如果你有这样一个类:

public class GenericClass<T> {
    private T data;
}

T变量，那么你可以打印T名称:

System.out.println(data.getClass().getSimpleName()); // "String", "Integer", etc.

这里有一个方法，我用过一两次:

public abstract class GenericClass<T>{
    public abstract Class<T> getMyType();
}

随着

public class SpecificClass extends GenericClass<String>{

    @Override
    public Class<String> getMyType(){
        return String.class;
    }
}

如果你使用泛型类型存储变量，你可以很容易地解决这个问题，添加getClassType方法，如下所示:

public class Constant<T> {
  private T value;

  @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
  public Class<T> getClassType () {
    return ((Class<T>) value.getClass());
  }
}

我稍后使用提供的类对象来检查它是否是给定类的实例，如下所示:

Constant<?> constant = ...;
if (constant.getClassType().equals(Integer.class)) {
    Constant<Integer> integerConstant = (Constant<Integer>)constant;
    Integer value = integerConstant.getValue();
    // ...
}

为了完成这里的一些答案，我必须得到MyGenericClass的paramtrizedtype，不管层次结构有多高，在递归的帮助下:

private Class<T> getGenericTypeClass() {
        return (Class<T>) (getParametrizedType(getClass())).getActualTypeArguments()[0];
}

private static ParameterizedType getParametrizedType(Class clazz){
    if(clazz.getSuperclass().equals(MyGenericClass.class)){ // check that we are at the top of the hierarchy
        return (ParameterizedType) clazz.getGenericSuperclass();
    } else {
        return getParametrizedType(clazz.getSuperclass());
    }
}

我不认为你可以，Java在编译时使用类型擦除，这样你的代码就可以与在泛型之前创建的应用程序和库兼容。

来自Oracle文档:

Type Erasure Generics were introduced to the Java language to provide tighter type checks at compile time and to support generic programming. To implement generics, the Java compiler applies type erasure to: Replace all type parameters in generic types with their bounds or Object if the type parameters are unbounded. The produced bytecode, therefore, contains only ordinary classes, interfaces, and methods. Insert type casts if necessary to preserve type safety. Generate bridge methods to preserve polymorphism in extended generic types. Type erasure ensures that no new classes are created for parameterized types; consequently, generics incur no runtime overhead.

http://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/java/generics/erasure.html

我发现这是一个简单易懂且容易解释的解决方案

public class GenericClass<T> {

    private Class classForT(T...t) {
        return t.getClass().getComponentType();
    }

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        GenericClass<String> g = new GenericClass<String>();

        System.out.println(g.classForT());
        System.out.println(String.class);
    }
}