这是我的解决方案:

import java.lang.reflect.Type;
import java.lang.reflect.TypeVariable;

public class GenericClass<T extends String> {

  public static void main(String[] args) {
     for (TypeVariable typeParam : GenericClass.class.getTypeParameters()) {
      System.out.println(typeParam.getName());
      for (Type bound : typeParam.getBounds()) {
         System.out.println(bound);
      }
    }
  }
}

为了完成这里的一些答案，我必须得到MyGenericClass的paramtrizedtype，不管层次结构有多高，在递归的帮助下:

private Class<T> getGenericTypeClass() {
        return (Class<T>) (getParametrizedType(getClass())).getActualTypeArguments()[0];
}

private static ParameterizedType getParametrizedType(Class clazz){
    if(clazz.getSuperclass().equals(MyGenericClass.class)){ // check that we are at the top of the hierarchy
        return (ParameterizedType) clazz.getGenericSuperclass();
    } else {
        return getParametrizedType(clazz.getSuperclass());
    }
}

它可能对某人有用。你可以使用java.lang.ref.WeakReference; 这种方式:

class SomeClass<N>{
  WeakReference<N> variableToGetTypeFrom;

  N getType(){
    return variableToGetTypeFrom.get();
  }
}

我不认为你可以，Java在编译时使用类型擦除，这样你的代码就可以与在泛型之前创建的应用程序和库兼容。

来自Oracle文档:

Type Erasure Generics were introduced to the Java language to provide tighter type checks at compile time and to support generic programming. To implement generics, the Java compiler applies type erasure to: Replace all type parameters in generic types with their bounds or Object if the type parameters are unbounded. The produced bytecode, therefore, contains only ordinary classes, interfaces, and methods. Insert type casts if necessary to preserve type safety. Generate bridge methods to preserve polymorphism in extended generic types. Type erasure ensures that no new classes are created for parameterized types; consequently, generics incur no runtime overhead.

http://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/java/generics/erasure.html

我使用以下方法:

public class A<T> {

    protected Class<T> clazz;

    public A() {
        this.clazz = (Class<T>) ((ParameterizedType) getClass().getGenericSuperclass()).getActualTypeArguments()[0];
    }

    public Class<T> getClazz() {
        return clazz;
    }
}

public class B extends A<C> {
   /* ... */
    public void anything() {
       // here I may use getClazz();
    }
}

如果你使用的是弹簧:

public static Class<?>[] resolveTypeArguments(Class<?> parentClass, Class<?> subClass) {
    if (subClass.isSynthetic()) {
        return null;
    }
    return GenericTypeResolver.resolveTypeArguments(subClass, parentClass);
}

顺便说一下，对于非子类类，GenericTypeResolver仍然会得到null，就像提到的问题一样，因为此类类的泛型信息在编译后被完全擦除。

解决这个问题的唯一方法可能是:

public class GenericClass<T>
{
    private final Class<T> clazz;
    public Foo(Class<T> clazz) {
        this.clazz= clazz;
    }
    
    public Type getMyType()
    {
        return clazz;
    }
}