ruby方式:.transpose。地图&:反向

虽然旋转数据可能是必要的(也许是为了更新物理存储的表示)，但在数组访问上添加一层间接层(也许是一个接口)会变得更简单，可能更性能:

interface IReadableMatrix
{
    int GetValue(int x, int y);
}

如果你的矩阵已经实现了这个接口，那么它可以通过这样一个装饰器类来旋转:

class RotatedMatrix : IReadableMatrix
{
    private readonly IReadableMatrix _baseMatrix;

    public RotatedMatrix(IReadableMatrix baseMatrix)
    {
        _baseMatrix = baseMatrix;
    }

    int GetValue(int x, int y)
    {
        // transpose x and y dimensions
        return _baseMatrix(y, x);
    }
}

旋转+90/-90/180度，水平/垂直翻转和缩放都可以以这种方式实现。

Performance would need to be measured in your specific scenario. However the O(n^2) operation has now been replaced with an O(1) call. It's a virtual method call which is slower than direct array access, so it depends upon how frequently the rotated array is used after rotation. If it's used once, then this approach would definitely win. If it's rotated then used in a long-running system for days, then in-place rotation might perform better. It also depends whether you can accept the up-front cost.

与所有性能问题一样，测量，测量，测量!

下面是一个c#静态泛型方法，它可以为您完成这项工作。变量的名称很好，所以您可以很容易地理解算法的思想。

private static T[,] Rotate180 <T> (T[,] matrix)
{
    var height = matrix.GetLength (0);
    var width = matrix.GetLength (1);
    var answer = new T[height, width];

    for (int y = 0; y < height / 2; y++)
    {
        int topY = y;
        int bottomY = height - 1 - y;
        for (int topX = 0; topX < width; topX++)
        {
            var bottomX = width - topX - 1;
            answer[topY, topX] = matrix[bottomY, bottomX];
            answer[bottomY, bottomX] = matrix[topY, topX];
        }
    }

    if (height % 2 == 0)
        return answer;

    var centerY = height / 2;
    for (int leftX = 0; leftX < Mathf.CeilToInt(width / 2f); leftX++)
    {
        var rightX = width - 1 - leftX;
        answer[centerY, leftX] = matrix[centerY, rightX];
        answer[centerY, rightX] = matrix[centerY, leftX];
    }

    return answer;
}

这是c#的

int[,] array = new int[4,4] {
    { 1,2,3,4 },
    { 5,6,7,8 },
    { 9,0,1,2 },
    { 3,4,5,6 }
};

int[,] rotated = RotateMatrix(array, 4);

static int[,] RotateMatrix(int[,] matrix, int n) {
    int[,] ret = new int[n, n];

    for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
        for (int j = 0; j < n; ++j) {
            ret[i, j] = matrix[n - j - 1, i];
        }
    }

    return ret;
}

PHP:

<?php    
$a = array(array(1,2,3,4),array(5,6,7,8),array(9,0,1,2),array(3,4,5,6));
$b = array(); //result

while(count($a)>0)
{
    $b[count($a[0])-1][] = array_shift($a[0]);
    if (count($a[0])==0)
    {
         array_shift($a);
    }
}

从PHP5.6开始，数组转位可以通过一个狡猾的array_map()调用来执行。换句话说，列被转换为行。

代码:(演示)

$array = [
    [1, 2, 3, 4],
    [5, 6, 7, 8],
    [9, 0, 1, 2],
    [3, 4, 5, 6]
];
$transposed = array_map(null, ...$array);

美元转置:

[
    [1, 5, 9, 3],
    [2, 6, 0, 4],
    [3, 7, 1, 5],
    [4, 8, 2, 6]
]

当前所有的解决方案都有O(n^2)开销作为临时空间(这不包括那些肮脏的OOP骗子!)这里有一个内存占用为O(1)的解决方案，将矩阵原地右转90度。该死的延展性，这玩意儿跑得很快!

#include <algorithm>
#include <cstddef>

// Rotates an NxN matrix of type T 90 degrees to the right.
template <typename T, size_t N>
void rotate_matrix(T (&matrix)[N][N])
{
    for(size_t i = 0; i < N; ++i)
        for(size_t j = 0; j <= (N-i); ++j)
            std::swap(matrix[i][j], matrix[j][i]);
}

免责声明:我实际上并没有测试这个。让我们玩打虫游戏吧!