如果您喜欢Konrad的流行答案，但希望源代码本身是目标文件夹下的一个文件夹，而不是将它的子文件夹放在目标文件夹下，下面是实现该目的的代码。它返回新创建的DirectoryInfo，这很方便:

public static DirectoryInfo CopyFilesRecursively(DirectoryInfo source, DirectoryInfo target)
{
  var newDirectoryInfo = target.CreateSubdirectory(source.Name);
  foreach (var fileInfo in source.GetFiles())
    fileInfo.CopyTo(Path.Combine(newDirectoryInfo.FullName, fileInfo.Name));

  foreach (var childDirectoryInfo in source.GetDirectories())
    CopyFilesRecursively(childDirectoryInfo, newDirectoryInfo);

  return newDirectoryInfo;
}

复制自MSDN:

using System;
using System.IO;

class CopyDir
{
    public static void Copy(string sourceDirectory, string targetDirectory)
    {
        DirectoryInfo diSource = new DirectoryInfo(sourceDirectory);
        DirectoryInfo diTarget = new DirectoryInfo(targetDirectory);

        CopyAll(diSource, diTarget);
    }

    public static void CopyAll(DirectoryInfo source, DirectoryInfo target)
    {
        Directory.CreateDirectory(target.FullName);

        // Copy each file into the new directory.
        foreach (FileInfo fi in source.GetFiles())
        {
            Console.WriteLine(@"Copying {0}\{1}", target.FullName, fi.Name);
            fi.CopyTo(Path.Combine(target.FullName, fi.Name), true);
        }

        // Copy each subdirectory using recursion.
        foreach (DirectoryInfo diSourceSubDir in source.GetDirectories())
        {
            DirectoryInfo nextTargetSubDir =
                target.CreateSubdirectory(diSourceSubDir.Name);
            CopyAll(diSourceSubDir, nextTargetSubDir);
        }
    }

    public static void Main()
    {
        string sourceDirectory = @"c:\sourceDirectory";
        string targetDirectory = @"c:\targetDirectory";

        Copy(sourceDirectory, targetDirectory);
    }

    // Output will vary based on the contents of the source directory.
}

一个只有一个循环复制所有文件夹和文件的变体:

foreach (var f in Directory.GetFileSystemEntries(path, "*", SearchOption.AllDirectories))
{
    var output = Regex.Replace(f, @"^" + path, newPath);
    if (File.Exists(f)) File.Copy(f, output, true);
    else Directory.CreateDirectory(output);
}

这里有一个简洁而有效的解决方案:

namespace System.IO {
  public static class ExtensionMethods {

    public static void CopyTo(this DirectoryInfo srcPath, string destPath) {
      Directory.CreateDirectory(destPath);
      Parallel.ForEach(srcPath.GetDirectories("*", SearchOption.AllDirectories), 
        srcInfo => Directory.CreateDirectory($"{destPath}{srcInfo.FullName[srcPath.FullName.Length..]}"));
      Parallel.ForEach(srcPath.GetFiles("*", SearchOption.AllDirectories), 
        srcInfo => File.Copy(srcInfo.FullName, $"{destPath}{srcInfo.FullName[srcPath.FullName.Length..]}", true));
      });
    }

  }
}

使用方法:

new DirectoryInfo(sourcePath).CopyTo(destinationPath);

只是想加上我的版本。它可以处理目录和文件，如果目标文件存在，则可以覆盖或跳过。

public static void Copy(
    string source,
    string destination,
    string pattern = "*",
    bool includeSubFolders = true,
    bool overwrite = true,
    bool overwriteOnlyIfSourceIsNewer = false)
{
    if (File.Exists(source))
    {
        // Source is a file, copy and leave
        CopyFile(source, destination);
        return;
    }

    if (!Directory.Exists(source))
    {
        throw new DirectoryNotFoundException($"Source directory does not exists: `{source}`");
    }

    var files = Directory.GetFiles(
        source,
        pattern,
        includeSubFolders ?
            SearchOption.AllDirectories :
            SearchOption.TopDirectoryOnly);

    foreach (var file in files)
    {
        var newFile = file.Replace(source, destination);
        CopyFile(file, newFile, overwrite, overwriteOnlyIfSourceIsNewer);
    }
}

private static void CopyFile(
    string source,
    string destination,
    bool overwrite = true,
    bool overwriteIfSourceIsNewer = false)
{
    if (!overwrite && File.Exists(destination))
    {
        return;
    }

    if (overwriteIfSourceIsNewer && File.Exists(destination))
    {
        var sourceLastModified = File.GetLastWriteTimeUtc(source);
        var destinationLastModified = File.GetLastWriteTimeUtc(destination);
        if (sourceLastModified <= destinationLastModified)
        {
            return;
        }

        CreateDirectory(destination);
        File.Copy(source, destination, overwrite);
        return;
    }

    CreateDirectory(destination);
    File.Copy(source, destination, overwrite);
}

private static void CreateDirectory(string filePath)
{
    var targetDirectory = Path.GetDirectoryName(filePath);
    if (targetDirectory != null && !Directory.Exists(targetDirectory))
    {
        Directory.CreateDirectory(targetDirectory);
    }
}

嗯，我想我误解了这个问题，但我要冒这个险。下面这个简单的方法有什么问题?

public static void CopyFilesRecursively(DirectoryInfo source, DirectoryInfo target) {
    foreach (DirectoryInfo dir in source.GetDirectories())
        CopyFilesRecursively(dir, target.CreateSubdirectory(dir.Name));
    foreach (FileInfo file in source.GetFiles())
        file.CopyTo(Path.Combine(target.FullName, file.Name));
}

由于这篇文章为一个同样简单的问题提供了如此简单的答案，获得了令人印象深刻的反对票，让我补充一个解释。请在投反对票前阅读这篇文章。

首先，这段代码并不打算作为问题中代码的直接替换。这只是为了说明。

microsoft . visualbasic . devices . computer . filesystm . copydirectory执行一些附加的正确性测试(例如，源和目标是否为有效目录，源是否为目标的父目录等)，这些测试在这个答案中是缺失的。该代码可能也更加优化了。

也就是说，代码运行良好。它(几乎完全相同)已经在一个成熟的软件中使用多年了。除了所有IO处理固有的变化无常(例如，如果用户在代码写入USB驱动器时手动拔出USB驱动器会发生什么?)，没有已知的问题。

特别地，我想指出这里使用递归绝对不是问题。无论是在理论上(概念上，这是最优雅的解决方案)还是在实践中:这段代码都不会溢出堆栈。这个堆栈足够大，甚至可以处理嵌套很深的文件层次结构。早在堆栈空间成为问题之前，文件夹路径长度限制就开始生效了。

请注意，恶意用户可能会通过使用每个字母嵌套很深的目录来打破这一假设。我还没试过。但是为了说明这一点:为了使这段代码在典型的计算机上溢出，目录必须嵌套几千次。这是不现实的情况。