我想做一些事情,比如:
MyObject myObj = GetMyObj(); // Create and fill a new object
MyObject newObj = myObj.Clone();
然后对未反映在原始对象中的新对象进行更改。
我通常不需要这个功能,所以当有必要时,我会创建一个新对象,然后单独复制每个属性,但这总是让我觉得有更好或更优雅的方法来处理这种情况。
如何克隆或深度复制对象,以便在原始对象中不反映任何更改的情况下修改克隆的对象?
我想做一些事情,比如:
MyObject myObj = GetMyObj(); // Create and fill a new object
MyObject newObj = myObj.Clone();
然后对未反映在原始对象中的新对象进行更改。
我通常不需要这个功能,所以当有必要时,我会创建一个新对象,然后单独复制每个属性,但这总是让我觉得有更好或更优雅的方法来处理这种情况。
如何克隆或深度复制对象,以便在原始对象中不反映任何更改的情况下修改克隆的对象?
当前回答
基于@craastad的答案,对于派生类。
在最初的答案中,如果调用者在基类对象上调用DeepCopy,则克隆的对象属于基类。但下面的代码将返回派生类。
using Newtonsoft.Json;
public static T DeepCopy<T>(this T source)
{
return (T)JsonConvert.DeserializeObject(JsonConvert.SerializeObject(source), source.GetType());
}
其他回答
创建扩展:
public static T Clone<T>(this T theObject)
{
string jsonData = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(theObject);
return JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<T>(jsonData);
}
这样称呼:
NewObject = OldObject.Clone();
最短的方式,但需要依赖:
using Newtonsoft.Json;
public static T Clone<T>(T source) =>
JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<T>(JsonConvert.SerializeObject(source));
下面是一个深度拷贝实现:
public static object CloneObject(object opSource)
{
//grab the type and create a new instance of that type
Type opSourceType = opSource.GetType();
object opTarget = CreateInstanceOfType(opSourceType);
//grab the properties
PropertyInfo[] opPropertyInfo = opSourceType.GetProperties(BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.NonPublic | BindingFlags.Instance);
//iterate over the properties and if it has a 'set' method assign it from the source TO the target
foreach (PropertyInfo item in opPropertyInfo)
{
if (item.CanWrite)
{
//value types can simply be 'set'
if (item.PropertyType.IsValueType || item.PropertyType.IsEnum || item.PropertyType.Equals(typeof(System.String)))
{
item.SetValue(opTarget, item.GetValue(opSource, null), null);
}
//object/complex types need to recursively call this method until the end of the tree is reached
else
{
object opPropertyValue = item.GetValue(opSource, null);
if (opPropertyValue == null)
{
item.SetValue(opTarget, null, null);
}
else
{
item.SetValue(opTarget, CloneObject(opPropertyValue), null);
}
}
}
}
//return the new item
return opTarget;
}
我已经创建了一个可接受答案的版本,该版本同时适用于“[Serializable]”和“[DataContract]”。我写它已经有一段时间了,但如果我没有记错,[DataContract]需要一个不同的序列化程序。
需要System、System.IO、System.Runtime.Serialization、System.Runtime.Serialization.Formatters.Binary、System.Xml;
public static class ObjectCopier
{
/// <summary>
/// Perform a deep Copy of an object that is marked with '[Serializable]' or '[DataContract]'
/// </summary>
/// <typeparam name="T">The type of object being copied.</typeparam>
/// <param name="source">The object instance to copy.</param>
/// <returns>The copied object.</returns>
public static T Clone<T>(T source)
{
if (typeof(T).IsSerializable == true)
{
return CloneUsingSerializable<T>(source);
}
if (IsDataContract(typeof(T)) == true)
{
return CloneUsingDataContracts<T>(source);
}
throw new ArgumentException("The type must be Serializable or use DataContracts.", "source");
}
/// <summary>
/// Perform a deep Copy of an object that is marked with '[Serializable]'
/// </summary>
/// <remarks>
/// Found on http://stackoverflow.com/questions/78536/cloning-objects-in-c-sharp
/// Uses code found on CodeProject, which allows free use in third party apps
/// - http://www.codeproject.com/KB/tips/SerializedObjectCloner.aspx
/// </remarks>
/// <typeparam name="T">The type of object being copied.</typeparam>
/// <param name="source">The object instance to copy.</param>
/// <returns>The copied object.</returns>
