Moq版本4.8(或更高版本)对by-ref参数的支持有了很大的改进:

public interface IGobbler
{
    bool Gobble(ref int amount);
}

delegate void GobbleCallback(ref int amount);     // needed for Callback
delegate bool GobbleReturns(ref int amount);      // needed for Returns

var mock = new Mock<IGobbler>();
mock.Setup(m => m.Gobble(ref It.Ref<int>.IsAny))  // match any value passed by-ref
    .Callback(new GobbleCallback((ref int amount) =>
     {
         if (amount > 0)
         {
             Console.WriteLine("Gobbling...");
             amount -= 1;
         }
     }))
    .Returns(new GobbleReturns((ref int amount) => amount > 0));

int a = 5;
bool gobbleSomeMore = true;
while (gobbleSomeMore)
{
    gobbleSomeMore = mock.Object.Gobble(ref a);
}

同样的模式也适用于参数。

It.Ref < T >。IsAny也适用于c# 7的参数(因为它们也是by-ref)。

Moq版本4.8(或更高版本)对by-ref参数的支持有了很大的改进:

public interface IGobbler
{
    bool Gobble(ref int amount);
}

delegate void GobbleCallback(ref int amount);     // needed for Callback
delegate bool GobbleReturns(ref int amount);      // needed for Returns

var mock = new Mock<IGobbler>();
mock.Setup(m => m.Gobble(ref It.Ref<int>.IsAny))  // match any value passed by-ref
    .Callback(new GobbleCallback((ref int amount) =>
     {
         if (amount > 0)
         {
             Console.WriteLine("Gobbling...");
             amount -= 1;
         }
     }))
    .Returns(new GobbleReturns((ref int amount) => amount > 0));

int a = 5;
bool gobbleSomeMore = true;
while (gobbleSomeMore)
{
    gobbleSomeMore = mock.Object.Gobble(ref a);
}

同样的模式也适用于参数。

It.Ref < T >。IsAny也适用于c# 7的参数(因为它们也是by-ref)。

今天下午，我为此纠结了一个小时，但在任何地方都找不到答案。在我自己玩了一圈之后，我能够想出一个适合我的解决方案。

string firstOutParam = "first out parameter string";
string secondOutParam = 100;
mock.SetupAllProperties();
mock.Setup(m=>m.Method(out firstOutParam, out secondOutParam)).Returns(value);

这里的关键是mock.SetupAllProperties();这将为您清除所有属性。这可能并不适用于每个测试用例场景，但如果您所关心的只是获取YourMethod的返回值，那么这将很好地工作。

在Billy Jakes awnser的基础上，我用一个out参数做了一个完全动态的模拟方法。我把这个贴在这里给那些觉得有用的人。

// Define a delegate with the params of the method that returns void.
delegate void methodDelegate(int x, out string output);

// Define a variable to store the return value.
bool returnValue;

// Mock the method: 
// Do all logic in .Callback and store the return value.
// Then return the return value in the .Returns
mockHighlighter.Setup(h => h.SomeMethod(It.IsAny<int>(), out It.Ref<int>.IsAny))
  .Callback(new methodDelegate((int x, out int output) =>
  {
    // do some logic to set the output and return value.
    output = ...
    returnValue = ...
  }))
  .Returns(() => returnValue);

这是一个解决方案。

[Test]
public void TestForOutParameterInMoq()
{
  //Arrange
  _mockParameterManager= new Mock<IParameterManager>();

  Mock<IParameter > mockParameter= new Mock<IParameter >();
  //Parameter affectation should be useless but is not. It's really used by Moq 
  IParameter parameter= mockParameter.Object;

  //Mock method used in UpperParameterManager
  _mockParameterManager.Setup(x => x.OutMethod(out parameter));

  //Act with the real instance
  _UpperParameterManager.UpperOutMethod(out parameter);

  //Assert that method used on the out parameter of inner out method are really called
  mockParameter.Verify(x => x.FunctionCalledInOutMethodAfterInnerOutMethod(),Times.Once());

}

我相信斯科特的解决方案在某种程度上是有效的，

但是不使用反射来窥探私有api是一个很好的理由。它现在坏了。

我可以使用委托设置参数

      delegate void MockOutDelegate(string s, out int value);

    public void SomeMethod()
    {
        ....

         int value;
         myMock.Setup(x => x.TryDoSomething(It.IsAny<string>(), out value))
            .Callback(new MockOutDelegate((string s, out int output) => output = userId))
            .Returns(true);
    }