抛弃std::allocator以支持自定义解决方案的一些真正好的理由是什么?您是否遇到过这样的情况:它对于正确性、性能、可伸缩性等来说是绝对必要的?有什么聪明的例子吗?

自定义分配器一直是标准库的一个特性,但我并不太需要它。我只是想知道是否有人能提供一些令人信服的例子来证明他们的存在。


当前回答

I personally use Loki::Allocator / SmallObject to optimize memory usage for small objects — it show good efficiency and satisfying performance if you have to work with moderate amounts of really small objects (1 to 256 bytes). It can be up to ~30 times more efficient than standard C++ new/delete allocation if we talk about allocating moderate amounts of small objects of many different sizes. Also, there's a VC-specific solution called "QuickHeap", it brings best possible performance (allocate and deallocate operations just read and write the address of the block being allocated/returned to heap, respectively in up to 99.(9)% cases — depends on settings and initialization), but at a cost of a notable overhead — it needs two pointers per extent and one extra for each new memory block. It's a fastest possible solution for working with huge (10 000++) amounts of objects being created and deleted if you don't need a big variety of object sizes (it creates an individual pool for each object size, from 1 to 1023 bytes in current implementation, so initialization costs may belittle the overall performance boost, but one can go ahead and allocate/deallocate some dummy objects before the application enters it's performance-critical phase(s)).

标准的c++ new/delete实现的问题是,它通常只是C malloc/free分配的包装器,它适用于较大的内存块,比如1024+字节。它在性能方面有显著的开销,有时还会占用额外的内存用于映射。因此,在大多数情况下,自定义分配器的实现方式是最大化性能和/或最小化分配小对象(≤1024字节)所需的额外内存量。

其他回答

使用自定义分配器来使用内存池而不是堆可能会很有用。这只是众多例子中的一个。

对于大多数情况,这肯定是一个不成熟的优化。但它在某些情况下(嵌入式设备、游戏等)非常有用。

我没有使用自定义STL分配器编写c++代码,但我可以想象一个用c++编写的web服务器,它使用自定义分配器自动删除响应HTTP请求所需的临时数据。自定义分配器可以在生成响应后立即释放所有临时数据。

自定义分配器(我已经使用过)的另一个可能的用例是编写一个单元测试来证明函数的行为不依赖于它的某些输入。自定义分配器可以用任何模式填充内存区域。

我正在研究一个mmap-分配器,它允许向量使用内存 内存映射文件。我们的目标是让向量使用这样的存储 直接在由mmap映射的虚拟内存中。我们的问题是 提高真正大的文件(>10GB)的读取到内存,而不复制 开销,因此我需要这个自定义分配器。

到目前为止,我已经有了一个自定义分配器的骨架 (它来源于std::allocator),我认为这是一个很好的开始 指向写自己的分配器。请随意使用这段代码 以任何你想要的方式:

#include <memory>
#include <stdio.h>

namespace mmap_allocator_namespace
{
        // See StackOverflow replies to this answer for important commentary about inheriting from std::allocator before replicating this code.
        template <typename T>
        class mmap_allocator: public std::allocator<T>
        {
public:
                typedef size_t size_type;
                typedef T* pointer;
                typedef const T* const_pointer;

                template<typename _Tp1>
                struct rebind
                {
                        typedef mmap_allocator<_Tp1> other;
                };

                pointer allocate(size_type n, const void *hint=0)
                {
                        fprintf(stderr, "Alloc %d bytes.\n", n*sizeof(T));
                        return std::allocator<T>::allocate(n, hint);
                }

                void deallocate(pointer p, size_type n)
                {
                        fprintf(stderr, "Dealloc %d bytes (%p).\n", n*sizeof(T), p);
                        return std::allocator<T>::deallocate(p, n);
                }

                mmap_allocator() throw(): std::allocator<T>() { fprintf(stderr, "Hello allocator!\n"); }
                mmap_allocator(const mmap_allocator &a) throw(): std::allocator<T>(a) { }
                template <class U>                    
                mmap_allocator(const mmap_allocator<U> &a) throw(): std::allocator<T>(a) { }
                ~mmap_allocator() throw() { }
        };
}

为了使用它,像下面这样声明一个STL容器:

using namespace std;
using namespace mmap_allocator_namespace;

vector<int, mmap_allocator<int> > int_vec(1024, 0, mmap_allocator<int>());

例如,每当分配内存时,就可以使用它记录日志。什么是必要的 是重新绑定结构,否则向量容器使用超类分配/释放 方法。

更新:内存映射分配器现在可以在https://github.com/johannesthoma/mmap_allocator上获得,并且是LGPL。您可以在项目中使用它。

自定义分配器可以发挥作用的一个领域是游戏开发,特别是在游戏机上,因为它们只有少量内存,没有交换空间。在这样的系统上,您要确保对每个子系统都有严格的控制,这样一个不重要的系统就不能从一个重要的系统窃取内存。池分配器等其他功能可以帮助减少内存碎片。你可以在这里找到一篇关于这个主题的详细的长篇论文:

EASTL—Electronic Arts标准模板库

I personally use Loki::Allocator / SmallObject to optimize memory usage for small objects — it show good efficiency and satisfying performance if you have to work with moderate amounts of really small objects (1 to 256 bytes). It can be up to ~30 times more efficient than standard C++ new/delete allocation if we talk about allocating moderate amounts of small objects of many different sizes. Also, there's a VC-specific solution called "QuickHeap", it brings best possible performance (allocate and deallocate operations just read and write the address of the block being allocated/returned to heap, respectively in up to 99.(9)% cases — depends on settings and initialization), but at a cost of a notable overhead — it needs two pointers per extent and one extra for each new memory block. It's a fastest possible solution for working with huge (10 000++) amounts of objects being created and deleted if you don't need a big variety of object sizes (it creates an individual pool for each object size, from 1 to 1023 bytes in current implementation, so initialization costs may belittle the overall performance boost, but one can go ahead and allocate/deallocate some dummy objects before the application enters it's performance-critical phase(s)).

标准的c++ new/delete实现的问题是,它通常只是C malloc/free分配的包装器,它适用于较大的内存块,比如1024+字节。它在性能方面有显著的开销,有时还会占用额外的内存用于映射。因此,在大多数情况下,自定义分配器的实现方式是最大化性能和/或最小化分配小对象(≤1024字节)所需的额外内存量。