什么时候应该使用ThreadLocal变量?
它是如何使用的?
什么时候应该使用ThreadLocal变量?
它是如何使用的?
当前回答
试试这个小例子,感受一下ThreadLocal变量:
public class Book implements Runnable {
private static final ThreadLocal<List<String>> WORDS = ThreadLocal.withInitial(ArrayList::new);
private final String bookName; // It is also the thread's name
private final List<String> words;
public Book(String bookName, List<String> words) {
this.bookName = bookName;
this.words = Collections.unmodifiableList(words);
}
public void run() {
WORDS.get().addAll(words);
System.out.printf("Result %s: '%s'.%n", bookName, String.join(", ", WORDS.get()));
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
Thread t1 = new Thread(new Book("BookA", Arrays.asList("wordA1", "wordA2", "wordA3")));
Thread t2 = new Thread(new Book("BookB", Arrays.asList("wordB1", "wordB2")));
t1.start();
t2.start();
}
}
控制台输出,如果线程BookA先执行: 结果BookA: 'wordA1, wordA2, wordA3'。 结果BookB: 'wordB1, wordB2'。 控制台输出,如果先执行线程BookB: 结果BookB: 'wordB1, wordB2'。 结果BookA: 'wordA1, wordA2, wordA3'。
其他回答
第一个用例——每个线程上下文,提供线程安全性和性能 SpringFramework类中的实时示例-
LocaleContextHolder TransactionContextHolder RequestContextHolder DateTimeContextHolder
第二个用例——当我们不想在线程之间共享一些东西,同时由于性能成本而不想使用同步/锁定时 SimpleDateFormat为日期创建自定义格式
import java.text.SimpleDateFormat;
import java.util.Date;
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService;
import java.util.concurrent.Executors;
/**
* @author - GreenLearner(https://www.youtube.com/c/greenlearner)
*/
public class ThreadLocalDemo1 {
SimpleDateFormat sdf = new SimpleDateFormat("dd-mm-yyyy");//not thread safe
ThreadLocal<SimpleDateFormat> tdl1 = ThreadLocal.withInitial(() -> new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-dd-mm"));
public static void main(String[] args) {
ThreadLocalDemo1 d1 = new ThreadLocalDemo1();
ExecutorService es = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(10);
for(int i=0; i<100; i++) {
es.submit(() -> System.out.println(d1.getDate(new Date())));
}
es.shutdown();
}
String getDate(Date date){
// String s = tsdf.get().format(date);
String s1 = tdl1.get().format(date);
return s1;
}
}
使用技巧
尽可能使用局部变量。这样我们就可以避免使用ThreadLocal 尽可能地将功能委托给框架 如果使用ThreadLocal并将状态设置在其中,请确保在使用后清理它,否则它可能成为OutOfMemoryError的主要原因
ThreadLocal是JVM专门提供的功能,仅为线程提供隔离的存储空间。与实例作用域变量的值一样,变量只能绑定到类的给定实例。每个对象都有其唯一的值,它们不能看到彼此的值。ThreadLocal变量的概念也是如此,在对象实例的意义上,它们是线程的本地线程,除了创建它的线程之外,其他线程看不到它。在这里看到的
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger;
import java.util.stream.IntStream;
public class ThreadId {
private static final AtomicInteger nextId = new AtomicInteger(1000);
// Thread local variable containing each thread's ID
private static final ThreadLocal<Integer> threadId = ThreadLocal.withInitial(() -> nextId.getAndIncrement());
// Returns the current thread's unique ID, assigning it if necessary
public static int get() {
return threadId.get();
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
new Thread(() -> IntStream.range(1, 3).forEach(i -> {
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + " >> " + new ThreadId().get());
})).start();
new Thread(() -> IntStream.range(1, 3).forEach(i -> {
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + " >> " + new ThreadId().get());
})).start();
new Thread(() -> IntStream.range(1, 3).forEach(i -> {
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + " >> " + new ThreadId().get());
})).start();
}
}
Nothing really new here, but I discovered today that ThreadLocal is very useful when using Bean Validation in a web application. Validation messages are localized, but by default use Locale.getDefault(). You can configure the Validator with a different MessageInterpolator, but there's no way to specify the Locale when you call validate. So you could create a static ThreadLocal<Locale> (or better yet, a general container with other things you might need to be ThreadLocal and then have your custom MessageInterpolator pick the Locale from that. Next step is to write a ServletFilter which uses a session value or request.getLocale() to pick the locale and store it in your ThreadLocal reference.
[参考]ThreadLocal无法解决共享对象的更新问题。建议使用staticThreadLocal对象,该对象由同一线程中的所有操作共享。 [必选]remove()方法必须由ThreadLocal变量实现,特别是在使用经常重用线程的线程池时。否则,可能会影响后续的业务逻辑,并导致意想不到的问题,如内存泄漏。
自Java 8发布以来,有更多的声明性方法来初始化ThreadLocal:
ThreadLocal<String> local = ThreadLocal.withInitial(() -> "init value");
在Java 8发布之前,你必须做以下事情:
ThreadLocal<String> local = new ThreadLocal<String>(){
@Override
protected String initialValue() {
return "init value";
}
};
此外,如果用于ThreadLocal的类的实例化方法(构造函数,工厂方法)不接受任何参数,您可以简单地使用方法引用(在Java 8中引入):
class NotThreadSafe {
// no parameters
public NotThreadSafe(){}
}
ThreadLocal<NotThreadSafe> container = ThreadLocal.withInitial(NotThreadSafe::new);
注意: 计算是惰性的,因为你传递的java.util.function.Supplier lambda只在调用ThreadLocal#get但value之前没有计算时才会计算。