我发现它更方便访问字典键作为obj。foo而不是obj['foo'],所以我写了这个片段:

class AttributeDict(dict):
    def __getattr__(self, attr):
        return self[attr]
    def __setattr__(self, attr, value):
        self[attr] = value

然而,我认为一定有一些原因,Python没有提供开箱即用的功能。以这种方式访问字典键的注意事项和缺陷是什么?


当前回答

没有必要自己写 Setattr()和getattr()已经存在。

类对象的优势可能在类定义和继承中发挥作用。

其他回答

这不是一个“好”的答案,但我认为这是俏皮的(它不处理嵌套字典在当前形式)。简单地将dict包装在函数中:

def make_funcdict(d=None, **kwargs)
    def funcdict(d=None, **kwargs):
        if d is not None:
            funcdict.__dict__.update(d)
        funcdict.__dict__.update(kwargs)
        return funcdict.__dict__
    funcdict(d, **kwargs)
    return funcdict

现在你的语法略有不同。访问dict项就像访问属性f.key一样。要以通常的方式访问dict项(和其他dict方法),请执行f()['key'],我们可以通过使用关键字参数和/或字典调用f来方便地更新dict

例子

d = {'name':'Henry', 'age':31}
d = make_funcdict(d)
>>> for key in d():
...     print key
... 
age
name
>>> print d.name
... Henry
>>> print d.age
... 31
>>> d({'Height':'5-11'}, Job='Carpenter')
... {'age': 31, 'name': 'Henry', 'Job': 'Carpenter', 'Height': '5-11'}

就是这样。如果有人提出这种方法的优点和缺点,我会很高兴。

解决方案是:

DICT_RESERVED_KEYS = vars(dict).keys()


class SmartDict(dict):
    """
    A Dict which is accessible via attribute dot notation
    """
    def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
        """
        :param args: multiple dicts ({}, {}, ..)
        :param kwargs: arbitrary keys='value'

        If ``keyerror=False`` is passed then not found attributes will
        always return None.
        """
        super(SmartDict, self).__init__()
        self['__keyerror'] = kwargs.pop('keyerror', True)
        [self.update(arg) for arg in args if isinstance(arg, dict)]
        self.update(kwargs)

    def __getattr__(self, attr):
        if attr not in DICT_RESERVED_KEYS:
            if self['__keyerror']:
                return self[attr]
            else:
                return self.get(attr)
        return getattr(self, attr)

    def __setattr__(self, key, value):
        if key in DICT_RESERVED_KEYS:
            raise AttributeError("You cannot set a reserved name as attribute")
        self.__setitem__(key, value)

    def __copy__(self):
        return self.__class__(self)

    def copy(self):
        return self.__copy__()

最简单的方法是定义一个类,我们称之为Namespace。在字典上使用对象dict.update()。然后,字典将被视为一个对象。

class Namespace(object):
    '''
    helps referencing object in a dictionary as dict.key instead of dict['key']
    '''
    def __init__(self, adict):
        self.__dict__.update(adict)



Person = Namespace({'name': 'ahmed',
                     'age': 30}) #--> added for edge_cls


print(Person.name)

由于以下原因,我对现有的选项不满意,于是我开发了MetaDict。它的行为完全类似于dict,但支持点表示法和IDE自动补全,而没有其他解决方案的缺点和潜在的名称空间冲突。所有功能和使用示例都可以在GitHub上找到(见上面的链接)。

完全披露:我是MetaDict的作者。

我在尝试其他解决方案时遇到的缺点/限制:

Addict No key autocompletion in IDE Nested key assignment cannot be turned off Newly assigned dict objects are not converted to support attribute-style key access Shadows inbuilt type Dict Prodict No key autocompletion in IDE without defining a static schema (similar to dataclass) No recursive conversion of dict objects when embedded in list or other inbuilt iterables AttrDict No key autocompletion in IDE Converts list objects to tuple behind the scenes Munch Inbuilt methods like items(), update(), etc. can be overwritten with obj.items = [1, 2, 3] No recursive conversion of dict objects when embedded in list or other inbuilt iterables EasyDict Only strings are valid keys, but dict accepts all hashable objects as keys Inbuilt methods like items(), update(), etc. can be overwritten with obj.items = [1, 2, 3] Inbuilt methods don't behave as expected: obj.pop('unknown_key', None) raises an AttributeError

为了给答案增加一些变化,sci-kit learn将其实现为一串:

class Bunch(dict):                                                              
    """ Scikit Learn's container object                                         

    Dictionary-like object that exposes its keys as attributes.                 
    >>> b = Bunch(a=1, b=2)                                                     
    >>> b['b']                                                                  
    2                                                                           
    >>> b.b                                                                     
    2                                                                           
    >>> b.c = 6                                                                 
    >>> b['c']                                                                  
    6                                                                           
    """                                                                         

    def __init__(self, **kwargs):                                               
        super(Bunch, self).__init__(kwargs)                                     

    def __setattr__(self, key, value):                                          
        self[key] = value                                                       

    def __dir__(self):                                                          
        return self.keys()                                                      

    def __getattr__(self, key):                                                 
        try:                                                                    
            return self[key]                                                    
        except KeyError:                                                        
            raise AttributeError(key)                                           

    def __setstate__(self, state):                                              
        pass                       

您所需要的是获取setattr和getattr方法—getattr检查字典键,然后继续检查实际属性。setstaet是针对pickle /unpickling“bunch”的修复-如果感兴趣,请检查https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/6196