我在Bash中有一个字符串:
string="My string"
如何测试它是否包含另一个字符串?
if [ $string ?? 'foo' ]; then
echo "It's there!"
fi
哪里是我不认识的接线员。我使用echo和grep吗?
if echo "$string" | grep 'foo'; then
echo "It's there!"
fi
这看起来有点笨拙。
我在Bash中有一个字符串:
string="My string"
如何测试它是否包含另一个字符串?
if [ $string ?? 'foo' ]; then
echo "It's there!"
fi
哪里是我不认识的接线员。我使用echo和grep吗?
if echo "$string" | grep 'foo'; then
echo "It's there!"
fi
这看起来有点笨拙。
当前回答
因此,这个问题有很多有用的解决方案——但哪一个最快/使用的资源最少?
使用此框架重复测试:
/usr/bin/time bash -c 'a=two;b=onetwothree; x=100000; while [ $x -gt 0 ]; do TEST ; x=$(($x-1)); done'
每次更换测试:
[[ $b =~ $a ]] 2.92 user 0.06 system 0:02.99 elapsed 99% CPU
[ "${b/$a//}" = "$b" ] 3.16 user 0.07 system 0:03.25 elapsed 99% CPU
[[ $b == *$a* ]] 1.85 user 0.04 system 0:01.90 elapsed 99% CPU
case $b in *$a):;;esac 1.80 user 0.02 system 0:01.83 elapsed 99% CPU
doContain $a $b 4.27 user 0.11 system 0:04.41 elapsed 99%CPU
(doContain在F.Houri的回答中)
对于傻笑:
echo $b|grep -q $a 12.68 user 30.86 system 3:42.40 elapsed 19% CPU !ouch!
因此,无论是在扩展测试还是案例中,简单的替代选项都可以预测地获胜。这个箱子是便携式的。
输出到100000 greps是可想而知的痛苦!关于无需使用外部实用程序的旧规则是正确的。
其他回答
公认的答案是正确的,但很难阅读和理解。对于与搜索相关的问题,应始终使用$needle in a$haystack习语。由于建议的编辑队列已满,我发布了以下内容:
haystack='There are needles here.'
if [[ "$haystack" == *"needle"* ]]; then
echo "It's there!"
fi
您可以使用逻辑&&以更紧凑
#!/bin/bash
# NO MATCH EXAMPLE
string="test"
[[ "$string" == *"foo"* ]] && {
echo "YES"
}
# MATCH EXAMPLE
string="tefoost"
[[ "$string" == *"foo"* ]] && {
echo "YES"
}
正如Paul在绩效比较中提到的:
if echo "abcdefg" | grep -q "bcdef"; then
echo "String contains is true."
else
echo "String contains is not true."
fi
这是符合POSIX的,就像Marcus提供的答案中的“case“$string”一样,但它比case语句答案更容易阅读。还要注意,这将比使用case语句慢得多。正如保罗所指出的,不要在循环中使用它。
字符串包含变量(兼容或不区分大小写)
由于这些Stack Overflow的答案主要讲述了Bash,我在这篇文章的底部发布了一个独立于大小写的Bash函数。。。
总之,有我的
兼容答案
由于已经有很多使用Bash特定功能的答案,因此有一种方法可以在功能较差的shell下工作,例如BusyBox:
[ -z "${string##*$reqsubstr*}" ]
在实践中,这可能会:
string='echo "My string"'
for reqsubstr in 'o "M' 'alt' 'str';do
if [ -z "${string##*$reqsubstr*}" ] ;then
echo "String '$string' contain substring: '$reqsubstr'."
else
echo "String '$string' don't contain substring: '$reqsubstr'."
fi
done
这是在Bash、Dash、KornShell(ksh)和ash(BusyBox)下测试的,结果总是:
String 'echo "My string"' contain substring: 'o "M'.
String 'echo "My string"' don't contain substring: 'alt'.
String 'echo "My string"' contain substring: 'str'.
