注意:此方法使用未文档化的Node.js内部构件，可以在没有警告的情况下进行更改。

在Node中，你可以使用process.binding('util')来同步确定promise的状态。getPromiseDetails(/* promise */);

这将返回:

[0，]表示未决，

[1， /* value */]表示已实现，或

[2， /* value */]表示拒绝。

const pending = new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(() => resolve('yakko')));;
const fulfilled = Promise.resolve('wakko');
const rejected = Promise.reject('dot');

[pending, fulfilled, rejected].forEach(promise => {
  console.log(process.binding('util').getPromiseDetails(promise));
});

// pending:   [0, ]
// fulfilled: [1, 'wakko']
// rejected:  [2, 'dot']

将其包装到一个helper函数中:

const getStatus = promise => ['pending', 'fulfilled', 'rejected'][
  process.binding('util').getPromiseDetails(promise)[0]
];

getStatus(pending); // pending
getStatus(fulfilled); // fulfilled
getStatus(rejected); // rejected

This is older question but I was trying to do something similar. I need to keep n workers going. They are structured in a promise. I need to scan and see if they are resolved, rejected or still pending. If resolved, I need the value, if rejected do something to correct the issue or pending. If resolved or rejected I need to start another task to keep n going. I can't figure a way to do it with Promise.all or Promise.race as I keep working promises in an array and can find no way to delete them. So I create a worker that does the trick

我需要一个承诺生成器函数，返回一个承诺，根据需要解决或拒绝。它由一个函数调用，该函数设置框架以了解承诺在做什么。

在下面的代码中，生成器只是返回一个基于setTimeout的承诺。

在这里

//argObj should be of form
// {succeed: <true or false, nTimer: <desired time out>}
function promiseGenerator(argsObj) {
  let succeed = argsObj.succeed;          
  let nTimer = argsObj.nTimer;
  return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
    setTimeout(() => {
      if (succeed) {
        resolve('ok');
      }
      else {
        reject(`fail`);
      }
    }, nTimer);
  })

}

function doWork(generatorargs) {
  let sp = { state: `pending`, value: ``, promise: "" };
  let p1 = promiseGenerator(generatorargs)
    .then((value) => {
      sp.state = "resolved";
      sp.value = value;
    })
    .catch((err) => {
      sp.state = "rejected";
      sp.value = err;
    })
  sp.promise = p1;
  return sp;
}

doWork返回一个包含promise及其状态和返回值的对象。

下面的代码运行一个循环，测试状态并创建新的工作线程以保持在3个正在运行的工作线程。

let promiseArray = [];

promiseArray.push(doWork({ succeed: true, nTimer: 1000 }));
promiseArray.push(doWork({ succeed: true, nTimer: 500 }));
promiseArray.push(doWork({ succeed: false, nTimer: 3000 }));

function loopTimerPromise(delay) {
  return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
    setTimeout(() => {
      resolve('ok');
    }, delay)
  })
}

async function looper() {
  let nPromises = 3;      //just for breaking loop
  let nloop = 0;          //just for breaking loop
  let i;
  //let continueLoop = true;
  while (true) {
    await loopTimerPromise(900);  //execute loop every 900ms
    nloop++;
    //console.log(`promiseArray.length = ${promiseArray.length}`);
    for (i = promiseArray.length; i--; i > -1) {
      console.log(`index ${i} state: ${promiseArray[i].state}`);
      switch (promiseArray[i].state) {
        case "pending":
          break;
        case "resolved":
          nPromises++;
          promiseArray.splice(i, 1);
          promiseArray.push(doWork({ succeed: true, nTimer: 1000 }));
          break;
        case "rejected":
          //take recovery action
          nPromises++;
          promiseArray.splice(i, 1);
          promiseArray.push(doWork({ succeed: false, nTimer: 500 }));
          break;
        default:
          console.log(`error bad state in i=${i} state:${promiseArray[i].state} `)
          break;
      }
    }
    console.log(``);
    if (nloop > 10 || nPromises > 10) {
      //should do a Promise.all on remaining promises to clean them up but not for test
      break;
    }
  }
}

looper();

在node.js中测试

顺便说一句，不是在这个问题上，而是在其他类似的问题上，我讨厌有人说“你不明白”或“事情不是这样的”，我通常认为提问者知道他们想要什么。建议一个更好的方法是很好的。耐心地解释承诺如何起作用也会很好。