public static T CloneUsingSerializable<T>(T source)
{
if (!typeof(T).IsSerializable)
{
throw new ArgumentException("The type must be serializable.", "source");
}
// Don't serialize a null object, simply return the default for that object
if (Object.ReferenceEquals(source, null))
{
return default(T);
}
IFormatter formatter = new BinaryFormatter();
Stream stream = new MemoryStream();
using (stream)
{
formatter.Serialize(stream, source);
stream.Seek(0, SeekOrigin.Begin);
return (T)formatter.Deserialize(stream);
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Perform a deep Copy of an object that is marked with '[DataContract]'
/// </summary>
/// <typeparam name="T">The type of object being copied.</typeparam>
/// <param name="source">The object instance to copy.</param>
/// <returns>The copied object.</returns>
public static T CloneUsingDataContracts<T>(T source)
{
if (IsDataContract(typeof(T)) == false)
{
throw new ArgumentException("The type must be a data contract.", "source");
}
// ** Don't serialize a null object, simply return the default for that object
if (Object.ReferenceEquals(source, null))
{
return default(T);
}
DataContractSerializer dcs = new DataContractSerializer(typeof(T));
using(Stream stream = new MemoryStream())
{
using (XmlDictionaryWriter writer = XmlDictionaryWriter.CreateBinaryWriter(stream))
{
dcs.WriteObject(writer, source);
writer.Flush();
stream.Seek(0, SeekOrigin.Begin);
using (XmlDictionaryReader reader = XmlDictionaryReader.CreateBinaryReader(stream, XmlDictionaryReaderQuotas.Max))
{
return (T)dcs.ReadObject(reader);
}
}
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Helper function to check if a class is a [DataContract]
/// </summary>
/// <param name="type">The type of the object to check.</param>
/// <returns>Boolean flag indicating if the class is a DataContract (true) or not (false) </returns>
public static bool IsDataContract(Type type)
{
object[] attributes = type.GetCustomAttributes(typeof(DataContractAttribute), false);
return attributes.Length == 1;
}
}
问:我为什么选择这个答案?
如果您想要.NET所能达到的最快速度,请选择此答案。如果您想要一种非常简单的克隆方法,请忽略这个答案。
换言之,除非您有需要解决的性能瓶颈,并且您可以使用分析器来证明这一点,否则请使用另一个答案。
比其他方法快10倍
执行深度克隆的以下方法是:
比任何涉及序列化/反序列化的速度快10倍;非常接近.NET所能达到的理论最大速度。
方法。。。
为了达到最高速度,可以使用Nested MemberwiseClone进行深度复制。它与复制值结构的速度几乎相同,并且比(a)反射或(b)序列化(如本页其他答案所述)快得多。
请注意,如果使用Nested MemberwiseColone进行深度复制,则必须为类中的每个嵌套级别手动实现ShallowCopy,以及调用所有所述ShallowCopy方法以创建完整克隆的DeepCopy。这很简单:总共只有几行,请参见下面的演示代码。
下面是显示100000个克隆的相对性能差异的代码输出:
嵌套结构上的嵌套MemberwiseClone为1.08秒嵌套类上的嵌套MemberwiseClone为4.77秒39.93秒用于序列化/反序列化
在类上使用Nested MemberwiseColone几乎与复制结构一样快,而且复制结构的速度非常接近.NET所能达到的理论最大速度。
Demo 1 of shallow and deep copy, using classes and MemberwiseClone:
Create Bob
Bob.Age=30, Bob.Purchase.Description=Lamborghini
Clone Bob >> BobsSon
Adjust BobsSon details
BobsSon.Age=2, BobsSon.Purchase.Description=Toy car
Proof of deep copy: If BobsSon is a true clone, then adjusting BobsSon details will not affect Bob:
Bob.Age=30, Bob.Purchase.Description=Lamborghini
Elapsed time: 00:00:04.7795670,30000000
Demo 2 of shallow and deep copy, using structs and value copying:
Create Bob
Bob.Age=30, Bob.Purchase.Description=Lamborghini
Clone Bob >> BobsSon
Adjust BobsSon details:
BobsSon.Age=2, BobsSon.Purchase.Description=Toy car
Proof of deep copy: If BobsSon is a true clone, then adjusting BobsSon details will not affect Bob:
Bob.Age=30, Bob.Purchase.Description=Lamborghini
Elapsed time: 00:00:01.0875454,30000000
Demo 3 of deep copy, using class and serialize/deserialize:
Elapsed time: 00:00:39.9339425,30000000
为了了解如何使用MemberwiseCopy进行深度复制,这里是用于生成上述时间的演示项目:
// Nested MemberwiseClone example.
