那么，你认为

int main(void) {
    printf(" 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8");
    return 0;
}

我打赌1000是二进制的 他显然是在检查这家伙的CQ (compSci商数)

只需使用std::copy()和一个特殊的迭代器。

#include <algorithm>
#include <iostream>
#include <iterator>

struct number_iterator
{
    typedef std::input_iterator_tag iterator_category;
    typedef int                     value_type;
    typedef std::size_t             difference_type;
    typedef int*                    pointer;
    typedef int&                    reference;

    number_iterator(int v): value(v)                {}
    bool operator != (number_iterator const& rhs)   { return value != rhs.value;}
    number_iterator operator++()                    { ++value; return *this;}
    int operator*()                                 { return value; }
    int value;
};



int main()
{
    std::copy(number_iterator(1), 
              number_iterator(1001), 
              std::ostream_iterator<int>(std::cout, " "));
}

看起来它不需要使用循环

printf("1 10 11 100 101 110 111 1000\n");

使用系统命令:

system("/usr/bin/seq 1000");

令人惊讶的是，如果你放弃了“必须是C或c++”的要求，事情会变得多么简单:

Unix shell:

echo {1..1000} | tr ' ' '\n'

or

yes | nl | awk '{print $1}' | head -1000

如果你在一个没有yes命令的Unix变体上运行，使用其他进程至少生成1000行:

find / 2> /dev/null | nl | awk '{print $1}' | head -1000

or

cat /dev/zero | uuencode - | nl | awk '{print $1}' | head -1000

or

head -1000 /etc/termcap | nl -s: | cut -d: -f1

如果POSIX解决方案被接受:

#include <stdio.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <sys/time.h>
#include <pthread.h>

static void die(int sig) {
    exit(0);
}

static void wakeup(int sig) {
    static int counter = 1;
    struct itimerval timer;
    float i = 1000 / (1000 - counter);

    printf("%d\n", counter++);

    timer.it_interval.tv_sec = 0;
    timer.it_interval.tv_usec = 0;
    timer.it_value.tv_sec = 0;
    timer.it_value.tv_usec = i; /* Avoid code elimination */
    setitimer(ITIMER_REAL, &timer, 0);
}

int main() {
    pthread_mutex_t mutex = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
    signal(SIGFPE, die);
    signal(SIGALRM, wakeup);
    wakeup(0);
    pthread_mutex_lock(&mutex);
    pthread_mutex_lock(&mutex); /* Deadlock, YAY! */
    return 0;
}