我发现解决这个问题的一个方法是将施工分离到一个单独的工厂。例如，我有一个名为IQueueItem的抽象类，我需要一种方法将该对象转换为另一个对象(CloudQueueMessage)。在IQueueItem接口上有-

public interface IQueueItem
{
    CloudQueueMessage ToMessage();
}

现在，我还需要一个方法为我的实际队列类转换一个CloudQueueMessage回IQueueItem -即需要一个静态结构，如IQueueItem objMessage = ItemType.FromMessage。相反，我定义了另一个接口IQueueFactory -

public interface IQueueItemFactory<T> where T : IQueueItem
{
    T FromMessage(CloudQueueMessage objMessage);
}

现在我终于可以在没有new()约束的情况下编写泛型队列类了，在我的例子中，new()约束是主要问题。

public class AzureQueue<T> where T : IQueueItem
{
    private IQueueItemFactory<T> _objFactory;
    public AzureQueue(IQueueItemFactory<T> objItemFactory)
    {
        _objFactory = objItemFactory;
    }


    public T GetNextItem(TimeSpan tsLease)
    {
        CloudQueueMessage objQueueMessage = _objQueue.GetMessage(tsLease);
        T objItem = _objFactory.FromMessage(objQueueMessage);
        return objItem;
    }
}

现在我可以创建一个满足条件的实例

 AzureQueue<Job> objJobQueue = new JobQueue(new JobItemFactory())

希望有一天这能帮助其他人解决问题，显然，为了显示问题和解决方案，删除了大量内部代码

强制某种构造函数的一种方法是在接口中只声明getter，这可能意味着实现类必须有一个方法，最好是一个构造函数，为它设置(私有的)值。

虽然您不能在接口中定义构造函数签名，但我觉得值得一提的是，这可能是考虑抽象类的一个地方。抽象类可以以与接口相同的方式定义未实现的(抽象的)方法签名，但也可以有实现的(具体的)方法和构造函数。

缺点是，因为它是一种类类型，所以它不能用于接口可以使用的任何多继承类型场景。

通用工厂方法似乎仍然是理想的。您将知道工厂需要一个形参，而这些形参恰好被传递给正在实例化的对象的构造函数。

注意，这只是经过语法验证的伪代码，这里可能忽略了一个运行时警告:

public interface IDrawableFactory
{
    TDrawable GetDrawingObject<TDrawable>(GraphicsDeviceManager graphicsDeviceManager) 
              where TDrawable: class, IDrawable, new();
}

public class DrawableFactory : IDrawableFactory
{
    public TDrawable GetDrawingObject<TDrawable>(GraphicsDeviceManager graphicsDeviceManager) 
                     where TDrawable : class, IDrawable, new()
    {
        return (TDrawable) Activator
                .CreateInstance(typeof(TDrawable), 
                                graphicsDeviceManager);
    }

}

public class Draw : IDrawable
{
 //stub
}

public class Update : IDrawable {
    private readonly GraphicsDeviceManager _graphicsDeviceManager;

    public Update() { throw new NotImplementedException(); }

    public Update(GraphicsDeviceManager graphicsDeviceManager)
    {
        _graphicsDeviceManager = graphicsDeviceManager;
    }
}

public interface IDrawable
{
    //stub
}
public class GraphicsDeviceManager
{
    //stub
}

一个可能用法的例子:

    public void DoSomething()
    {
        var myUpdateObject = GetDrawingObject<Update>(new GraphicsDeviceManager());
        var myDrawObject = GetDrawingObject<Draw>(null);
    }

当然，您只需要通过工厂创建实例来保证始终有一个适当初始化的对象。也许使用像AutoFac这样的依赖注入框架会有意义;Update()可以向IoC容器“请求”一个新的GraphicsDeviceManager对象。

接口的目的是强制某个对象签名。它不应该明确地关心对象内部如何工作。因此，从概念的角度来看，接口中的构造函数并没有真正的意义。

不过也有一些替代方案:

Create an abstract class that acts as a minimal default implementation. That class should have the constructors you expect implementing classes to have. If you don't mind the overkill, use the AbstractFactory pattern and declare a method in the factory class interface that has the required signatures. Pass the GraphicsDeviceManager as a parameter to the Update and Draw methods. Use a Compositional Object Oriented Programming framework to pass the GraphicsDeviceManager into the part of the object that requires it. This is a pretty experimental solution in my opinion.