// Added to demo how to deep copy a reference class.
[Serializable] // Not required if using MemberwiseClone, only used for speed comparison using serialization.
public class Person
{
public Person(int age, string description)
{
this.Age = age;
this.Purchase.Description = description;
}
[Serializable] // Not required if using MemberwiseClone
public class PurchaseType
{
public string Description;
public PurchaseType ShallowCopy()
{
return (PurchaseType)this.MemberwiseClone();
}
}
public PurchaseType Purchase = new PurchaseType();
public int Age;
// Add this if using nested MemberwiseClone.
// This is a class, which is a reference type, so cloning is more difficult.
public Person ShallowCopy()
{
return (Person)this.MemberwiseClone();
}
// Add this if using nested MemberwiseClone.
// This is a class, which is a reference type, so cloning is more difficult.
public Person DeepCopy()
{
// Clone the root ...
Person other = (Person) this.MemberwiseClone();
// ... then clone the nested class.
other.Purchase = this.Purchase.ShallowCopy();
return other;
}
}
// Added to demo how to copy a value struct (this is easy - a deep copy happens by default)
public struct PersonStruct
{
public PersonStruct(int age, string description)
{
this.Age = age;
this.Purchase.Description = description;
}
public struct PurchaseType
{
public string Description;
}
public PurchaseType Purchase;
public int Age;
// This is a struct, which is a value type, so everything is a clone by default.
public PersonStruct ShallowCopy()
{
return (PersonStruct)this;
}
// This is a struct, which is a value type, so everything is a clone by default.
public PersonStruct DeepCopy()
{
return (PersonStruct)this;
}
}
// Added only for a speed comparison.
public class MyDeepCopy
{
public static T DeepCopy<T>(T obj)
{
object result = null;
using (var ms = new MemoryStream())
{
var formatter = new BinaryFormatter();
formatter.Serialize(ms, obj);
ms.Position = 0;
result = (T)formatter.Deserialize(ms);
ms.Close();
}
return (T)result;
}
}
然后,从main调用演示:
void MyMain(string[] args)
{
{
Console.Write("Demo 1 of shallow and deep copy, using classes and MemberwiseCopy:\n");
var Bob = new Person(30, "Lamborghini");
Console.Write(" Create Bob\n");
Console.Write(" Bob.Age={0}, Bob.Purchase.Description={1}\n", Bob.Age, Bob.Purchase.Description);
Console.Write(" Clone Bob >> BobsSon\n");
var BobsSon = Bob.DeepCopy();
Console.Write(" Adjust BobsSon details\n");
BobsSon.Age = 2;
BobsSon.Purchase.Description = "Toy car";
Console.Write(" BobsSon.Age={0}, BobsSon.Purchase.Description={1}\n", BobsSon.Age, BobsSon.Purchase.Description);
Console.Write(" Proof of deep copy: If BobsSon is a true clone, then adjusting BobsSon details will not affect Bob:\n");
