严格相等运算符将告诉您两个对象类型是否相等。然而,是否有一种方法来判断两个对象是否相等,就像Java中的哈希码值一样?
堆栈溢出问题JavaScript中有hashCode函数吗?类似于这个问题,但需要一个更学术的答案。上面的场景说明了为什么有必要有一个,我想知道是否有等效的解决方案。
严格相等运算符将告诉您两个对象类型是否相等。然而,是否有一种方法来判断两个对象是否相等,就像Java中的哈希码值一样?
堆栈溢出问题JavaScript中有hashCode函数吗?类似于这个问题,但需要一个更学术的答案。上面的场景说明了为什么有必要有一个,我想知道是否有等效的解决方案。
当前回答
如果你真的想比较并返回两个对象的差值。 您可以使用这个包:https://www.npmjs.com/package/deep-diff
或者只使用这个包使用的代码
https://github.com/flitbit/diff/blob/master/index.js
只是不要把它转换成字符串进行比较。
其他回答
这取决于你对平等的定义。因此,作为类的开发人员,要由您来定义它们的相等性。
有时会使用一种情况,如果两个实例指向内存中的相同位置,则认为它们是“相等的”,但这并不总是您想要的。例如,如果我有一个Person类,如果两个Person对象具有相同的Last Name、First Name和Social Security Number(即使它们指向内存中的不同位置),我可能会认为它们是“相等的”。
另一方面,我们不能简单地说两个对象是相等的,如果它们的每个成员的值都相同,因为,有时,你并不想这样。换句话说,对于每个类,由类开发人员定义组成对象“标识”的成员并开发适当的相等操作符(通过重载==操作符或Equals方法)。
Saying that two objects are equal if they have the same hash is one way out. However you then have to wonder how the hash is calculated for each instance. Going back to the Person example above, we could use this system if the hash was calculated by looking at the values of the First Name, Last Name, and Social Security Number fields. On top of that, we are then relying on the quality of the hashing method (that's a huge topic on its own, but suffice it to say that not all hashes are created equal, and bad hashing methods can lead to more collisions, which in this case would return false matches).
我的版本,包括发现差异的地方,以及差异是什么。
function DeepObjectCompare(O1, O2)
{
try {
DOC_Val(O1, O2, ['O1->O2', O1, O2]);
return DOC_Val(O2, O1, ['O2->O1', O1, O2]);
} catch(e) {
console.log(e.Chain);
throw(e);
}
}
function DOC_Error(Reason, Chain, Val1, Val2)
{
this.Reason=Reason;
this.Chain=Chain;
this.Val1=Val1;
this.Val2=Val2;
}
function DOC_Val(Val1, Val2, Chain)
{
function DoThrow(Reason, NewChain) { throw(new DOC_Error(Reason, NewChain!==undefined ? NewChain : Chain, Val1, Val2)); }
if(typeof(Val1)!==typeof(Val2))
return DoThrow('Type Mismatch');
if(Val1===null || Val1===undefined)
return Val1!==Val2 ? DoThrow('Null/undefined mismatch') : true;
if(Val1.constructor!==Val2.constructor)
return DoThrow('Constructor mismatch');
switch(typeof(Val1))
{
case 'object':
for(var m in Val1)
{
if(!Val1.hasOwnProperty(m))
continue;
var CurChain=Chain.concat([m]);
if(!Val2.hasOwnProperty(m))
return DoThrow('Val2 missing property', CurChain);
DOC_Val(Val1[m], Val2[m], CurChain);
}
return true;
case 'number':
if(Number.isNaN(Val1))
return !Number.isNaN(Val2) ? DoThrow('NaN mismatch') : true;
case 'string':
case 'boolean':
return Val1!==Val2 ? DoThrow('Value mismatch') : true;
case 'function':
if(Val1.prototype!==Val2.prototype)
return DoThrow('Prototype mismatch');
if(Val1!==Val2)
return DoThrow('Function mismatch');
return true;
default:
return DoThrow('Val1 is unknown type');
}
}
你是在测试两个对象是否相等吗?即:它们的属性是相等的?
如果是这样的话,你可能会注意到这种情况:
var a = { foo : "bar" };
var b = { foo : "bar" };
alert (a == b ? "Equal" : "Not equal");
// "Not equal"
你可能需要这样做:
function objectEquals(obj1, obj2) {
for (var i in obj1) {
if (obj1.hasOwnProperty(i)) {
if (!obj2.hasOwnProperty(i)) return false;
if (obj1[i] != obj2[i]) return false;
}
}
for (var i in obj2) {
if (obj2.hasOwnProperty(i)) {
if (!obj1.hasOwnProperty(i)) return false;
if (obj1[i] != obj2[i]) return false;
}
}
return true;
}
显然,该函数可以进行相当多的优化,并能够进行深度检查(处理嵌套对象:var a = {foo: {fu: "bar"}}),但您可以理解。
正如FOR所指出的,你可能需要根据自己的目的进行调整,例如:不同的类可能对“equal”有不同的定义。如果您只是处理普通对象,上述方法可能就足够了,否则可以使用自定义MyClass.equals()函数。
function isEqual(obj1, obj2){
type1 = typeof(obj1);
type2 = typeof(obj2);
if(type1===type2){
switch (type1){
case "object": return JSON.stringify(obj1)===JSON.stringify(obj2);
case "function": return eval(obj1).toString()===eval(obj2).toString();
default: return obj1==obj2;
}
}
return false;
}//have not tried but should work.
