抽象方法和虚拟方法有什么区别?在哪些情况下,建议使用抽象方法或虚拟方法?哪一种是最好的方法?


当前回答

在这里,我写了一些示例代码,希望这可能是一个非常实际的例子,可以从非常基本的层面上看到接口、抽象类和普通类的行为。如果您想将其用作演示,也可以在github中找到此代码作为项目:https://github.com/usavas/JavaAbstractAndInterfaceDemo

public interface ExampleInterface {

//    public void MethodBodyInInterfaceNotPossible(){
//    }
    void MethodInInterface();

}

public abstract class AbstractClass {
    public abstract void AbstractMethod();

    //    public abstract void AbstractMethodWithBodyNotPossible(){
    //
    //    };

    //Standard Method CAN be declared in AbstractClass
    public void StandardMethod(){
        System.out.println("Standard Method in AbstractClass (super) runs");
    }
}

public class ConcreteClass
    extends AbstractClass
    implements ExampleInterface{

    //Abstract Method HAS TO be IMPLEMENTED in child class. Implemented by ConcreteClass
    @Override
    public void AbstractMethod() {
        System.out.println("AbstractMethod overridden runs");
    }

    //Standard Method CAN be OVERRIDDEN.
    @Override
    public void StandardMethod() {
        super.StandardMethod();
        System.out.println("StandardMethod overridden in ConcreteClass runs");
    }

    public void ConcreteMethod(){
        System.out.println("Concrete method runs");
    }

    //A method in interface HAS TO be IMPLEMENTED in implementer class.
    @Override
    public void MethodInInterface() {
        System.out.println("MethodInInterface Implemented by ConcreteClass runs");

    //    Cannot declare abstract method in a concrete class
    //    public abstract void AbstractMethodDeclarationInConcreteClassNotPossible(){
    //
    //    }
    }
}

其他回答

抽象函数“只是”签名,没有实现。它在接口中用于声明如何使用类。它必须在其中一个派生类中实现。

虚函数(实际上是方法)也是您声明的函数,应该在继承层次结构类之一中实现。

此类类的继承实例也继承实现,除非您在较低层次结构类中实现它。

我在一些地方看到抽象方法的定义如下**

“必须在子类中实现抽象方法”

**我觉得是这样。

如果子类也是抽象的,则不必在子类中实现抽象方法。。

1) 抽象方法不能是私有方法。2) 抽象方法不能在同一抽象类中实现。

我会说。。如果我们要实现一个抽象类,您必须重写基础抽象类中的抽象方法。因为使用重写关键字实现抽象方法。类似于虚拟方法。

虚拟方法不必在继承类中实现。

                                 ----------CODE--------------

public abstract class BaseClass
{
    public int MyProperty { get; set; }
    protected abstract void MyAbstractMethod();

    public virtual void MyVirtualMethod()
    {
        var x = 3 + 4;
    }

}
public abstract class myClassA : BaseClass
{
    public int MyProperty { get; set; }
    //not necessary to implement an abstract method if the child class is also abstract.

    protected override void MyAbstractMethod()
    {
        throw new NotImplementedException();
    }
}
public class myClassB : BaseClass
{
    public int MyProperty { get; set; }
    //You must have to implement the abstract method since this class is not an abstract class.

    protected override void MyAbstractMethod()
    {
        throw new NotImplementedException();
    }
}

抽象函数不能具有功能。你基本上是说,任何子类都必须给出自己版本的这个方法,但是它太通用了,甚至无法在父类中实现。

一个虚拟函数,基本上就是说,看,这里的功能对于子类来说可能不够好,也可能不够好。因此,如果它足够好,请使用此方法,如果不好,请重写我,并提供您自己的功能。

抽象函数没有实现,只能在抽象类上声明。这迫使派生类提供实现。

虚拟函数提供默认实现,它可以存在于抽象类或非抽象类上。

例如:

public abstract class myBase
{
    //If you derive from this class you must implement this method. notice we have no method body here either
    public abstract void YouMustImplement();

    //If you derive from this class you can change the behavior but are not required to
    public virtual void YouCanOverride()
    { 
    }
}

public class MyBase
{
   //This will not compile because you cannot have an abstract method in a non-abstract class
    public abstract void YouMustImplement();
}

我通过对以下课程(从其他答案)进行一些改进,使这一点更简单:

using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;

namespace TestOO
{
    class Program
    {
        static void Main(string[] args)
        {
            BaseClass _base = new BaseClass();
            Console.WriteLine("Calling virtual method directly");
            _base.SayHello();
            Console.WriteLine("Calling single method directly");
            _base.SayGoodbye();

            DerivedClass _derived = new DerivedClass();
            Console.WriteLine("Calling new method from derived class");
            _derived.SayHello();
            Console.WriteLine("Calling overrided method from derived class");
            _derived.SayGoodbye();

            DerivedClass2 _derived2 = new DerivedClass2();
            Console.WriteLine("Calling new method from derived2 class");
            _derived2.SayHello();
            Console.WriteLine("Calling overrided method from derived2 class");
            _derived2.SayGoodbye();
            Console.ReadLine();
        }
    }


    public class BaseClass
    {
        public void SayHello()
        {
            Console.WriteLine("Hello\n");
        }
        public virtual void SayGoodbye()
        {
            Console.WriteLine("Goodbye\n");
        }

        public void HelloGoodbye()
        {
            this.SayHello();
            this.SayGoodbye();
        }
    }


    public abstract class AbstractClass
    {
        public void SayHello()
        {
            Console.WriteLine("Hello\n");
        }


        //public virtual void SayGoodbye()
        //{
        //    Console.WriteLine("Goodbye\n");
        //}
        public abstract void SayGoodbye();
    }


    public class DerivedClass : BaseClass
    {
        public new void SayHello()
        {
            Console.WriteLine("Hi There");
        }

        public override void SayGoodbye()
        {
            Console.WriteLine("See you later");
        }
    }

    public class DerivedClass2 : AbstractClass
    {
        public new void SayHello()
        {
            Console.WriteLine("Hi There");
        }
        // We should use the override keyword with abstract types
        //public new void SayGoodbye()
        //{
        //    Console.WriteLine("See you later2");
        //}
        public override void SayGoodbye()
        {
            Console.WriteLine("See you later");
        }
    }
}