我有以下代码:
info = new System.Diagnostics.ProcessStartInfo("TheProgram.exe", String.Join(" ", args));
info.CreateNoWindow = true;
info.WindowStyle = System.Diagnostics.ProcessWindowStyle.Hidden;
info.RedirectStandardOutput = true;
info.UseShellExecute = false;
System.Diagnostics.Process p = System.Diagnostics.Process.Start(info);
p.WaitForExit();
Console.WriteLine(p.StandardOutput.ReadToEnd()); //need the StandardOutput contents
我知道我正在启动的进程的输出大约有7MB长。在Windows控制台中运行它可以正常工作。不幸的是，从编程的角度来看，它会无限期地挂在WaitForExit上。还要注意，对于较小的输出(比如3KB)，这段代码不会挂起。
ProcessStartInfo中的内部StandardOutput是否可能不能缓冲7MB?如果是，我该怎么办?如果不是，我做错了什么?
我也有同样的问题，但原因不同。但是在Windows 8下会发生，而在Windows 7下不会。下面这行似乎是导致这个问题的原因。
pProcess.StartInfo.UseShellExecute = False
解决方案是不禁用UseShellExecute。我现在收到一个Shell弹出窗口，这是不需要的，但比程序等待什么特别的事情发生要好得多。所以我添加了如下的解决方法:
pProcess.StartInfo.WindowStyle = ProcessWindowStyle.Hidden
现在唯一让我困扰的是为什么在Windows 8下会出现这种情况。
未处理的ObjectDisposedException问题发生在进程超时时。在这种情况下，条件的其他部分:
if (process.WaitForExit(timeout)
&& outputWaitHandle.WaitOne(timeout)
&& errorWaitHandle.WaitOne(timeout))
不执行。我用以下方法解决了这个问题:
using (AutoResetEvent outputWaitHandle = new AutoResetEvent(false))
using (AutoResetEvent errorWaitHandle = new AutoResetEvent(false))
{
using (Process process = new Process())
{
// preparing ProcessStartInfo
try
{
process.OutputDataReceived += (sender, e) =>
{
if (e.Data == null)
{
outputWaitHandle.Set();
}
else
{
outputBuilder.AppendLine(e.Data);
}
};
process.ErrorDataReceived += (sender, e) =>
{
if (e.Data == null)
{
errorWaitHandle.Set();
}
else
{
errorBuilder.AppendLine(e.Data);
}
};
process.Start();
process.BeginOutputReadLine();
process.BeginErrorReadLine();
if (process.WaitForExit(timeout))
{
exitCode = process.ExitCode;
}
else
{
// timed out
}
output = outputBuilder.ToString();
}
finally
{
outputWaitHandle.WaitOne(timeout);
errorWaitHandle.WaitOne(timeout);
}
}
}
我读了很多答案，并给出了自己的答案。不确定这个在任何情况下都会修复，但它在我的环境中修复了。我没有使用WaitForExit，而是使用WaitHandle。在输出和错误端信号上等待所有。如果有人能发现可能存在的问题，我会很高兴。或者它是否能帮助别人。对我来说更好，因为不用暂停。
private static int DoProcess(string workingDir, string fileName, string arguments)
{
int exitCode;
using (var process = new Process
{
StartInfo =
{
WorkingDirectory = workingDir,
WindowStyle = ProcessWindowStyle.Hidden,
CreateNoWindow = true,
UseShellExecute = false,
FileName = fileName,
Arguments = arguments,
RedirectStandardError = true,
RedirectStandardOutput = true
},
EnableRaisingEvents = true
})
{
using (var outputWaitHandle = new AutoResetEvent(false))
using (var errorWaitHandle = new AutoResetEvent(false))
{
process.OutputDataReceived += (sender, args) =>
{
// ReSharper disable once AccessToDisposedClosure
if (args.Data != null) Debug.Log(args.Data);
else outputWaitHandle.Set();
};
process.ErrorDataReceived += (sender, args) =>
{
// ReSharper disable once AccessToDisposedClosure
if (args.Data != null) Debug.LogError(args.Data);
else errorWaitHandle.Set();
};
process.Start();
process.BeginOutputReadLine();
process.BeginErrorReadLine();
WaitHandle.WaitAll(new WaitHandle[] { outputWaitHandle, errorWaitHandle });
exitCode = process.ExitCode;
}
}
return exitCode;
}
我知道这是晚餐，但是，在读完这一整页后，没有一个解决方案对我来说是有效的，尽管我没有尝试Muhammad Rehan，因为代码有点难理解，尽管我猜他是在正确的轨道上。当我说它不工作时，这并不完全正确，有时它会工作得很好，我猜这与EOF标记之前的输出长度有关。
不管怎样，对我来说有效的解决方案是使用不同的线程来读取StandardOutput和StandardError并写入消息。
StreamWriter sw = null;
var queue = new ConcurrentQueue<string>();
var flushTask = new System.Timers.Timer(50);
flushTask.Elapsed += (s, e) =>
{
while (!queue.IsEmpty)
{
string line = null;
if (queue.TryDequeue(out line))
sw.WriteLine(line);
}
sw.FlushAsync();
};
flushTask.Start();
using (var process = new Process())
{
try
{
process.StartInfo.FileName = @"...";
process.StartInfo.Arguments = $"...";
process.StartInfo.UseShellExecute = false;
process.StartInfo.RedirectStandardOutput = true;
process.StartInfo.RedirectStandardError = true;
process.Start();
var outputRead = Task.Run(() =>
{
while (!process.StandardOutput.EndOfStream)
{
queue.Enqueue(process.StandardOutput.ReadLine());
}
});
var errorRead = Task.Run(() =>
{
while (!process.StandardError.EndOfStream)
{
queue.Enqueue(process.StandardError.ReadLine());
}
});
var timeout = new TimeSpan(hours: 0, minutes: 10, seconds: 0);
if (Task.WaitAll(new[] { outputRead, errorRead }, timeout) &&
process.WaitForExit((int)timeout.TotalMilliseconds))
{
if (process.ExitCode != 0)
{
throw new Exception($"Failed run... blah blah");
}
}
else
{
throw new Exception($"process timed out after waiting {timeout}");
}
}
catch (Exception e)
{
throw new Exception($"Failed to succesfully run the process.....", e);
}
}
}
希望这能帮助那些认为这很难的人!
我试图通过考虑Mark Byers, Rob, stevejay的回答，创建一个类来解决你使用异步流读取的问题。这样做，我意识到有一个与异步流程输出流读取相关的错误。
我在微软报告了这个漏洞:https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/3119134
简介:
You can't do that:
process.BeginOutputReadLine(); process.Start();
You will receive System.InvalidOperationException : StandardOut has
not been redirected or the process hasn't started yet.
============================================================================================================================
Then you have to start asynchronous output read after the process is
started:
process.Start(); process.BeginOutputReadLine();
Doing so, make a race condition because the output stream can receive
data before you set it to asynchronous:
process.Start();
// Here the operating system could give the cpu to another thread.
// For example, the newly created thread (Process) and it could start writing to the output
// immediately before next line would execute.
// That create a race condition.
process.BeginOutputReadLine();
============================================================================================================================
Then some people could say that you just have to read the stream
before you set it to asynchronous. But the same problem occurs. There
will be a race condition between the synchronous read and set the
stream into asynchronous mode.
============================================================================================================================
There is no way to acheive safe asynchronous read of an output stream
of a process in the actual way "Process" and "ProcessStartInfo" has
been designed.
对于您的情况，您最好使用其他用户建议的异步读取。但是您应该意识到，由于竞态条件，您可能会错过一些信息。
