二进制信号量和互斥量之间有区别吗?或者它们本质上是相同的?


当前回答

在Windows上,互斥量和二进制信号量之间有两个区别:

互斥锁只能由拥有所有权的线程释放,即之前调用Wait函数的线程(或在创建互斥锁时获得所有权的线程)。任何线程都可以释放信号量。 线程可以在互斥锁上重复调用等待函数而不会阻塞。但是,如果你在一个二进制信号量上调用了两次等待函数,而中间没有释放信号量,线程就会阻塞。

其他回答

在窗口,差异如下所示。 MUTEX:成功执行等待的进程必须执行一个信号,反之亦然。二进制信号量:不同的进程可以在一个信号量上执行等待或信号操作。

在Windows上,互斥量和二进制信号量之间有两个区别:

互斥锁只能由拥有所有权的线程释放,即之前调用Wait函数的线程(或在创建互斥锁时获得所有权的线程)。任何线程都可以释放信号量。 线程可以在互斥锁上重复调用等待函数而不会阻塞。但是,如果你在一个二进制信号量上调用了两次等待函数,而中间没有释放信号量,线程就会阻塞。

I think most of the answers here were confusing especially those saying that mutex can be released only by the process that holds it but semaphore can be signaled by ay process. The above line is kind of vague in terms of semaphore. To understand we should know that there are two kinds of semaphore one is called counting semaphore and the other is called a binary semaphore. In counting semaphore handles access to n number of resources where n can be defined before the use. Each semaphore has a count variable, which keeps the count of the number of resources in use, initially, it is set to n. Each process that wishes to uses a resource performs a wait() operation on the semaphore (thereby decrementing the count). When a process releases a resource, it performs a release() operation (incrementing the count). When the count becomes 0, all the resources are being used. After that, the process waits until the count becomes more than 0. Now here is the catch only the process that holds the resource can increase the count no other process can increase the count only the processes holding a resource can increase the count and the process waiting for the semaphore again checks and when it sees the resource available it decreases the count again. So in terms of binary semaphore, only the process holding the semaphore can increase the count, and count remains zero until it stops using the semaphore and increases the count and other process gets the chance to access the semaphore.

二进制信号量和互斥量之间的主要区别在于,信号量是一种信号机制,而互斥量是一种锁定机制,但二进制信号量的功能似乎与互斥量类似,这造成了混乱,但两者是适用于不同类型工作的不同概念。

互斥锁

Until recently, the only sleeping lock in the kernel was the semaphore. Most users of semaphores instantiated a semaphore with a count of one and treated them as a mutual exclusion lock—a sleeping version of the spin-lock. Unfortunately, semaphores are rather generic and do not impose any usage constraints. This makes them useful for managing exclusive access in obscure situations, such as complicated dances between the kernel and userspace. But it also means that simpler locking is harder to do, and the lack of enforced rules makes any sort of automated debugging or constraint enforcement impossible. Seeking a simpler sleeping lock, the kernel developers introduced the mutex.Yes, as you are now accustomed to, that is a confusing name. Let’s clarify.The term “mutex” is a generic name to refer to any sleeping lock that enforces mutual exclusion, such as a semaphore with a usage count of one. In recent Linux kernels, the proper noun “mutex” is now also a specific type of sleeping lock that implements mutual exclusion.That is, a mutex is a mutex.

互斥锁的简单性和效率来自于它在信号量要求之外强加给用户的附加约束。信号量是按照Dijkstra的原始设计来实现最基本的行为,而互斥锁则不同,它的用例更严格、更窄: n一次只能有一个任务持有互斥锁。也就是说,互斥锁的使用计数总是1。

Whoever locked a mutex must unlock it. That is, you cannot lock a mutex in one context and then unlock it in another. This means that the mutex isn’t suitable for more complicated synchronizations between kernel and user-space. Most use cases, however, cleanly lock and unlock from the same context. Recursive locks and unlocks are not allowed. That is, you cannot recursively acquire the same mutex, and you cannot unlock an unlocked mutex. A process cannot exit while holding a mutex. A mutex cannot be acquired by an interrupt handler or bottom half, even with mutex_trylock(). A mutex can be managed only via the official API: It must be initialized via the methods described in this section and cannot be copied, hand initialized, or reinitialized.

[1] Linux内核开发,第三版Robert Love

答案可能取决于目标操作系统。例如,我所熟悉的至少一个RTOS实现允许对单个OS互斥量进行多个连续的“get”操作,只要它们都来自同一个线程上下文中。在允许另一个线程获得互斥量之前,多个get必须被相等数量的put替换。这与二进制信号量不同,对于二进制信号量,无论线程上下文如何,一次只允许一个get。

这种互斥锁背后的思想是,通过一次只允许一个上下文修改数据来保护对象。即使线程获得了互斥量,然后调用进一步修改对象的函数(并在自己的操作周围获得/放置保护互斥量),这些操作仍然应该是安全的,因为它们都发生在单个线程下。

{
    mutexGet();  // Other threads can no longer get the mutex.

    // Make changes to the protected object.
    // ...

    objectModify();  // Also gets/puts the mutex.  Only allowed from this thread context.

    // Make more changes to the protected object.
    // ...

    mutexPut();  // Finally allows other threads to get the mutex.
}

当然,在使用此特性时,必须确保单个线程中的所有访问都是安全的!

我不确定这种方法有多普遍,或者它是否适用于我所熟悉的系统之外。有关这种互斥锁的示例,请参阅ThreadX RTOS。