在Java中，如果您有一个每个线程都可以变化的数据，那么您可以选择将该数据传递给每个需要(或可能需要)它的方法，或者将该数据与线程关联。如果你的所有方法都需要传递一个公共的“上下文”变量，那么到处传递数据可能是可行的。

如果不是这样，您可能不希望用额外的参数来打乱方法签名。在非线程环境中，可以使用Java中等价的全局变量来解决这个问题。在线程词中，与全局变量等价的是线程局部变量。

Nothing really new here, but I discovered today that ThreadLocal is very useful when using Bean Validation in a web application. Validation messages are localized, but by default use Locale.getDefault(). You can configure the Validator with a different MessageInterpolator, but there's no way to specify the Locale when you call validate. So you could create a static ThreadLocal<Locale> (or better yet, a general container with other things you might need to be ThreadLocal and then have your custom MessageInterpolator pick the Locale from that. Next step is to write a ServletFilter which uses a session value or request.getLocale() to pick the locale and store it in your ThreadLocal reference.

Many frameworks use ThreadLocals to maintain some context related to the current thread. For example when the current transaction is stored in a ThreadLocal, you don't need to pass it as a parameter through every method call, in case someone down the stack needs access to it. Web applications might store information about the current request and session in a ThreadLocal, so that the application has easy access to them. With Guice you can use ThreadLocals when implementing custom scopes for the injected objects (Guice's default servlet scopes most probably use them as well).

ThreadLocals are one sort of global variables (although slightly less evil because they are restricted to one thread), so you should be careful when using them to avoid unwanted side-effects and memory leaks. Design your APIs so that the ThreadLocal values will always be automatically cleared when they are not needed anymore and that incorrect use of the API won't be possible (for example like this). ThreadLocals can be used to make the code cleaner, and in some rare cases they are the only way to make something work (my current project had two such cases; they are documented here under "Static Fields and Global Variables").

Threadlocal提供了一种非常简单的零成本实现对象可重用性的方法。

我遇到过这样一种情况，在每次更新通知时，多个线程都在创建可变缓存的映像。

我在每个线程上使用Threadlocal，然后每个线程只需要重置旧映像，然后在每次更新通知时从缓存中再次更新它。

来自对象池的通常可重用对象具有与之相关的线程安全成本，而此方法没有。

ThreadLocal是JVM专门提供的功能，仅为线程提供隔离的存储空间。与实例作用域变量的值一样，变量只能绑定到类的给定实例。每个对象都有其唯一的值，它们不能看到彼此的值。ThreadLocal变量的概念也是如此，在对象实例的意义上，它们是线程的本地线程，除了创建它的线程之外，其他线程看不到它。在这里看到的

import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger;
import java.util.stream.IntStream;


public class ThreadId {
private static final AtomicInteger nextId = new AtomicInteger(1000);

// Thread local variable containing each thread's ID
private static final ThreadLocal<Integer> threadId = ThreadLocal.withInitial(() -> nextId.getAndIncrement());


// Returns the current thread's unique ID, assigning it if necessary
public static int get() {
    return threadId.get();
}

public static void main(String[] args) {

    new Thread(() -> IntStream.range(1, 3).forEach(i -> {
        System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + " >> " + new ThreadId().get());
    })).start();

    new Thread(() -> IntStream.range(1, 3).forEach(i -> {
        System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + " >> " + new ThreadId().get());
    })).start();

    new Thread(() -> IntStream.range(1, 3).forEach(i -> {
        System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + " >> " + new ThreadId().get());
    })).start();

}
}

由于ThreadLocal是对给定线程中的数据的引用，因此在使用线程池的应用服务器中使用ThreadLocal时，可能会导致类加载泄漏。在使用ThreadLocal的remove()方法清理你get()或set()的任何ThreadLocals时，你需要非常小心。

如果你在完成时不清理，它持有的任何类的引用作为部署的webapp的一部分将保留在永久堆中，永远不会被垃圾收集。重新部署/取消部署webapp不会清除每个线程对你的webapp类的引用，因为线程不是你的webapp所拥有的。每次后续部署都将创建该类的新实例，该实例永远不会被垃圾收集。

由于java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: PermGen空间，你最终会出现内存不足的异常，在谷歌搜索之后可能只是增加-XX:MaxPermSize，而不是修复这个错误。

如果您最终遇到了这些问题，您可以通过使用Eclipse的Memory Analyzer和/或遵循Frank Kieviet的指南和后续内容来确定哪个线程和类保留了这些引用。

更新:重新发现Alex Vasseur的博客条目，它帮助我找到了一些我遇到的ThreadLocal问题。