我发现它更方便访问字典键作为obj。foo而不是obj['foo'],所以我写了这个片段:

class AttributeDict(dict):
    def __getattr__(self, attr):
        return self[attr]
    def __setattr__(self, attr, value):
        self[attr] = value

然而,我认为一定有一些原因,Python没有提供开箱即用的功能。以这种方式访问字典键的注意事项和缺陷是什么?


当前回答

我根据这个线程的输入创建了这个。我需要使用odect,所以我必须覆盖get和设置attr。我认为这应该适用于大多数特殊用途。

用法如下:

# Create an ordered dict normally...
>>> od = OrderedAttrDict()
>>> od["a"] = 1
>>> od["b"] = 2
>>> od
OrderedAttrDict([('a', 1), ('b', 2)])

# Get and set data using attribute access...
>>> od.a
1
>>> od.b = 20
>>> od
OrderedAttrDict([('a', 1), ('b', 20)])

# Setting a NEW attribute only creates it on the instance, not the dict...
>>> od.c = 8
>>> od
OrderedAttrDict([('a', 1), ('b', 20)])
>>> od.c
8

类:

class OrderedAttrDict(odict.OrderedDict):
    """
    Constructs an odict.OrderedDict with attribute access to data.

    Setting a NEW attribute only creates it on the instance, not the dict.
    Setting an attribute that is a key in the data will set the dict data but 
    will not create a new instance attribute
    """
    def __getattr__(self, attr):
        """
        Try to get the data. If attr is not a key, fall-back and get the attr
        """
        if self.has_key(attr):
            return super(OrderedAttrDict, self).__getitem__(attr)
        else:
            return super(OrderedAttrDict, self).__getattr__(attr)


    def __setattr__(self, attr, value):
        """
        Try to set the data. If attr is not a key, fall-back and set the attr
        """
        if self.has_key(attr):
            super(OrderedAttrDict, self).__setitem__(attr, value)
        else:
            super(OrderedAttrDict, self).__setattr__(attr, value)

这是一个非常酷的模式,已经在线程中提到了,但如果你只是想把字典转换成一个在IDE中使用自动完成的对象,等等:

class ObjectFromDict(object):
    def __init__(self, d):
        self.__dict__ = d

其他回答

使用SimpleNamespace:

from types import SimpleNamespace

obj = SimpleNamespace(color="blue", year=2050)

print(obj.color) #> "blue"
print(obj.year) #> 2050

编辑/更新:对OP的问题的更近的答案,从字典开始:

from types import SimpleNamespace

params = {"color":"blue", "year":2020}

obj = SimpleNamespace(**params)

print(obj.color) #> "blue"
print(obj.year) #> 2050

没有必要自己写 Setattr()和getattr()已经存在。

类对象的优势可能在类定义和继承中发挥作用。

这个答案摘自Luciano Ramalho的《流利的Python》一书。这要归功于那个家伙。

class AttrDict:
    """A read-only façade for navigating a JSON-like object
    using attribute notation
    """

    def __init__(self, mapping):
        self._data = dict(mapping)

    def __getattr__(self, name):
        if hasattr(self._data, name):
            return getattr(self._data, name)
        else:
            return AttrDict.build(self._data[name])

    @classmethod
    def build(cls, obj):
        if isinstance(obj, Mapping):
            return cls(obj)
        elif isinstance(obj, MutableSequence):
            return [cls.build(item) for item in obj]
        else:
            return obj

in the init we are taking the dict and making it a dictionary. when getattr is used we try to get the attribute from the dict if the dict already has that attribute. or else we are passing the argument to a class method called build. now build does the intresting thing. if the object is dict or a mapping like that, the that object is made an attr dict itself. if it's a sequence like list, it's passed to the build function we r on right now. if it's anythin else, like str or int. return the object itself.

显然,现在有一个库- https://pypi.python.org/pypi/attrdict -实现了这个确切的功能,加上递归合并和json加载。也许值得一看。

从另一个SO问题中,有一个很好的实现示例,可以简化现有的代码。如何:

class AttributeDict(dict):
    __slots__ = () 
    __getattr__ = dict.__getitem__
    __setattr__ = dict.__setitem__

更加简洁,并且不会为将来的__getattr__和__setattr__函数留下任何额外的麻烦空间。