Console.Write(" Bob.Age={0}, Bob.Purchase.Description={1}\n", Bob.Age, Bob.Purchase.Description);
Debug.Assert(Bob.Age == 30);
Debug.Assert(Bob.Purchase.Description == "Lamborghini");
var sw = new Stopwatch();
sw.Start();
int total = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < 100000; i++)
{
var n = Bob.DeepCopy();
total += n.Age;
}
Console.Write(" Elapsed time: {0},{1}\n\n", sw.Elapsed, total);
}
{
Console.Write("Demo 2 of shallow and deep copy, using structs:\n");
var Bob = new PersonStruct(30, "Lamborghini");
Console.Write(" Create Bob\n");
Console.Write(" Bob.Age={0}, Bob.Purchase.Description={1}\n", Bob.Age, Bob.Purchase.Description);
Console.Write(" Clone Bob >> BobsSon\n");
var BobsSon = Bob.DeepCopy();
Console.Write(" Adjust BobsSon details:\n");
BobsSon.Age = 2;
BobsSon.Purchase.Description = "Toy car";
Console.Write(" BobsSon.Age={0}, BobsSon.Purchase.Description={1}\n", BobsSon.Age, BobsSon.Purchase.Description);
Console.Write(" Proof of deep copy: If BobsSon is a true clone, then adjusting BobsSon details will not affect Bob:\n");
Console.Write(" Bob.Age={0}, Bob.Purchase.Description={1}\n", Bob.Age, Bob.Purchase.Description);
Debug.Assert(Bob.Age == 30);
Debug.Assert(Bob.Purchase.Description == "Lamborghini");
var sw = new Stopwatch();
sw.Start();
int total = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < 100000; i++)
{
var n = Bob.DeepCopy();
total += n.Age;
}
Console.Write(" Elapsed time: {0},{1}\n\n", sw.Elapsed, total);
}
{
Console.Write("Demo 3 of deep copy, using class and serialize/deserialize:\n");
int total = 0;
var sw = new Stopwatch();
sw.Start();
var Bob = new Person(30, "Lamborghini");
for (int i = 0; i < 100000; i++)
{
var BobsSon = MyDeepCopy.DeepCopy<Person>(Bob);
total += BobsSon.Age;
}
Console.Write(" Elapsed time: {0},{1}\n", sw.Elapsed, total);
}
Console.ReadKey();
}
再次注意,如果您使用Nested MemberwiseColone进行深度复制,则必须为类中的每个嵌套级别手动实现ShallowCopy,以及调用所有所述ShallowCopy方法以创建完整克隆的DeepCopy。这很简单:总共只有几行,请参见上面的演示代码。
值类型与引用类型
请注意,在克隆对象时,“结构”和“类”之间有很大的区别:
如果您有一个“struct”,它是一个值类型,因此您可以复制它,内容将被克隆(但除非您使用本文中的技术,否则它只能进行浅层克隆)。如果你有一个“类”,它是一个引用类型,所以如果你复制它,你所做的就是复制指向它的指针。要创建一个真正的克隆,你必须更具创造力,利用值类型和引用类型之间的差异,从而在内存中创建原始对象的另一个副本。
请参见值类型和引用类型之间的差异。
帮助调试的校验和
错误地克隆对象会导致很难确定错误。在生产代码中,我倾向于实现一个校验和,以双重检查对象是否已正确克隆,并且没有被另一个引用损坏。此校验和可以在发布模式下关闭。我发现这个方法非常有用:通常,您只想克隆对象的一部分,而不是整个对象。
对于将许多线程与许多其他线程分离非常有用
该代码的一个优秀用例是将嵌套类或结构的克隆送入队列,以实现生产者/消费者模式。
我们可以让一个(或多个)线程修改自己拥有的类,然后将该类的完整副本推送到并发队列中。然后,我们有一个(或多个)线程将这些类的副本拉出并处理它们。
这在实践中非常有效,并允许我们将许多线程(生产者)与一个或多个线程(消费者)分离。
而且这种方法也非常快:如果我们使用嵌套结构,它比序列化/反序列化嵌套类快35倍,并且允许我们利用机器上所有可用的线程。
使现代化
显然,ExpressMapper与上面的手工编码一样快,甚至更快。我可能需要看看它们与探查器的比较。