我不认为你可以，Java在编译时使用类型擦除，这样你的代码就可以与在泛型之前创建的应用程序和库兼容。

来自Oracle文档:

Type Erasure Generics were introduced to the Java language to provide tighter type checks at compile time and to support generic programming. To implement generics, the Java compiler applies type erasure to: Replace all type parameters in generic types with their bounds or Object if the type parameters are unbounded. The produced bytecode, therefore, contains only ordinary classes, interfaces, and methods. Insert type casts if necessary to preserve type safety. Generate bridge methods to preserve polymorphism in extended generic types. Type erasure ensures that no new classes are created for parameterized types; consequently, generics incur no runtime overhead.

http://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/java/generics/erasure.html

这是我的解决方案

public class GenericClass<T>
{
    private Class<T> realType;

    public GenericClass() {
        findTypeArguments(getClass());
    }

    private void findTypeArguments(Type t) {
        if (t instanceof ParameterizedType) {
            Type[] typeArgs = ((ParameterizedType) t).getActualTypeArguments();
            realType = (Class<T>) typeArgs[0];
        } else {
            Class c = (Class) t;
            findTypeArguments(c.getGenericSuperclass());
        }
    }

    public Type getMyType()
    {
        // How do I return the type of T? (your question)
        return realType;
    }
}

不管你的类层次结构有多少层， 这个解决方案仍然有效，例如:

public class FirstLevelChild<T> extends GenericClass<T> {

}

public class SecondLevelChild extends FirstLevelChild<String> {

}

在本例中，getMyType() = java.lang.String

我不认为你可以，Java在编译时使用类型擦除，这样你的代码就可以与在泛型之前创建的应用程序和库兼容。

来自Oracle文档:

Type Erasure Generics were introduced to the Java language to provide tighter type checks at compile time and to support generic programming. To implement generics, the Java compiler applies type erasure to: Replace all type parameters in generic types with their bounds or Object if the type parameters are unbounded. The produced bytecode, therefore, contains only ordinary classes, interfaces, and methods. Insert type casts if necessary to preserve type safety. Generate bridge methods to preserve polymorphism in extended generic types. Type erasure ensures that no new classes are created for parameterized types; consequently, generics incur no runtime overhead.

http://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/java/generics/erasure.html

如果你使用泛型类型存储变量，你可以很容易地解决这个问题，添加getClassType方法，如下所示:

public class Constant<T> {
  private T value;

  @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
  public Class<T> getClassType () {
    return ((Class<T>) value.getClass());
  }
}

我稍后使用提供的类对象来检查它是否是给定类的实例，如下所示:

Constant<?> constant = ...;
if (constant.getClassType().equals(Integer.class)) {
    Constant<Integer> integerConstant = (Constant<Integer>)constant;
    Integer value = integerConstant.getValue();
    // ...
}

我做了相同的@Moesio上面，但在Kotlin可以这样做:

class A<T : SomeClass>() {

    var someClassType : T

    init(){
    this.someClassType = (javaClass.genericSuperclass as ParameterizedType).actualTypeArguments[0] as Class<T>
    }

}

我认为还有另一种优雅的解决方案。

你要做的是(安全地)将泛型类型参数的类型从concerete类“传递”给父类。

如果您允许自己将类类型视为类上的“元数据”，则建议使用Java方法在运行时编码元数据:注释。

首先按照下面的代码定义一个自定义注释:

import java.lang.annotation.*;

@Target(ElementType.TYPE)
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
public @interface EntityAnnotation {
    Class entityClass();
}

然后必须将注释添加到子类。

@EntityAnnotation(entityClass =  PassedGenericType.class)
public class Subclass<PassedGenericType> {...}

然后你可以使用下面的代码来获取基类中的类类型:

import org.springframework.core.annotation.AnnotationUtils;
.
.
.

private Class getGenericParameterType() {
    final Class aClass = this.getClass();
    EntityAnnotation ne = 
         AnnotationUtils.findAnnotation(aClass, EntityAnnotation.class);

    return ne.entityClass();
}

这种方法的一些局限性是:

在两个地方指定泛型类型(PassedGenericType)，而不是一个非dry类型。 只有当您可以修改具体的子类时，这才有可能。