集成到一个函数中
正如@EeroAaltonen所问,这里是相同演示的一个版本,在相同的外壳下测试:
myfunc() {
reqsubstr="$1"
shift
string="$@"
if [ -z "${string##*$reqsubstr*}" ] ;then
echo "String '$string' contain substring: '$reqsubstr'.";
else
echo "String '$string' don't contain substring: '$reqsubstr'."
fi
}
然后:
$ myfunc 'o "M' 'echo "My String"'
String 'echo "My String"' contain substring 'o "M'.
$ myfunc 'alt' 'echo "My String"'
String 'echo "My String"' don't contain substring 'alt'.
注意:必须转义或双引号和/或双引号:
$ myfunc 'o "M' echo "My String"
String 'echo My String' don't contain substring: 'o "M'.
$ myfunc 'o "M' echo \"My String\"
String 'echo "My String"' contain substring: 'o "M'.
简单的功能
这是在BusyBox、Dash和Bash下测试的:
stringContain() { [ -z "${2##*$1*}" ]; }
现在:
$ if stringContain 'o "M3' 'echo "My String"';then echo yes;else echo no;fi
no
$ if stringContain 'o "M' 'echo "My String"';then echo yes;else echo no;fi
yes
…或者,如果提交的字符串可能为空,如@Sjlver所指出的,则函数将变为:
stringContain() { [ -z "${2##*$1*}" ] && [ -z "$1" -o -n "$2" ]; }
或者正如Adrian Günter的评论所建议的,避免使用-o开关:
stringContain() { [ -z "${2##*$1*}" ] && { [ -z "$1" ] || [ -n "$2" ];};}
最终(简单)功能:
并反转测试以使其可能更快:
stringContain() { [ -z "$1" ] || { [ -z "${2##*$1*}" ] && [ -n "$2" ];};}
对于空字符串:
$ if stringContain '' ''; then echo yes; else echo no; fi
yes
$ if stringContain 'o "M' ''; then echo yes; else echo no; fi
no
独立于大小写(仅限Bash!)
对于不区分大小写的字符串测试,只需将每个字符串转换为小写:
stringContain() {
local _lc=${2,,}
[ -z "$1" ] || { [ -z "${_lc##*${1,,}*}" ] && [ -n "$2" ] ;} ;}
检查:
stringContain 'o "M3' 'echo "my string"' && echo yes || echo no
no
stringContain 'o "My' 'echo "my string"' && echo yes || echo no
yes
if stringContain '' ''; then echo yes; else echo no; fi
yes
if stringContain 'o "M' ''; then echo yes; else echo no; fi
no
我使用这个函数(一个不包括但很明显的依赖项)。它通过了以下测试。如果函数返回值>0,则找到字符串。你也可以很容易地返回1或0。
function str_instr {
# Return position of ```str``` within ```string```.
# >>> str_instr "str" "string"
# str: String to search for.
# string: String to search.
typeset str string x
# Behavior here is not the same in bash vs ksh unless we escape special characters.
str="$(str_escape_special_characters "${1}")"
string="${2}"
x="${string%%$str*}"
if [[ "${x}" != "${string}" ]]; then
echo "${#x} + 1" | bc -l
else
echo 0
fi
}
function test_str_instr {
str_instr "(" "'foo@host (dev,web)'" | assert_eq 11
str_instr ")" "'foo@host (dev,web)'" | assert_eq 19
str_instr "[" "'foo@host [dev,web]'" | assert_eq 11
str_instr "]" "'foo@host [dev,web]'" | assert_eq 19
str_instr "a" "abc" | assert_eq 1
str_instr "z" "abc" | assert_eq 0
str_instr "Eggs" "Green Eggs And Ham" | assert_eq 7
str_instr "a" "" | assert_eq 0
str_instr "" "" | assert_eq 0
str_instr " " "Green Eggs" | assert_eq 6
str_instr " " " Green " | assert_eq 1
}