我只是把这个放在一起，基于一些SQL响应这里在SO。

认为触发器之于数据库就像事件处理程序之于OOP是一种严重的反模式。有一种看法是，任何旧的逻辑都可以放入触发器中，当一个事务(事件)在表上发生时被触发。

不正确的。最大的区别之一是触发器是同步的——而且是完全同步的，因为它们在集合操作上是同步的，而不是在行操作上。在OOP方面，正好相反——事件是实现异步事务的有效方法。

重新使用一个“死”字段来做一些它不打算做的事情(例如在“传真”字段中存储用户数据)-尽管作为一个快速修复非常诱人!

我看到视图定义是这样的:

CREATE OR REPLACE FORCE VIEW PRICE (PART_NUMBER, PRICE_LIST, LIST_VERSION ...)
AS
  SELECT sp.MKT_PART_NUMBER,
    sp.PRICE_LIST,
    sp.LIST_VERSION,
    sp.MIN_PRICE,
    sp.UNIT_PRICE,
    sp.MAX_PRICE,
...

视图中大约有50个列。有些开发人员以不提供列别名而折磨他人为傲，因此必须计算两个位置的列偏移量，以便能够找出视图中对应的列。

使用SP作为存储过程名称的前缀，因为它将首先在系统过程位置中搜索，而不是自定义过程。

Human readable password fields, egad. Self explanatory. Using LIKE against indexed columns, and I'm almost tempted to just say LIKE in general. Recycling SQL-generated PK values. Surprise nobody mentioned the god-table yet. Nothing says "organic" like 100 columns of bit flags, large strings and integers. Then there's the "I miss .ini files" pattern: storing CSVs, pipe delimited strings or other parse required data in large text fields. And for MS SQL server the use of cursors at all. There's a better way to do any given cursor task.

编辑是因为有太多了!

我最不喜欢的是

Using spaces when creating tables, sprocs etc. I'm fine with CamelCase or under_scores and singular or plurals and UPPERCASE or lowercase but having to refer to a table or column [with spaces], especially if [ it is oddly spaced] (yes, I've run into this) really irritates me. Denormalized data. A table doesn't have to be perfectly normalized, but when I run into a table of employees that has information about their current evaluation score or their primary anything, it tells me that I will probably need to make a separate table at some point and then try to keep them synced. I will normalize the data first and then if I see a place where denormalization helps, I'll consider it. Overuse of either views or cursors. Views have a purpose, but when each table is wrapped in a view it's too much. I've had to use cursors a few times, but generally you can use other mechanisms for this. Access. Can a program be an anti-pattern? We have SQL Server at my work, but a number of people use access due to it's availabilty, "ease of use" and "friendliness" to non-technical users. There is too much here to go into, but if you've been in a similar environment, you know.