虽然它们(大部分)是相同的(参见下面的一个[错误]差异)，但您绝对应该注意并应该使用Int32。

The name for a 16-bit integer is Int16. For a 64 bit integer it's Int64, and for a 32-bit integer the intuitive choice is: int or Int32? The question of the size of a variable of type Int16, Int32, or Int64 is self-referencing, but the question of the size of a variable of type int is a perfectly valid question and questions, no matter how trivial, are distracting, lead to confusion, waste time, hinder discussion, etc. (the fact this question exists proves the point). Using Int32 promotes that the developer is conscious of their choice of type. How big is an int again? Oh yeah, 32. The likelihood that the size of the type will actually be considered is greater when the size is included in the name. Using Int32 also promotes knowledge of the other choices. When people aren't forced to at least recognize there are alternatives it become far too easy for int to become "THE integer type". The class within the framework intended to interact with 32-bit integers is named Int32. Once again, which is: more intuitive, less confusing, lacks an (unnecessary) translation (not a translation in the system, but in the mind of the developer), etc. int lMax = Int32.MaxValue or Int32 lMax = Int32.MaxValue? int isn't a keyword in all .NET languages. Although there are arguments why it's not likely to ever change, int may not always be an Int32.

缺点是要多输入两个字符和[bug]。

这不会编译

public enum MyEnum : Int32
{
    AEnum = 0
}

但这将:

public enum MyEnum : int
{
    AEnum = 0
}

你不应该在意。如果大小是一个问题，我会使用字节，短，int，然后长。使用int型比int32大的唯一原因是需要一个大于2147483647或小于-2147483648的数。

除此之外，我不在乎，还有很多其他的事情需要关心。

它们都声明了32位整数，正如其他作者所述，使用哪一个主要是语法风格的问题。然而，他们并不总是以同样的方式表现。例如，c#编译器不允许这样做:

public enum MyEnum : Int32
{
    member1 = 0
}

但是它允许这样做:

public enum MyEnum : int
{
    member1 = 0
}

图。

我使用int是为了防止Microsoft将整数的默认实现更改为一些新版本(我们称其为Int32b)。

然后，Microsoft可以将int别名更改为Int32b，我不需要更改任何代码就可以利用他们新的(希望是改进的)整数实现。

这同样适用于任何类型关键字。

ECMA-334:2006 c#语言规范(p18)

每个预定义类型都是系统提供类型的简写。例如，关键字int指向结构体System.Int32。就风格而言，使用关键字优于使用完整的系统类型名。

我总是在定义变量时使用别名类型(int, string等)，在访问静态方法时使用真实名称:

int x, y;
...
String.Format ("{0}x{1}", x, y);

看到像int.TryParse()这样的东西似乎很难看。除了风格，我这么做没有别的原因。