我也有同样的问题，但原因不同。但是在Windows 8下会发生，而在Windows 7下不会。下面这行似乎是导致这个问题的原因。

pProcess.StartInfo.UseShellExecute = False

解决方案是不禁用UseShellExecute。我现在收到一个Shell弹出窗口，这是不需要的，但比程序等待什么特别的事情发生要好得多。所以我添加了如下的解决方法:

pProcess.StartInfo.WindowStyle = ProcessWindowStyle.Hidden

现在唯一让我困扰的是为什么在Windows 8下会出现这种情况。

我试图通过考虑Mark Byers, Rob, stevejay的回答，创建一个类来解决你使用异步流读取的问题。这样做，我意识到有一个与异步流程输出流读取相关的错误。

我在微软报告了这个漏洞:https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/3119134

简介:

You can't do that: process.BeginOutputReadLine(); process.Start(); You will receive System.InvalidOperationException : StandardOut has not been redirected or the process hasn't started yet. ============================================================================================================================ Then you have to start asynchronous output read after the process is started: process.Start(); process.BeginOutputReadLine(); Doing so, make a race condition because the output stream can receive data before you set it to asynchronous:

process.Start(); 
// Here the operating system could give the cpu to another thread.  
// For example, the newly created thread (Process) and it could start writing to the output
// immediately before next line would execute. 
// That create a race condition.
process.BeginOutputReadLine();

============================================================================================================================ Then some people could say that you just have to read the stream before you set it to asynchronous. But the same problem occurs. There will be a race condition between the synchronous read and set the stream into asynchronous mode. ============================================================================================================================ There is no way to acheive safe asynchronous read of an output stream of a process in the actual way "Process" and "ProcessStartInfo" has been designed.

对于您的情况，您最好使用其他用户建议的异步读取。但是您应该意识到，由于竞态条件，您可能会错过一些信息。

我认为使用async，可以有一个更优雅的解决方案，即使同时使用standardOutput和standardError也不会出现死锁:

using (Process process = new Process())
{
    process.StartInfo.FileName = filename;
    process.StartInfo.Arguments = arguments;
    process.StartInfo.UseShellExecute = false;
    process.StartInfo.RedirectStandardOutput = true;
    process.StartInfo.RedirectStandardError = true;

    process.Start();

    var tStandardOutput = process.StandardOutput.ReadToEndAsync();
    var tStandardError = process.StandardError.ReadToEndAsync();

    if (process.WaitForExit(timeout))
    {
        string output = await tStandardOutput;
        string errors = await tStandardError;

        // Process completed. Check process.ExitCode here.
    }
    else
    {
        // Timed out.
    }
}

这是基于Mark Byers的回答。 如果你不在异步方法中，你可以使用string output = tStandardOutput.result;而不是等待

我也有同样的问题，但原因不同。但是在Windows 8下会发生，而在Windows 7下不会。下面这行似乎是导致这个问题的原因。

pProcess.StartInfo.UseShellExecute = False

解决方案是不禁用UseShellExecute。我现在收到一个Shell弹出窗口，这是不需要的，但比程序等待什么特别的事情发生要好得多。所以我添加了如下的解决方法:

pProcess.StartInfo.WindowStyle = ProcessWindowStyle.Hidden

现在唯一让我困扰的是为什么在Windows 8下会出现这种情况。

罗布接了电话，帮我省了几个小时的时间。在等待之前读取输出/错误缓冲区:

// Read the output stream first and then wait.
string output = p.StandardOutput.ReadToEnd();
p.WaitForExit();

流程的文档。StandardOutput说在你等待之前读取，否则你会死锁，代码片段复制如下:

 // Start the child process.
 Process p = new Process();
 // Redirect the output stream of the child process.
 p.StartInfo.UseShellExecute = false;
 p.StartInfo.RedirectStandardOutput = true;
 p.StartInfo.FileName = "Write500Lines.exe";
 p.Start();
 // Do not wait for the child process to exit before
 // reading to the end of its redirected stream.
 // p.WaitForExit();
 // Read the output stream first and then wait.
 string output = p.StandardOutput.ReadToEnd();
 p.WaitForExit();