这是一个非常干净的CoffeeScript版本，你可以这样做:

Object::equals = (other) ->
  typeOf = Object::toString

  return false if typeOf.call(this) isnt typeOf.call(other)
  return `this == other` unless typeOf.call(other) is '[object Object]' or
                                typeOf.call(other) is '[object Array]'

  (return false unless this[key].equals other[key]) for key, value of this
  (return false if typeof this[key] is 'undefined') for key of other

  true

下面是测试:

  describe "equals", ->

    it "should consider two numbers to be equal", ->
      assert 5.equals(5)

    it "should consider two empty objects to be equal", ->
      assert {}.equals({})

    it "should consider two objects with one key to be equal", ->
      assert {a: "banana"}.equals {a: "banana"}

    it "should consider two objects with keys in different orders to be equal", ->
      assert {a: "banana", kendall: "garrus"}.equals {kendall: "garrus", a: "banana"}

    it "should consider two objects with nested objects to be equal", ->
      assert {a: {fruit: "banana"}}.equals {a: {fruit: "banana"}}

    it "should consider two objects with nested objects that are jumbled to be equal", ->
      assert {a: {a: "banana", kendall: "garrus"}}.equals {a: {kendall: "garrus", a: "banana"}}

    it "should consider two objects with arrays as values to be equal", ->
      assert {a: ["apple", "banana"]}.equals {a: ["apple", "banana"]}



    it "should not consider an object to be equal to null", ->
      assert !({a: "banana"}.equals null)

    it "should not consider two objects with different keys to be equal", ->
      assert !({a: "banana"}.equals {})

    it "should not consider two objects with different values to be equal", ->
      assert !({a: "banana"}.equals {a: "grapefruit"})

这是一个经典的javascript问题!我创建了一个方法来检查深度对象是否相等，其特性是能够从比较中选择要忽略的属性。 参数是要比较的两个对象，加上一个可选的字符串化属性-忽略相对路径数组。

function isObjectEqual( o1, o2, ignorePropsArr=[]) {
    // Deep Clone objects
    let _obj1 = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(o1)),
        _obj2 = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(o2));
    // Remove props to ignore
    ignorePropsArr.map( p => { 
        eval('_obj1.'+p+' = _obj2.'+p+' = "IGNORED"');
    });
    // compare as strings
    let s1 = JSON.stringify(_obj1),
        s2 = JSON.stringify(_obj2);
    // return [s1==s2,s1,s2];
    return s1==s2;
}

// Objects 0 and 1 are exact equals
obj0 = { price: 66544.10, RSIs: [0.000432334, 0.00046531], candles: {A: 543, B: 321, C: 4322}}
obj1 = { price: 66544.10, RSIs: [0.000432334, 0.00046531], candles: {A: 543, B: 321, C: 4322}}
obj2 = { price: 66544.12, RSIs: [0.000432334, 0.00046531], candles: {A: 543, B: 321, C: 4322}}
obj3 = { price: 66544.13, RSIs: [0.000432334, 0.00046531], candles: {A: 541, B: 321, C: 4322}}
obj4 = { price: 66544.14, RSIs: [0.000432334, 0.00046530], candles: {A: 543, B: 321, C: 4322}}

isObjectEqual(obj0,obj1) // true
isObjectEqual(obj0,obj2) // false
isObjectEqual(obj0,obj2,['price']) // true
isObjectEqual(obj0,obj3,['price']) // false
isObjectEqual(obj0,obj3,['price','candles.A']) // true
isObjectEqual(obj0,obj4,['price','RSIs[1]'])   // true

如果两个对象的所有属性都具有相同的值，并且所有嵌套对象和数组都递归地具有相同的值，那么将它们视为相等是很有用的。我也认为以下两个对象是相等的:

var a = {p1: 1};
var b = {p1: 1, p2: undefined};

类似地，数组可以有“缺失”元素和未定义的元素。我也会同样对待它们:

var c = [1, 2];
var d = [1, 2, undefined];

