我更喜欢复制构造函数而不是克隆。意图更加明确。

好的，这篇文章中有一些明显的反射示例，但反射通常很慢，直到你开始正确缓存它。

如果你能正确缓存它，那么它将以4.6s的速度深度克隆1000000个对象（由Watcher测量）。

static readonly Dictionary<Type, PropertyInfo[]> ProperyList = new Dictionary<Type, PropertyInfo[]>();

而不是获取缓存的财产或将新属性添加到字典并简单使用它们

foreach (var prop in propList)
{
        var value = prop.GetValue(source, null);   
        prop.SetValue(copyInstance, value, null);
}

在另一个答案中查看我的帖子中的完整代码

https://stackoverflow.com/a/34365709/4711853

基于@craastad的答案，对于派生类。

在最初的答案中，如果调用者在基类对象上调用DeepCopy，则克隆的对象属于基类。但下面的代码将返回派生类。

using Newtonsoft.Json;

public static T DeepCopy<T>(this T source)
{
    return (T)JsonConvert.DeserializeObject(JsonConvert.SerializeObject(source), source.GetType());
}

我已经创建了一个可接受答案的版本，该版本同时适用于“[Serializable]”和“[DataContract]”。我写它已经有一段时间了，但如果我没有记错，[DataContract]需要一个不同的序列化程序。

需要System、System.IO、System.Runtime.Serialization、System.Runtime.Serialization.Formatters.Binary、System.Xml；

public static class ObjectCopier
{

    /// <summary>
    /// Perform a deep Copy of an object that is marked with '[Serializable]' or '[DataContract]'
    /// </summary>
    /// <typeparam name="T">The type of object being copied.</typeparam>
    /// <param name="source">The object instance to copy.</param>
    /// <returns>The copied object.</returns>
    public static T Clone<T>(T source)
    {
        if (typeof(T).IsSerializable == true)
        {
            return CloneUsingSerializable<T>(source);
        }

        if (IsDataContract(typeof(T)) == true)
        {
            return CloneUsingDataContracts<T>(source);
        }

        throw new ArgumentException("The type must be Serializable or use DataContracts.", "source");
    }


    /// <summary>
    /// Perform a deep Copy of an object that is marked with '[Serializable]'
    /// </summary>
    /// <remarks>
    /// Found on http://stackoverflow.com/questions/78536/cloning-objects-in-c-sharp
    /// Uses code found on CodeProject, which allows free use in third party apps
    /// - http://www.codeproject.com/KB/tips/SerializedObjectCloner.aspx
    /// </remarks>
    /// <typeparam name="T">The type of object being copied.</typeparam>
    /// <param name="source">The object instance to copy.</param>
    /// <returns>The copied object.</returns>
    public static T CloneUsingSerializable<T>(T source)
    {
        if (!typeof(T).IsSerializable)
        {
            throw new ArgumentException("The type must be serializable.", "source");
        }

        // Don't serialize a null object, simply return the default for that object
        if (Object.ReferenceEquals(source, null))
        {
            return default(T);
        }

        IFormatter formatter = new BinaryFormatter();
        Stream stream = new MemoryStream();
        using (stream)
        {
            formatter.Serialize(stream, source);
            stream.Seek(0, SeekOrigin.Begin);
            return (T)formatter.Deserialize(stream);
        }
    }


    /// <summary>
    /// Perform a deep Copy of an object that is marked with '[DataContract]'
    /// </summary>
    /// <typeparam name="T">The type of object being copied.</typeparam>
    /// <param name="source">The object instance to copy.</param>
    /// <returns>The copied object.</returns>
    public static T CloneUsingDataContracts<T>(T source)
    {
        if (IsDataContract(typeof(T)) == false)
        {
            throw new ArgumentException("The type must be a data contract.", "source");
        }

        // ** Don't serialize a null object, simply return the default for that object
        if (Object.ReferenceEquals(source, null))
        {
            return default(T);
        }

        DataContractSerializer dcs = new DataContractSerializer(typeof(T));
        using(Stream stream = new MemoryStream())
        {
            using (XmlDictionaryWriter writer = XmlDictionaryWriter.CreateBinaryWriter(stream))
            {
                dcs.WriteObject(writer, source);
                writer.Flush();
                stream.Seek(0, SeekOrigin.Begin);
                using (XmlDictionaryReader reader = XmlDictionaryReader.CreateBinaryReader(stream, XmlDictionaryReaderQuotas.Max))
                {
                    return (T)dcs.ReadObject(reader);
                }
            }
        }
    }


    /// <summary>
    /// Helper function to check if a class is a [DataContract]
    /// </summary>
    /// <param name="type">The type of the object to check.</param>
    /// <returns>Boolean flag indicating if the class is a DataContract (true) or not (false) </returns>
    public static bool IsDataContract(Type type)
    {
        object[] attributes = type.GetCustomAttributes(typeof(DataContractAttribute), false);
        return attributes.Length == 1;
    }

} 

C#9.0引入了需要记录的with关键字（谢谢Mark Nading）。这应该允许非常简单的对象克隆（如果需要，还可以进行突变），只需要很少的样板，但只需要一个记录。

您似乎无法通过将类放入通用记录来克隆（按值）类；

using System;
                
public class Program
{
    public class Example
    {
        public string A { get; set; }
    }
    
    public record ClonerRecord<T>(T a)
    {
    }

    public static void Main()
    {
        var foo = new Example {A = "Hello World"};
        var bar = (new ClonerRecord<Example>(foo) with {}).a;
        foo.A = "Goodbye World :(";
        Console.WriteLine(bar.A);
    }
}

这写着“再见世界：（）”-字符串是通过引用复制的（不需要）。https://dotnetfiddle.net/w3IJgG

（令人难以置信的是，上面的方法可以正确地用于结构！https://dotnetfiddle.net/469NJv)

但克隆一条记录似乎确实可以按值进行缩进和克隆。

using System;

public class Program
{
    public record Example
    {
        public string A { get; set; }
    }
    
    public static void Main()
    {
        var foo = new Example {A = "Hello World"};
        var bar = foo with {};
        foo.A = "Goodbye World :(";
        Console.WriteLine(bar.A);
    }
}

这将返回“Hello World”，字符串是按值复制的！https://dotnetfiddle.net/MCHGEL

更多信息可以在博客文章中找到：

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/language-reference/operators/with-expression

我提出这一点是为了克服.NET的一个缺点，即必须手动深度复制List<T>。

我使用这个：

static public IEnumerable<SpotPlacement> CloneList(List<SpotPlacement> spotPlacements)
{
    foreach (SpotPlacement sp in spotPlacements)
    {
        yield return (SpotPlacement)sp.Clone();
    }
}

在另一个地方：

public object Clone()
{
    OrderItem newOrderItem = new OrderItem();
    ...
    newOrderItem._exactPlacements.AddRange(SpotPlacement.CloneList(_exactPlacements));
    ...
    return newOrderItem;
}

我试图提出一个这样做的oneliner，但这是不可能的，因为yield不能在匿名方法块中工作。

更好的是，使用通用的List<T>克隆器：

class Utility<T> where T : ICloneable
{
    static public IEnumerable<T> CloneList(List<T> tl)
    {
        foreach (T t in tl)
        {
            yield return (T)t.Clone();
        }
    }
}