我怎样才能做到这一点呢?
public class GenericClass<T>
{
public Type getMyType()
{
//How do I return the type of T?
}
}
到目前为止,我所尝试的一切总是返回Object类型,而不是使用的特定类型。
我怎样才能做到这一点呢?
public class GenericClass<T>
{
public Type getMyType()
{
//How do I return the type of T?
}
}
到目前为止,我所尝试的一切总是返回Object类型,而不是使用的特定类型。
当前回答
这是我的解决方案。例子可以解释。唯一的要求是子类必须设置泛型类型,而不是对象。
import java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject;
import java.lang.reflect.Field;
import java.lang.reflect.Method;
import java.lang.reflect.ParameterizedType;
import java.lang.reflect.Type;
import java.lang.reflect.TypeVariable;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.Map;
public class TypeUtils {
/*** EXAMPLES ***/
public static class Class1<A, B, C> {
public A someA;
public B someB;
public C someC;
public Class<?> getAType() {
return getTypeParameterType(this.getClass(), Class1.class, 0);
}
public Class<?> getCType() {
return getTypeParameterType(this.getClass(), Class1.class, 2);
}
}
public static class Class2<D, A, B, E, C> extends Class1<A, B, C> {
public B someB;
public D someD;
public E someE;
}
public static class Class3<E, C> extends Class2<String, Integer, Double, E, C> {
public E someE;
}
public static class Class4 extends Class3<Boolean, Long> {
}
public static void test() throws NoSuchFieldException {
Class4 class4 = new Class4();
Class<?> typeA = class4.getAType(); // typeA = Integer
Class<?> typeC = class4.getCType(); // typeC = Long
Field fieldSomeA = class4.getClass().getField("someA");
Class<?> typeSomeA = TypeUtils.getFieldType(class4.getClass(), fieldSomeA); // typeSomeA = Integer
Field fieldSomeE = class4.getClass().getField("someE");
Class<?> typeSomeE = TypeUtils.getFieldType(class4.getClass(), fieldSomeE); // typeSomeE = Boolean
}
/*** UTILS ***/
public static Class<?> getTypeVariableType(Class<?> subClass, TypeVariable<?> typeVariable) {
Map<TypeVariable<?>, Type> subMap = new HashMap<>();
Class<?> superClass;
while ((superClass = subClass.getSuperclass()) != null) {
Map<TypeVariable<?>, Type> superMap = new HashMap<>();
Type superGeneric = subClass.getGenericSuperclass();
if (superGeneric instanceof ParameterizedType) {
TypeVariable<?>[] typeParams = superClass.getTypeParameters();
Type[] actualTypeArgs = ((ParameterizedType) superGeneric).getActualTypeArguments();
for (int i = 0; i < typeParams.length; i++) {
Type actualType = actualTypeArgs[i];
if (actualType instanceof TypeVariable) {
actualType = subMap.get(actualType);
}
if (typeVariable == typeParams[i]) return (Class<?>) actualType;
superMap.put(typeParams[i], actualType);
}
}
subClass = superClass;
subMap = superMap;
}
return null;
}
public static Class<?> getTypeParameterType(Class<?> subClass, Class<?> superClass, int typeParameterIndex) {
return TypeUtils.getTypeVariableType(subClass, superClass.getTypeParameters()[typeParameterIndex]);
}
public static Class<?> getFieldType(Class<?> clazz, AccessibleObject element) {
Class<?> type = null;
Type genericType = null;
if (element instanceof Field) {
type = ((Field) element).getType();
genericType = ((Field) element).getGenericType();
} else if (element instanceof Method) {
type = ((Method) element).getReturnType();
genericType = ((Method) element).getGenericReturnType();
}
if (genericType instanceof TypeVariable) {
Class<?> typeVariableType = TypeUtils.getTypeVariableType(clazz, (TypeVariable) genericType);
if (typeVariableType != null) {
type = typeVariableType;
}
}
return type;
}
}
其他回答
使用番石榴。
import com.google.common.reflect.TypeToken;
import java.lang.reflect.Type;
public abstract class GenericClass<T> {
private final TypeToken<T> typeToken = new TypeToken<T>(getClass()) { };
private final Type type = typeToken.getType(); // or getRawType() to return Class<? super T>
public Type getType() {
return type;
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
GenericClass<String> example = new GenericClass<String>() { };
System.out.println(example.getType()); // => class java.lang.String
}
}
不久前,我在这里发布了一些完整的示例,包括抽象类和子类。
注意:这需要实例化GenericClass的一个子类,这样它才能正确地绑定类型参数。否则它只会返回类型为T。
如果你使用的是弹簧:
public static Class<?>[] resolveTypeArguments(Class<?> parentClass, Class<?> subClass) {
if (subClass.isSynthetic()) {
return null;
}
return GenericTypeResolver.resolveTypeArguments(subClass, parentClass);
}
顺便说一下,对于非子类类,GenericTypeResolver仍然会得到null,就像提到的问题一样,因为此类类的泛型信息在编译后被完全擦除。
解决这个问题的唯一方法可能是:
public class GenericClass<T>
{
private final Class<T> clazz;
public Foo(Class<T> clazz) {
this.clazz= clazz;
}
public Type getMyType()
{
return clazz;
}
}
我不认为你可以,Java在编译时使用类型擦除,这样你的代码就可以与在泛型之前创建的应用程序和库兼容。
来自Oracle文档:
Type Erasure Generics were introduced to the Java language to provide tighter type checks at compile time and to support generic programming. To implement generics, the Java compiler applies type erasure to: Replace all type parameters in generic types with their bounds or Object if the type parameters are unbounded. The produced bytecode, therefore, contains only ordinary classes, interfaces, and methods. Insert type casts if necessary to preserve type safety. Generate bridge methods to preserve polymorphism in extended generic types. Type erasure ensures that no new classes are created for parameterized types; consequently, generics incur no runtime overhead.
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/java/generics/erasure.html
这是我的解决方案:
import java.lang.reflect.Type;
import java.lang.reflect.TypeVariable;
public class GenericClass<T extends String> {
public static void main(String[] args) {
for (TypeVariable typeParam : GenericClass.class.getTypeParameters()) {
System.out.println(typeParam.getName());
for (Type bound : typeParam.getBounds()) {
System.out.println(bound);
}
}
}
}
当然,你可以。
出于向后兼容性的考虑,Java在运行时不使用这些信息。但是信息实际上是以元数据的形式呈现的,并且可以通过反射访问(但是它仍然不用于类型检查)。
来自官方API:
http://download.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/lang/reflect/ParameterizedType.html#getActualTypeArguments%28%29
但是,对于您的场景,我不会使用反射。我个人更倾向于将其用于框架代码。在你的例子中,我只是将类型作为构造函数参数添加。