是否可以在ES6类中创建私有属性?
举个例子。 如何阻止访问instance.property?
class Something {
constructor(){
this.property = "test";
}
}
var instance = new Something();
console.log(instance.property); //=> "test"
是否可以在ES6类中创建私有属性?
举个例子。 如何阻止访问instance.property?
class Something {
constructor(){
this.property = "test";
}
}
var instance = new Something();
console.log(instance.property); //=> "test"
当前回答
使用WeakMap可以在类中拥有私有方法。
根据MDN网络文档:
WeakMap对象是键/值对的集合,其中键仅为对象,值可以是任意值。 键中的对象引用是弱保存的,这意味着如果不再有对该对象的其他引用,则它们是垃圾收集(GC)的目标。
这是一个创建带有私有成员_items的Queue数据结构的例子,该成员_items包含一个数组。
const _items = new WeakMap();
class Queue {
constructor() {
_items.set(this, []);
}
enqueue( item) {
_items.get(this).push(item);
}
get count() {
return _items.get(this).length;
}
peek() {
const anArray = _items.get(this);
if( anArray.length == 0)
throw new Error('There are no items in array!');
if( anArray.length > 0)
return anArray[0];
}
dequeue() {
const anArray = _items.get(this);
if( anArray.length == 0)
throw new Error('There are no items in array!');
if( anArray.length > 0)
return anArray.splice(0, 1)[0];
}
}
使用的例子:
const c = new Queue();
c.enqueue("one");
c.enqueue("two");
c.enqueue("three");
c.enqueue("four");
c.enqueue("five");
console.log(c);
私有成员_items是隐藏的,不能在Queue对象的属性或方法中看到:
然而,Queue对象中的私有成员_items可以通过以下方式访问:
const anArray = _items.get(this);
其他回答
是的-你可以创建封装的属性,但它没有与访问修饰符(公共|私有)至少不是与ES6。
下面是一个简单的例子,如何用ES6完成:
用类词创建类
2在构造函数内部使用let OR const保留字声明块作用域变量->因为它们是块作用域,所以不能从外部访问(封装)
为了允许对这些变量进行一些访问控制(setter |getter),你可以在它的构造函数中使用:this.methodName=function(){}语法声明实例方法
"use strict";
class Something{
constructor(){
//private property
let property="test";
//private final (immutable) property
const property2="test2";
//public getter
this.getProperty2=function(){
return property2;
}
//public getter
this.getProperty=function(){
return property;
}
//public setter
this.setProperty=function(prop){
property=prop;
}
}
}
现在让我们检查一下:
var s=new Something();
console.log(typeof s.property);//undefined
s.setProperty("another");//set to encapsulated `property`
console.log(s.getProperty());//get encapsulated `property` value
console.log(s.getProperty2());//get encapsulated immutable `property2` value
我们可以使用getter和setter来模拟类的私有属性。
eg 1
class FootballClub {
constructor (cname, cstadium, ccurrentmanager) {
this.name = cname;
this._stadium = cstadium; // we will treat this prop as private and give getter and setter for this.
this.currmanager = ccurrentmanager;
}
get stadium( ) {
return this._stadium.toUpperCase();
}
}
let club = new FootballClub("Arsenal", "Emirates" , "Arteta")
console.log(club);
//FootballClub {
// name: 'Arsenal',
// _stadium: 'Emirates',
// currmanager: 'Arteta'
// }
console.log( club.stadium ); // EMIRATES
club.stadium = "Highbury"; // TypeError: Cannot set property stadium of #<FootballClub> which has only a getter
在上面的例子中,我们没有给出stadium的setter方法,因此我们不能为它设置一个新值。在接下来的例子中,为体育场添加了一个setter
eg 2
class FootballClub {
constructor (cname, cstadium, ccurrentmanager) {
this.name = cname;
this._stadium = cstadium; // we will treat this prop as private and give getter and setter for this.
this.currmanager = ccurrentmanager;
}
get stadium( ) {
return this._stadium.toUpperCase();
}
set stadium(val) {
this._stadium = val;
}
}
let club = new FootballClub("Arsenal", "Emirates" , "Arteta")
console.log(club.stadium); // EMIRATES
club.stadium = "Emirates Stadium";
console.log(club.stadium); // EMIRATES STADIUM
来这个派对很晚,但我在搜索中碰到了OP问题,所以… 是的,您可以通过将类声明包装在闭包中来拥有私有属性
这里有一个我如何在这个代码依赖中拥有私有方法的例子。在下面的代码片段中,Subscribable类有两个“私有”函数process和processCallbacks。任何属性都可以以这种方式添加,并且通过使用闭包将它们保持为私有。如果关注点被很好地分离,并且Javascript不需要通过添加更多的语法而变得臃肿,当闭包整齐地完成工作时,隐私是一个罕见的需求。
const Subscribable = (function(){
const process = (self, eventName, args) => {
self.processing.set(eventName, setTimeout(() => processCallbacks(self, eventName, args)))};
const processCallbacks = (self, eventName, args) => {
if (self.callingBack.get(eventName).length > 0){
const [nextCallback, ...callingBack] = self.callingBack.get(eventName);
self.callingBack.set(eventName, callingBack);
process(self, eventName, args);
nextCallback(...args)}
else {
delete self.processing.delete(eventName)}};
return class {
constructor(){
this.callingBack = new Map();
this.processing = new Map();
this.toCallbacks = new Map()}
subscribe(eventName, callback){
const callbacks = this.unsubscribe(eventName, callback);
this.toCallbacks.set(eventName, [...callbacks, callback]);
return () => this.unsubscribe(eventName, callback)} // callable to unsubscribe for convenience
unsubscribe(eventName, callback){
let callbacks = this.toCallbacks.get(eventName) || [];
callbacks = callbacks.filter(subscribedCallback => subscribedCallback !== callback);
if (callbacks.length > 0) {
this.toCallbacks.set(eventName, callbacks)}
else {
this.toCallbacks.delete(eventName)}
return callbacks}
emit(eventName, ...args){
this.callingBack.set(eventName, this.toCallbacks.get(eventName) || []);
if (!this.processing.has(eventName)){
process(this, eventName, args)}}}})();
我喜欢这种方法,因为它很好地分离了关注点,并保持了真正的私密性。唯一的缺点是需要使用'self'(或类似的东西)在私有内容中引用'this'。
你可以试试这个https://www.npmjs.com/package/private-members
这个包将按实例保存成员。
const pvt = require('private-members');
const _ = pvt();
let Exemplo = (function () {
function Exemplo() {
_(this).msg = "Minha Mensagem";
}
_().mensagem = function() {
return _(this).msg;
}
Exemplo.prototype.showMsg = function () {
let msg = _(this).mensagem();
console.log(msg);
};
return Exemplo;
})();
module.exports = Exemplo;
class Something {
constructor(){
var _property = "test";
Object.defineProperty(this, "property", {
get: function(){ return _property}
});
}
}
var instance = new Something();
console.log(instance.property); //=> "test"
instance.property = "can read from outside, but can't write";
console.log(instance.property); //=> "test"