(ip, err) { if(!!ip) { console.log("connected to "+ip+", sending data '"+this.data+"'"); return true; } else err(ip); } } var test = new Test(10), ip = "185.167.210.49"; test.connectToDb(ip); // true test.log(); // I'm logging test._err(ip); // undefined test._db(ip, function() { console.log("You have got hacked!"); }); // undefined