以下是我的诀窍:

public class Main {

    public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {

        System.out.println(Main.<String> getClazz());

    }

    static <T> Class getClazz(T... param) {

        return param.getClass().getComponentType();
    }

}

如果你使用泛型类型存储变量，你可以很容易地解决这个问题，添加getClassType方法，如下所示:

public class Constant<T> {
  private T value;

  @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
  public Class<T> getClassType () {
    return ((Class<T>) value.getClass());
  }
}

我稍后使用提供的类对象来检查它是否是给定类的实例，如下所示:

Constant<?> constant = ...;
if (constant.getClassType().equals(Integer.class)) {
    Constant<Integer> integerConstant = (Constant<Integer>)constant;
    Integer value = integerConstant.getValue();
    // ...
}

Java泛型大多是在编译时，这意味着类型信息在运行时丢失。

class GenericCls<T>
{
    T t;
}

会被编译成什么样子

class GenericCls
{
   Object o;
}

要在运行时获得类型信息，必须将其作为ctor的参数添加。

class GenericCls<T>
{
     private Class<T> type;
     public GenericCls(Class<T> cls)
     {
        type= cls;
     }
     Class<T> getType(){return type;}
}

例子:

GenericCls<?> instance = new GenericCls<String>(String.class);
assert instance.getType() == String.class;

我不认为你可以，Java在编译时使用类型擦除，这样你的代码就可以与在泛型之前创建的应用程序和库兼容。

来自Oracle文档:

Type Erasure Generics were introduced to the Java language to provide tighter type checks at compile time and to support generic programming. To implement generics, the Java compiler applies type erasure to: Replace all type parameters in generic types with their bounds or Object if the type parameters are unbounded. The produced bytecode, therefore, contains only ordinary classes, interfaces, and methods. Insert type casts if necessary to preserve type safety. Generate bridge methods to preserve polymorphism in extended generic types. Type erasure ensures that no new classes are created for parameterized types; consequently, generics incur no runtime overhead.

http://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/java/generics/erasure.html

如果不能更改泛型类并使用本页中已经解释的方法之一，那么简单的方法是根据运行时实例类名获取类型类。

Class getType(GenericType runtimeClassMember){
if (ClassA.class.equals(runtimeClassMember.getClass()){
  return TypeForClassA.class;
} else if (ClassB.class.equals(runtimeClassMember.getClass()){
  return TypeForClassB.class;
} 

//throw an expectation or do whatever you want for the cases not described in the if section.
}

如果你使用的是弹簧:

public static Class<?>[] resolveTypeArguments(Class<?> parentClass, Class<?> subClass) {
    if (subClass.isSynthetic()) {
        return null;
    }
    return GenericTypeResolver.resolveTypeArguments(subClass, parentClass);
}

顺便说一下，对于非子类类，GenericTypeResolver仍然会得到null，就像提到的问题一样，因为此类类的泛型信息在编译后被完全擦除。

解决这个问题的唯一方法可能是:

public class GenericClass<T>
{
    private final Class<T> clazz;
    public Foo(Class<T> clazz) {
        this.clazz= clazz;
    }
    
    public Type getMyType()
    {
        return clazz;
    }
}