从我的个人库中取出,我经常用它来工作。下面的函数是一个宽大的递归深度等号,它不检查
阶级平等 继承的值 价值观严格平等
我主要用这个来检查我是否得到了对各种API实现的相等的回复。可能会出现实现差异(如字符串与数字)和额外的空值。
它的实现非常简单(如果去掉所有注释的话)
/** Recursively check if both objects are equal in value *** *** This function is designed to use multiple methods from most probable *** (and in most cases) valid, to the more regid and complex method. *** *** One of the main principles behind the various check is that while *** some of the simpler checks such as == or JSON may cause false negatives, *** they do not cause false positives. As such they can be safely run first. *** *** # !Important Note: *** as this function is designed for simplified deep equal checks it is not designed *** for the following *** *** - Class equality, (ClassA().a = 1) maybe valid to (ClassB().b = 1) *** - Inherited values, this actually ignores them *** - Values being strictly equal, "1" is equal to 1 (see the basic equality check on this) *** - Performance across all cases. This is designed for high performance on the *** most probable cases of == / JSON equality. Consider bench testing, if you have *** more 'complex' requirments *** *** @param objA : First object to compare *** @param objB : 2nd object to compare *** @param .... : Any other objects to compare *** *** @returns true if all equals, or false if invalid *** *** @license Copyright by eugene@picoded.com, 2012. *** Licensed under the MIT license: http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT **/ function simpleRecusiveDeepEqual(objA, objB) { // Multiple comparision check //-------------------------------------------- var args = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments); if(args.length > 2) { for(var a=1; a<args.length; ++a) { if(!simpleRecusiveDeepEqual(args[a-1], args[a])) { return false; } } return true; } else if(args.length < 2) { throw "simpleRecusiveDeepEqual, requires atleast 2 arguments"; } // basic equality check, //-------------------------------------------- // if this succed the 2 basic values is equal, // such as numbers and string. // // or its actually the same object pointer. Bam // // Note that if string and number strictly equal is required // change the equality from ==, to === // if(objA == objB) { return true; } // If a value is a bsic type, and failed above. This fails var basicTypes = ["boolean", "number", "string"]; if( basicTypes.indexOf(typeof objA) >= 0 || basicTypes.indexOf(typeof objB) >= 0 ) { return false; } // JSON equality check, //-------------------------------------------- // this can fail, if the JSON stringify the objects in the wrong order // for example the following may fail, due to different string order: // // JSON.stringify( {a:1, b:2} ) == JSON.stringify( {b:2, a:1} ) // if(JSON.stringify(objA) == JSON.stringify(objB)) { return true; } // Array equality check //-------------------------------------------- // This is performed prior to iteration check, // Without this check the following would have been considered valid // // simpleRecusiveDeepEqual( { 0:1963 }, [1963] ); // // Note that u may remove this segment if this is what is intended // if( Array.isArray(objA) ) { //objA is array, objB is not an array if( !Array.isArray(objB) ) { return false; } } else if( Array.isArray(objB) ) { //objA is not array, objB is an array return false; } // Nested values iteration //-------------------------------------------- // Scan and iterate all the nested values, and check for non equal values recusively // // Note that this does not check against null equality, remove the various "!= null" // if this is required var i; //reuse var to iterate // Check objA values against objB for (i in objA) { //Protect against inherited properties if(objA.hasOwnProperty(i)) { if(objB.hasOwnProperty(i)) { // Check if deep equal is valid if(!simpleRecusiveDeepEqual( objA[i], objB[i] )) { return false; } } else if(objA[i] != null) { //ignore null values in objA, that objB does not have //else fails return false; } } } // Check if objB has additional values, that objA do not, fail if so for (i in objB) { if(objB.hasOwnProperty(i)) { if(objB[i] != null && !objA.hasOwnProperty(i)) { //ignore null values in objB, that objA does not have //else fails return false; } } } // End of all checks //-------------------------------------------- // By reaching here, all iteration scans have been done. // and should have returned false if it failed return true; } // Sanity checking of simpleRecusiveDeepEqual (function() { if( // Basic checks !simpleRecusiveDeepEqual({}, {}) || !simpleRecusiveDeepEqual([], []) || !simpleRecusiveDeepEqual(['a'], ['a']) || // Not strict checks !simpleRecusiveDeepEqual("1", 1) || // Multiple objects check !simpleRecusiveDeepEqual( { a:[1,2] }, { a:[1,2] }, { a:[1,2] } ) || // Ensure distinction between array and object (the following should fail) simpleRecusiveDeepEqual( [1963], { 0:1963 } ) || // Null strict checks simpleRecusiveDeepEqual( 0, null ) || simpleRecusiveDeepEqual( "", null ) || // Last "false" exists to make the various check above easy to comment in/out false ) { alert("FATAL ERROR: simpleRecusiveDeepEqual failed basic checks"); } else { //added this last line, for SO snippet alert on success alert("simpleRecusiveDeepEqual: Passed all checks, Yays!"); } })();