什么时候应该使用ThreadLocal变量?
它是如何使用的?
什么时候应该使用ThreadLocal变量?
它是如何使用的?
当前回答
第一个用例——每个线程上下文,提供线程安全性和性能 SpringFramework类中的实时示例-
LocaleContextHolder TransactionContextHolder RequestContextHolder DateTimeContextHolder
第二个用例——当我们不想在线程之间共享一些东西,同时由于性能成本而不想使用同步/锁定时 SimpleDateFormat为日期创建自定义格式
import java.text.SimpleDateFormat;
import java.util.Date;
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService;
import java.util.concurrent.Executors;
/**
* @author - GreenLearner(https://www.youtube.com/c/greenlearner)
*/
public class ThreadLocalDemo1 {
SimpleDateFormat sdf = new SimpleDateFormat("dd-mm-yyyy");//not thread safe
ThreadLocal<SimpleDateFormat> tdl1 = ThreadLocal.withInitial(() -> new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-dd-mm"));
public static void main(String[] args) {
ThreadLocalDemo1 d1 = new ThreadLocalDemo1();
ExecutorService es = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(10);
for(int i=0; i<100; i++) {
es.submit(() -> System.out.println(d1.getDate(new Date())));
}
es.shutdown();
}
String getDate(Date date){
// String s = tsdf.get().format(date);
String s1 = tdl1.get().format(date);
return s1;
}
}
使用技巧
尽可能使用局部变量。这样我们就可以避免使用ThreadLocal 尽可能地将功能委托给框架 如果使用ThreadLocal并将状态设置在其中,请确保在使用后清理它,否则它可能成为OutOfMemoryError的主要原因
其他回答
在Java中,如果您有一个每个线程都可以变化的数据,那么您可以选择将该数据传递给每个需要(或可能需要)它的方法,或者将该数据与线程关联。如果你的所有方法都需要传递一个公共的“上下文”变量,那么到处传递数据可能是可行的。
如果不是这样,您可能不希望用额外的参数来打乱方法签名。在非线程环境中,可以使用Java中等价的全局变量来解决这个问题。在线程词中,与全局变量等价的是线程局部变量。
在《Java并发实践》一书中有一个很好的例子。作者(Joshua Bloch)解释了线程限制是实现线程安全的最简单方法之一,而ThreadLocal是维护线程限制的更正式的方法。最后,他还解释了人们如何滥用它作为全局变量。
我已经从提到的书中复制了文本,但代码3.10是缺失的,因为它不太重要,了解ThreadLocal应该在哪里使用。
Thread-local variables are often used to prevent sharing in designs based on mutable Singletons or global variables. For example, a single-threaded application might maintain a global database connection that is initialized at startup to avoid having to pass a Connection to every method. Since JDBC connections may not be thread-safe, a multithreaded application that uses a global connection without additional coordination is not thread-safe either. By using a ThreadLocal to store the JDBC connection, as in ConnectionHolder in Listing 3.10, each thread will have its own connection. ThreadLocal is widely used in implementing application frameworks. For example, J2EE containers associate a transaction context with an executing thread for the duration of an EJB call. This is easily implemented using a static Thread-Local holding the transaction context: when framework code needs to determine what transaction is currently running, it fetches the transaction context from this ThreadLocal. This is convenient in that it reduces the need to pass execution context information into every method, but couples any code that uses this mechanism to the framework. It is easy to abuse ThreadLocal by treating its thread confinement property as a license to use global variables or as a means of creating “hidden” method arguments. Like global variables, thread-local variables can detract from reusability and introduce hidden couplings among classes, and should therefore be used with care.
Webapp服务器可能会保留一个线程池,并且在响应客户端之前应该删除ThreadLocal变量,因此当前线程可能会被下一个请求重用。
文档说得很好:“每个访问[线程局部变量]的线程(通过它的get或set方法)都有它自己的、独立初始化的变量副本”。
当每个线程必须有自己的某个副本时,可以使用一个。默认情况下,数据在线程之间共享。
Nothing really new here, but I discovered today that ThreadLocal is very useful when using Bean Validation in a web application. Validation messages are localized, but by default use Locale.getDefault(). You can configure the Validator with a different MessageInterpolator, but there's no way to specify the Locale when you call validate. So you could create a static ThreadLocal<Locale> (or better yet, a general container with other things you might need to be ThreadLocal and then have your custom MessageInterpolator pick the Locale from that. Next step is to write a ServletFilter which uses a session value or request.getLocale() to pick the locale and store it in your ThreadLocal reference.