补充另一种深奥的方法，这也很有效:

var obj = {a: 1, b:2, c:3}
var newobj = {a,c}=obj && {a,c}
// {a: 1, c:3}

但是你必须把道具名写两遍。

只是另一种方式……

var elmo = { 
  color: 'red',
  annoying: true,
  height: 'unknown',
  meta: { one: '1', two: '2'}
}

var subset = [elmo].map(x => ({
  color: x.color,
  height: x.height
}))[0]

你可以在Objects =)数组中使用这个函数

我建议看看Lodash;它有很多实用函数。

例如，pick()就是你要找的东西:

var subset = _.pick(elmo, ['color', 'height']);

小提琴

我想在这里提到一个非常好的策展:

pick-es2019.js

Object.fromEntries(
  Object.entries(obj)
  .filter(([key]) => ['whitelisted', 'keys'].includes(key))
);

pick-es2017.js

Object.entries(obj)
.filter(([key]) => ['whitelisted', 'keys'].includes(key))
.reduce((obj, [key, val]) => Object.assign(obj, { [key]: val }), {});

pick-es2015.js

Object.keys(obj)
.filter((key) => ['whitelisted', 'keys'].indexOf(key) >= 0)
.reduce((newObj, key) => Object.assign(newObj, { [key]: obj[key] }), {})

omit-es2019.js

Object.fromEntries(
  Object.entries(obj)
  .filter(([key]) => !['blacklisted', 'keys'].includes(key))
);

omit-es2017.js

Object.entries(obj)
.filter(([key]) => !['blacklisted', 'keys'].includes(key))
.reduce((obj, [key, val]) => Object.assign(obj, { [key]: val }), {});

omit-es2015.js

Object.keys(obj)
.filter((key) => ['blacklisted', 'keys'].indexOf(key) < 0)
.reduce((newObj, key) => Object.assign(newObj, { [key]: obj[key] }), {})

虽然它有点啰嗦，但通过使用Array.prototype.reduce，你可以完成其他人在2年前推荐的underscore/lodash。

var subset = ['color', 'height'].reduce(function(o, k) { o[k] = elmo[k]; return o; }, {});

这种方法从另一方面解决了这个问题:而不是获取一个对象并将属性名传递给它来提取，而是获取一个属性名数组并将它们简化为一个新对象。

While it's more verbose in the simplest case, a callback here is pretty handy, since you can easily meet some common requirements, e.g. change the 'color' property to 'colour' on the new object, flatten arrays, etc. -- any of the things you need to do when receiving an object from one service/library and building a new object needed somewhere else. While underscore/lodash are excellent, well-implemented libs, this is my preferred approach for less vendor-reliance, and a simpler, more consistent approach when my subset-building logic gets more complex.

编辑:es7版本相同:

const subset = ['color', 'height'].reduce((a, e) => (a[e] = elmo[e], a), {});

编辑:这也是咖喱的一个很好的例子!让'pick'函数返回另一个函数。

const pick = (...props) => o => props.reduce((a, e) => ({ ...a, [e]: o[e] }), {});

上面的方法非常接近于另一种方法，除了它让你在运行中构建一个“picker”。如。

pick('color', 'height')(elmo);

这种方法的特别之处在于，你可以很容易地将所选的“picks”传递到任何带有函数的对象中，例如Array#map:

[elmo, grover, bigBird].map(pick('color', 'height'));
// [
//   { color: 'red', height: 'short' },
//   { color: 'blue', height: 'medium' },
//   { color: 'yellow', height: 'tall' },
// ]

这适用于我在Chrome控制台。有什么问题吗?

var { color, height } = elmo
var subelmo = { color, height }
console.log(subelmo) // {color: "red", height: "unknown"}