函数:实现等式定义的函数:

function isEqual(a, b) {
    if (a === b) {
        return true;
    }

    if (generalType(a) != generalType(b)) {
        return false;
    }

    if (a == b) {
        return true;
    }

    if (typeof a != 'object') {
        return false;
    }

    // null != {}
    if (a instanceof Object != b instanceof Object) {
        return false;
    }

    if (a instanceof Date || b instanceof Date) {
        if (a instanceof Date != b instanceof Date ||
            a.getTime() != b.getTime()) {
            return false;
        }
    }

    var allKeys = [].concat(keys(a), keys(b));
    uniqueArray(allKeys);

    for (var i = 0; i < allKeys.length; i++) {
        var prop = allKeys[i];
        if (!isEqual(a[prop], b[prop])) {
            return false;
        }
    }
    return true;
}

源代码(包括辅助函数，generalType和uniqueArray): 这里是单元测试和测试运行器。

function isEqual(obj1, obj2){
    type1 = typeof(obj1);
    type2 = typeof(obj2);
    if(type1===type2){
        switch (type1){
            case "object": return JSON.stringify(obj1)===JSON.stringify(obj2);
            case "function": return eval(obj1).toString()===eval(obj2).toString();
            default: return obj1==obj2;
        }
    }
    return false;
}//have not tried but should work.

下面的一些解决方案在性能、功能和风格方面存在问题……它们没有经过充分的考虑，其中一些在不同的情况下失败了。我试图在自己的解决方案中解决这个问题，我非常感谢您的反馈:

http://stamat.wordpress.com/javascript-object-comparison/

//Returns the object's class, Array, Date, RegExp, Object are of interest to us
var getClass = function(val) {
    return Object.prototype.toString.call(val)
        .match(/^\[object\s(.*)\]$/)[1];
};

//Defines the type of the value, extended typeof
var whatis = function(val) {

    if (val === undefined)
        return 'undefined';
    if (val === null)
        return 'null';

    var type = typeof val;

    if (type === 'object')
        type = getClass(val).toLowerCase();

    if (type === 'number') {
        if (val.toString().indexOf('.') > 0)
            return 'float';
        else
        return 'integer';
    }

    return type;
   };

var compareObjects = function(a, b) {
    if (a === b)
        return true;
    for (var i in a) {
        if (b.hasOwnProperty(i)) {
            if (!equal(a[i],b[i])) return false;
        } else {
            return false;
        }
    }

    for (var i in b) {
        if (!a.hasOwnProperty(i)) {
            return false;
        }
    }
    return true;
};

var compareArrays = function(a, b) {
    if (a === b)
        return true;
    if (a.length !== b.length)
        return false;
    for (var i = 0; i < a.length; i++){
        if(!equal(a[i], b[i])) return false;
    };
    return true;
};

var _equal = {};
_equal.array = compareArrays;
_equal.object = compareObjects;
_equal.date = function(a, b) {
    return a.getTime() === b.getTime();
};
_equal.regexp = function(a, b) {
    return a.toString() === b.toString();
};
//  uncoment to support function as string compare
//  _equal.fucntion =  _equal.regexp;



/*
 * Are two values equal, deep compare for objects and arrays.
 * @param a {any}
 * @param b {any}
 * @return {boolean} Are equal?
 */
var equal = function(a, b) {
    if (a !== b) {
        var atype = whatis(a), btype = whatis(b);

        if (atype === btype)
            return _equal.hasOwnProperty(atype) ? _equal[atype](a, b) : a==b;

        return false;
    }

    return true;
};

为了比较简单的键/值对对象实例的键，我使用:

function compareKeys(r1, r2) {
    var nloops = 0, score = 0;
    for(k1 in r1) {
        for(k2 in r2) {
            nloops++;
            if(k1 == k2)
                score++; 
        }
    }
    return nloops == (score * score);
};

一旦比较了键，一个简单的for. in循环就足够了。

复杂度是O(N*N)， N是键的个数。

我希望/猜测我定义的对象不会拥有超过1000个属性…