我使用以下方法:

public class A<T> {

    protected Class<T> clazz;

    public A() {
        this.clazz = (Class<T>) ((ParameterizedType) getClass().getGenericSuperclass()).getActualTypeArguments()[0];
    }

    public Class<T> getClazz() {
        return clazz;
    }
}

public class B extends A<C> {
   /* ... */
    public void anything() {
       // here I may use getClazz();
    }
}

我不认为你可以，Java在编译时使用类型擦除，这样你的代码就可以与在泛型之前创建的应用程序和库兼容。

来自Oracle文档:

Type Erasure Generics were introduced to the Java language to provide tighter type checks at compile time and to support generic programming. To implement generics, the Java compiler applies type erasure to: Replace all type parameters in generic types with their bounds or Object if the type parameters are unbounded. The produced bytecode, therefore, contains only ordinary classes, interfaces, and methods. Insert type casts if necessary to preserve type safety. Generate bridge methods to preserve polymorphism in extended generic types. Type erasure ensures that no new classes are created for parameterized types; consequently, generics incur no runtime overhead.

http://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/java/generics/erasure.html

如果你有这样一个类:

public class GenericClass<T> {
    private T data;
}

T变量，那么你可以打印T名称:

System.out.println(data.getClass().getSimpleName()); // "String", "Integer", etc.

这里有一个方法，我用过一两次:

public abstract class GenericClass<T>{
    public abstract Class<T> getMyType();
}

随着

public class SpecificClass extends GenericClass<String>{

    @Override
    public Class<String> getMyType(){
        return String.class;
    }
}

如果你使用的是弹簧:

public static Class<?>[] resolveTypeArguments(Class<?> parentClass, Class<?> subClass) {
    if (subClass.isSynthetic()) {
        return null;
    }
    return GenericTypeResolver.resolveTypeArguments(subClass, parentClass);
}

顺便说一下，对于非子类类，GenericTypeResolver仍然会得到null，就像提到的问题一样，因为此类类的泛型信息在编译后被完全擦除。

解决这个问题的唯一方法可能是:

public class GenericClass<T>
{
    private final Class<T> clazz;
    public Foo(Class<T> clazz) {
        this.clazz= clazz;
    }
    
    public Type getMyType()
    {
        return clazz;
    }
}

你不能。如果向类中添加类型为T的成员变量(甚至不需要初始化它)，则可以使用它来恢复类型。