你描述的情况一般来说不容易处理。业务应用程序中需要访问数据库的实体也有类似的情况。

我用下面的图案使它防弹。

A developer who derives his class from the base can't accidentally create a public accessible constructor The final class developer are forced to go through the common create method Everything is type-safe, no castings are required It's 100% flexible and can be reused everywhere, where you can define your own base class. Try it out you can't break it without making modifications to the base classes (except if you define an obsolete flag without error flag set to true, but even then you end up with a warning) public abstract class Base<TSelf, TParameter> where TSelf : Base<TSelf, TParameter>, new() { protected const string FactoryMessage = "Use YourClass.Create(...) instead"; public static TSelf Create(TParameter parameter) { var me = new TSelf(); me.Initialize(parameter); return me; } [Obsolete(FactoryMessage, true)] protected Base() { } protected virtual void Initialize(TParameter parameter) { } } public abstract class BaseWithConfig<TSelf, TConfig>: Base<TSelf, TConfig> where TSelf : BaseWithConfig<TSelf, TConfig>, new() { public TConfig Config { get; private set; } [Obsolete(FactoryMessage, true)] protected BaseWithConfig() { } protected override void Initialize(TConfig parameter) { this.Config = parameter; } } public class MyService : BaseWithConfig<MyService, (string UserName, string Password)> { [Obsolete(FactoryMessage, true)] public MyService() { } } public class Person : Base<Person, (string FirstName, string LastName)> { [Obsolete(FactoryMessage,true)] public Person() { } protected override void Initialize((string FirstName, string LastName) parameter) { this.FirstName = parameter.FirstName; this.LastName = parameter.LastName; } public string LastName { get; private set; } public string FirstName { get; private set; } } [Test] public void FactoryTest() { var notInitilaizedPerson = new Person(); // doesn't compile because of the obsolete attribute. Person max = Person.Create(("Max", "Mustermann")); Assert.AreEqual("Max",max.FirstName); var service = MyService.Create(("MyUser", "MyPassword")); Assert.AreEqual("MyUser", service.Config.UserName); }

编辑: 这是一个基于你的绘图示例的例子，它甚至强制了接口抽象

        public abstract class BaseWithAbstraction<TSelf, TInterface, TParameter>
        where TSelf : BaseWithAbstraction<TSelf, TInterface, TParameter>, TInterface, new()
    {
        [Obsolete(FactoryMessage, true)]
        protected BaseWithAbstraction()
        {
        }

        protected const string FactoryMessage = "Use YourClass.Create(...) instead";
        public static TInterface Create(TParameter parameter)
        {
            var me = new TSelf();
            me.Initialize(parameter);

            return me;
        }

        protected virtual void Initialize(TParameter parameter)
        {

        }
    }



    public abstract class BaseWithParameter<TSelf, TInterface, TParameter> : BaseWithAbstraction<TSelf, TInterface, TParameter>
        where TSelf : BaseWithParameter<TSelf, TInterface, TParameter>, TInterface, new()
    {
        protected TParameter Parameter { get; private set; }

        [Obsolete(FactoryMessage, true)]
        protected BaseWithParameter()
        {
        }
        protected sealed override void Initialize(TParameter parameter)
        {
            this.Parameter = parameter;
            this.OnAfterInitialize(parameter);
        }

        protected virtual void OnAfterInitialize(TParameter parameter)
        {
        }
    }


    public class GraphicsDeviceManager
    {

    }
    public interface IDrawable
    {
        void Update();
        void Draw();
    }

    internal abstract class Drawable<TSelf> : BaseWithParameter<TSelf, IDrawable, GraphicsDeviceManager>, IDrawable 
        where TSelf : Drawable<TSelf>, IDrawable, new()
    {
        [Obsolete(FactoryMessage, true)]
        protected Drawable()
        {
        }

        public abstract void Update();
        public abstract void Draw();
    }

    internal class Rectangle : Drawable<Rectangle>
    {
        [Obsolete(FactoryMessage, true)]
        public Rectangle()
        {
        }

        public override void Update()
        {
            GraphicsDeviceManager manager = this.Parameter;
            // TODo  manager
        }

        public override void Draw()
        {
            GraphicsDeviceManager manager = this.Parameter;
            // TODo  manager
        }
    }
    internal class Circle : Drawable<Circle>
    {
        [Obsolete(FactoryMessage, true)]
        public Circle()
        {
        }

        public override void Update()
        {
            GraphicsDeviceManager manager = this.Parameter;
            // TODo  manager
        }

        public override void Draw()
        {
            GraphicsDeviceManager manager = this.Parameter;
            // TODo  manager
        }
    }


    [Test]
    public void FactoryTest()
    {
        // doesn't compile because interface abstraction is enforced.
        Rectangle rectangle = Rectangle.Create(new GraphicsDeviceManager());

        // you get only the IDrawable returned.
        IDrawable service = Circle.Create(new GraphicsDeviceManager());
    }