I've been working with a small group of people on a coding project for fun. It's an organized and fairly cohesive group. The people I work with all have various skill sets related to programming, but some of them use older or outright wrong methods, such as excessive global variables, poor naming conventions, and other things. While things work, the implementation is poor. What's a good way to politely ask or introduce them to use better methodology, without it coming across as questioning (or insulting) their experience and/or education?


当前回答

他们可能也认为你的风格很糟糕。让团队一起讨论一套一致的编码风格指南。同意某事。这是否适合你的风格并不是问题,选择任何风格只要它是一致的才是重要的。

其他回答

人们编写糟糕的代码只是无知的一种症状(这与愚蠢不同)。这里有一些对付这种人的技巧。

Peoples own experience leaves a stronger impression than something you will say. Some people are not passionate about the code they produce and will not listen to anything you say Paired Programming can help share ideas but switch who's driving or they'll just be checking email on their phone Don't drown them with too much, I've found even Continuous Integration needed to be explained a few times to some older devs Get them excited again and they will want to learn. It could be something as simple as programming robots for a day TRUST YOUR TEAM, coding standards and tools that check them at build time are often never read or annoying. Remove Code Ownership, on some projects you will see code silos or ant hills where people say thats my code and you can't change it, this is very bad and you can use paired programming to remove this.

我穿上长袍,打开一罐苏格拉底方法。

苏格拉底方法以古希腊哲学家苏格拉底的名字命名,是一种哲学探究的形式,提问者探究他人立场的含义,以激发理性思考和阐明思想。这种辩证方法经常涉及到一种对立的讨论,在这种讨论中,一种观点的辩护与另一种观点相对抗;一个参与者可能会导致另一个人在某种程度上自相矛盾,加强询问者自己的观点。

Privately inquire about some of the "bad" code segments with an eye toward the possibility that it is actually reasonable code, (no matter how predisposed you may be), or that there are perhaps extenuating circumstances. If you are still convinced that the code is just plain bad -- and that the source actually is this person -- just go away. One of several things may happen: 1) the person notices and takes some corrective action, 2) the person does nothing (is oblivious, or doesn't care as much as you do).

如果#2发生了,或者从你的角度来看,#1并没有带来足够的改进,并且它正在损害项目,并且/或对你造成了足够的影响,那么可能是时候在团队中开始建立/执行标准了。这需要管理层的支持,但只有从基层做起才最有效。

祝你好运。我能感受到你的痛苦,兄弟。

与其让他们写代码,不如让他们维护代码。

除非他们不得不维护他们那堆冒着热气的意大利面,否则他们永远不会明白自己在编码方面有多糟糕。

我和和我一起工作的人有类似的情况。他们不像我那样接触编码,但他们在编码方面仍然很有用。

而不是我让他们做他们想做的然后回去编辑整篇文章。我通常只是让他们坐下来,告诉他们两种做事的方法。他们的方式和我的方式,从这里我们讨论了每种方法的优缺点,因此对我们应该如何进行编程有了更好的理解和更好的结论。

这是真正令人惊讶的部分。有时他们会提出一些连我都不知道答案的问题,经过研究,我们都对方法论和结构有了更好的概念。

讨论。 告诉他们为什么 甚至不要认为你总是对的。有时甚至他们也会教你一些新东西。

如果我是你,我也会这么做