除了C#/Java中的抽象基类之外，您还有一个特殊的接口类型类别，这是因为C#/Java不支持多重继承。

C++支持多重继承，因此不需要特殊类型。没有非抽象（纯虚拟）方法的抽象基类在功能上等同于C#/Java接口。

使用纯虚拟方法创建类。通过创建另一个重写这些虚拟方法的类来使用该接口。

纯虚拟方法是定义为虚拟并分配给0的类方法。

class IDemo
{
    public:
        virtual ~IDemo() {}
        virtual void OverrideMe() = 0;
};

class Child : public IDemo
{
    public:
        virtual void OverrideMe()
        {
            // do stuff
        }
};

除了C#/Java中的抽象基类之外，您还有一个特殊的接口类型类别，这是因为C#/Java不支持多重继承。

C++支持多重继承，因此不需要特殊类型。没有非抽象（纯虚拟）方法的抽象基类在功能上等同于C#/Java接口。

如果您只需要接口的静态绑定（没有虚拟的，没有接口类型本身的实例，接口仅作为指南）：

#include <iostream>
#include <string>

// Static binding interface
// Notice: instantiation of this interface should be usefuless and forbidden.
class IBase {
 protected:
  IBase() = default;
  ~IBase() = default;

 public:
  // Methods that must be implemented by the derived class
  void behaviorA();
  void behaviorB();

  void behaviorC() {
    std::cout << "This is an interface default implementation of bC().\n";
  };
};

class CCom : public IBase {
  std::string name_;

 public:
  void behaviorA() { std::cout << "CCom bA called.\n"; };
};

class CDept : public IBase {
  int ele_;

 public:
  void behaviorB() { std::cout << "CDept bB called.\n"; };
  void behaviorC() {
    // Overwrite the interface default implementation
    std::cout << "CDept bC called.\n";
    IBase::behaviorC();
  };
};

int main(void) {
  // Forbid the instantiation of the interface type itself.
  // GCC error: ‘constexpr IBase::IBase()’ is protected within this context
  // IBase o;

  CCom acom;
  // If you want to use these interface methods, you need to implement them in
  // your derived class. This is controled by the interface definition.
  acom.behaviorA();
  // ld: undefined reference to `IBase::behaviorB()'
  // acom.behaviorB();
  acom.behaviorC();

  CDept adept;
  // adept.behaviorA();
  adept.behaviorB();
  adept.behaviorC();
  // adept.IBase::behaviorC();
}

就我所能测试的而言，添加虚拟析构函数非常重要。我使用的是用new创建的对象，用delete销毁的对象。

如果不在接口中添加虚拟析构函数，则不会调用继承类的析构函数。

class IBase {
public:
    virtual ~IBase() {}; // destructor, use it to call destructor of the inherit classes
    virtual void Describe() = 0; // pure virtual method
};

class Tester : public IBase {
public:
    Tester(std::string name);
    virtual ~Tester();
    virtual void Describe();
private:
    std::string privatename;
};

Tester::Tester(std::string name) {
    std::cout << "Tester constructor" << std::endl;
    this->privatename = name;
}

Tester::~Tester() {
    std::cout << "Tester destructor" << std::endl;
}

void Tester::Describe() {
    std::cout << "I'm Tester [" << this->privatename << "]" << std::endl;
}


void descriptor(IBase * obj) {
    obj->Describe();
}

int main(int argc, char** argv) {

    std::cout << std::endl << "Tester Testing..." << std::endl;
    Tester * obj1 = new Tester("Declared with Tester");
    descriptor(obj1);
    delete obj1;

    std::cout << std::endl << "IBase Testing..." << std::endl;
    IBase * obj2 = new Tester("Declared with IBase");
    descriptor(obj2);
    delete obj2;

    // this is a bad usage of the object since it is created with "new" but there are no "delete"
    std::cout << std::endl << "Tester not defined..." << std::endl;
    descriptor(new Tester("Not defined"));


    return 0;
}

如果在没有virtual~IBase（）｛｝；的情况下运行前面的代码；，您将看到从未调用析构函数Tester:：~Tester（）。

您还可以考虑使用NVI（非虚拟接口模式）实现的合约类。例如：

struct Contract1 : boost::noncopyable
{
    virtual ~Contract1() = default;
    void f(Parameters p) {
        assert(checkFPreconditions(p)&&"Contract1::f, pre-condition failure");
        // + class invariants.
        do_f(p);
        // Check post-conditions + class invariants.
    }
private:
    virtual void do_f(Parameters p) = 0;
};
...
class Concrete : public Contract1, public Contract2
{
private:
    void do_f(Parameters p) override; // From contract 1.
    void do_g(Parameters p) override; // From contract 2.
};