还有另一种优雅而俗气的方法来检查一个promise是否仍然挂起，只需将整个对象转换为字符串，并在inspect的帮助下检查它，就像这样:util.inspect(myPromise).includes("pending")。

在Node.js 8、9、10、11、12、13上测试

这里有一个完整的例子

const util = require("util")

function sleep(ms) {
  return new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, ms));
}

(async ()=>{
  let letmesleep = sleep(3000)
  setInterval(()=>{
    console.log(util.inspect(letmesleep).includes("pending"))
  },1000)
})()

结果:

true
true
false
false
false

老问题有很多答案，但似乎没有一个建议我认为是最简单的解决方案:在承诺解决/拒绝上设置bool指示器。

类Promise2 { 构造函数(args) { let promise = new promise(…args); promise.then(() => promise。_resolved_ = true); promise.catch(() => promise。_rejected_ = true); 返回的诺言; ｝ ｝ let p = new promise (r => setTimeout(r, 3000)); setInterval(() => { Console.log('正在同步检查p是否已解析?”,p._resolved_); }, 1000);

这里是一个更充实的QueryablePromise的es6版本，允许在第一次解析后进行链接和捕获，并立即解析或拒绝以保持api与本机Promise一致。

const PROMISE = Symbol('PROMISE') const tap = fn => x => (fn(x), x) const trace = label => tap(x => console.log(label, x)) class QueryablePromise { resolved = false rejected = false fulfilled = false catchFns = [] constructor(fn) { this[PROMISE] = new Promise(fn) .then(tap(() => { this.fulfilled = true this.resolved = true })) .catch(x => { this.fulfilled = true this.rejected = true return Promise.reject(x) }) } then(fn) { this[PROMISE].then(fn) return this } catch(fn) { this[PROMISE].catch(fn) return this } static resolve(x) { return new QueryablePromise((res) => res(x)) } static reject(x) { return new QueryablePromise((_, rej) => rej(x)) } } const resolvedPromise = new QueryablePromise((res) => { setTimeout(res, 200, 'resolvedPromise') }) const rejectedPromise = new QueryablePromise((_, rej) => { setTimeout(rej, 200, 'rejectedPromise') }) // ensure our promises have not been fulfilled console.log('test 1 before: is resolved', resolvedPromise.resolved) console.log('test 2 before: is rejected', rejectedPromise.rejected) setTimeout(() => { // check to see the resolved status of our promise console.log('test 1 after: is resolved', resolvedPromise.resolved) console.log('test 2 after: is rejected', rejectedPromise.rejected) }, 300) // make sure we can immediately resolve a QueryablePromise const immediatelyResolvedPromise = QueryablePromise.resolve('immediatelyResolvedPromise') // ensure we can chain then .then(trace('test 3 resolved')) .then(trace('test 3 resolved 2')) .catch(trace('test 3 rejected')) // make sure we can immediately reject a QueryablePromise const immediatelyRejectedPromise = QueryablePromise.reject('immediatelyRejectedPromise') .then(trace('test 4 resolved')) .catch(trace('test 4 rejected')) <script src="https://codepen.io/synthet1c/pen/KyQQmL.js"></script>

更新:2019

Bluebird.js提供了这个:http://bluebirdjs.com/docs/api/isfulfilled.html

var Promise = require("bluebird");
let p = Promise.resolve();
console.log(p.isFulfilled());

如果您更喜欢创建自己的包装器，这里有一个关于它的不错的博客。

因为JavaScript是单线程的，所以很难找到一个足够常见的用例来证明将其放在规范中是正确的。知道承诺是否被解决的最佳位置是在.then()中。测试Promise是否被履行将创建一个轮询循环，这很可能是错误的方向。

如果你想同步推理异步代码，Async /await是一个很好的结构。

await this();
await that();
return 'success!';

另一个有用的调用是Promise.all()

var promise1 = Promise.resolve(3);
var promise2 = 42;
var promise3 = new Promise(function(resolve, reject) {
  setTimeout(resolve, 100, 'foo');
});

Promise.all([promise1, promise2, promise3]).then(function(values) {
  console.log(values);
});
// expected output: Array [3, 42, "foo"]

当我第一次得到这个答案时，这就是我正在寻找的用例。