静态方法不像实例方法那样是虚拟的，所以我猜想Java设计者决定不让它们出现在接口中。

但是您可以将包含静态方法的类放在接口中。你可以试试!

public interface Test {
    static class Inner {
        public static Object get() {
            return 0;
        }
    }
}

注释编辑:从Java 8开始，静态方法现在被允许出现在接口中。

这是正确的，静态方法自Java 8以来就被允许在接口中，但您的示例仍然不能工作。你不能只是定义一个静态方法:你必须实现它，否则你会得到一个编译错误。

一个接口永远不能被静态地解引用，例如issomething .member。接口总是通过引用该接口子类实例的变量来解除引用。因此，如果没有其子类的实例，接口引用永远不可能知道它引用的是哪个子类。

Thus the closest approximation to a static method in an interface would be a non-static method that ignores "this", i.e. does not access any non-static members of the instance. At the low-level abstraction, every non-static method (after lookup in any vtable) is really just a function with class scope that takes "this" as an implicit formal parameter. See Scala's singleton object and interoperability with Java as evidence of that concept. And thus every static method is a function with class scope that does not take a "this" parameter. Thus normally a static method can be called statically, but as previously stated, an interface has no implementation (is abstract).

Thus to get closest approximation to a static method in an interface, is to use a non-static method, then don't access any of the non-static instance members. There would be no possible performance benefit any other way, because there is no way to statically link (at compile-time) a ISomething.member(). The only benefit I see of a static method in an interface is that it would not input (i.e. ignore) an implicit "this" and thus disallow access to any of the non-static instance members. This would declare implicitly that the function that doesn't access "this", is immutate and not even readonly with respect to its containing class. But a declaration of "static" in an interface ISomething would also confuse people who tried to access it with ISomething.member() which would cause a compiler error. I suppose if the compiler error was sufficiently explanatory, it would be better than trying to educate people about using a non-static method to accomplish what they want (apparently mostly factory methods), as we are doing here (and has been repeated for 3 Q&A times on this site), so it is obviously an issue that is not intuitive for many people. I had to think about it for a while to get the correct understanding.

在接口中获取可变静态字段的方法是在接口中使用非静态getter和setter方法，来访问子类中的静态字段。旁注，显然不可变静态可以在带有静态final的Java接口中声明。

如果没有泛型，静态接口是无用的，因为所有静态方法调用都是在编译时解析的。所以，它们没有真正的用处。

对于泛型，它们可以使用——无论是否使用默认实现。显然需要重写等等。然而，我的猜测是，这样的用法不是很面向对象(正如其他答案迟钝地指出的那样)，因此被认为不值得付出努力来有效地实现它们。

不能在接口中定义静态方法，因为静态方法属于类而不是类的实例，而接口不是类。点击这里阅读更多。

然而，如果你愿意，你可以这样做:

public class A {
  public static void methodX() {
  }
}

public class B extends A {
  public static void methodX() {
  }
}

在这种情况下，你有两个类，两个不同的静态方法称为methodX()。

静态方法不像实例方法那样是虚拟的，所以我猜想Java设计者决定不让它们出现在接口中。

但是您可以将包含静态方法的类放在接口中。你可以试试!

public interface Test {
    static class Inner {
        public static Object get() {
            return 0;
        }
    }
}