我读过各种关于测试中模仿和存根的文章,包括Martin Fowler的《Mocks Aren't Stubs》,但我仍然不理解其中的区别。


当前回答

看了上面所有的解释,让我试着总结一下:

Stub:让测试运行的一段虚拟代码,但您并不关心它会发生什么。替代实际工作代码。 Mock:在测试中验证是否正确调用的一段虚拟代码。替代实际工作代码。 间谍:一段虚拟代码,用于拦截和验证对实际工作代码的某些调用,从而避免替换所有实际代码。

其他回答

下面是对每一个的描述,然后是真实世界的样本。

Dummy - just bogus values to satisfy the API. Example: If you're testing a method of a class which requires many mandatory parameters in a constructor which have no effect on your test, then you may create dummy objects for the purpose of creating new instances of a class. Fake - create a test implementation of a class which may have a dependency on some external infrastructure. (It's good practice that your unit test does NOT actually interact with external infrastructure.) Example: Create fake implementation for accessing a database, replace it with in-memory collection. Stub - override methods to return hard-coded values, also referred to as state-based. Example: Your test class depends on a method Calculate() taking 5 minutes to complete. Rather than wait for 5 minutes you can replace its real implementation with stub that returns hard-coded values; taking only a small fraction of the time. Mock - very similar to Stub but interaction-based rather than state-based. This means you don't expect from Mock to return some value, but to assume that specific order of method calls are made. Example: You're testing a user registration class. After calling Save, it should call SendConfirmationEmail.

存根和Mock实际上是Mock的子类型,两者都交换了实际实现和测试实现,但出于不同的、特定的原因。

存根不会让你考试不及格,mock可以。

Stub是实现组件接口的对象,但是Stub可以配置为返回适合测试的值,而不是返回调用时组件将返回的值。使用存根,单元测试可以测试一个单元是否可以处理来自合作者的各种返回值。在单元测试中使用存根而不是真正的合作者可以这样表示:

单元测试——>存根

单元测试——>单元——>存根

单元测试对结果和单元状态进行断言

首先,单元测试创建存根并配置其返回值。然后单元测试创建单元并在其上设置存根。现在,单元测试调用单元,而单元又调用存根。最后,单元测试对单元上的方法调用的结果进行断言。

A Mock is like a stub, only it also has methods that make it possible determine what methods where called on the Mock. Using a mock it is thus possible to both test if the unit can handle various return values correctly, and also if the unit uses the collaborator correctly. For instance, you cannot see by the value returned from a dao object whether the data was read from the database using a Statement or a PreparedStatement. Nor can you see if the connection.close() method was called before returning the value. This is possible with mocks. In other words, mocks makes it possible to test a units complete interaction with a collaborator. Not just the collaborator methods that return values used by the unit. Using a mock in a unit test could be expressed like this:

单元测试——>模拟

单元测试—>单元—>模拟

单元测试对单元的结果和状态进行断言

单元测试断言在mock上调用的方法

>>这里

使用一个心智模型确实帮助我理解了这一点,而不是所有的解释和文章,这些都不能“理解”。

想象一下,你的孩子桌子上有一个玻璃盘子,他开始玩它。现在,你害怕它会破裂。所以,你给了他一个塑料盘子。这将是一个Mock(相同的行为,相同的接口,“更软的”实现)。

现在,假设你没有塑料替代品,所以你解释说“如果你继续玩它,它会碎的!”这是一个Stub,您预先提供了一个预定义的状态。

哑巴就是他根本不用的叉子…间谍可能是提供你已经使用过的有效解释。

我在阅读《单元测试的艺术》时,偶然发现了以下定义:

fake是一个通用术语,可以用来描述存根或模拟对象(手写或其他),因为它们看起来都像真实的对象。赝品是存根还是mock取决于它在当前测试中的使用方式。如果它用于检查交互(根据其断言),则它是一个模拟对象。否则,它就是存根。