我有一个纯JavaScript承诺(内置实现或poly-fill):
var promise = new promise(函数(解析，拒绝){/*…* /});
从规范来看，Promise可以是:
" settle "和" resolved " “解决”和“拒绝” “等待”
我有一个用例，我希望同步审问承诺并确定:
承诺达成了吗? 如果是，承诺解决了吗?
我知道我可以使用#then()来安排在Promise改变状态后异步执行的工作。我不是在问你该怎么做。
这个问题是关于Promise状态的同步询问。我怎样才能做到这一点呢?
当前回答
在节点中，写入未记录的内部进程。
> process.binding('util').getPromiseDetails(Promise.resolve({data: [1,2,3]}));
[ 1, { data: [ 1, 2, 3 ] } ]
> process.binding('util').getPromiseDetails(Promise.reject(new Error('no')));
[ 2, Error: no ]
> process.binding('util').getPromiseDetails(new Promise((resolve) => {}));
[ 0, <1 empty item> ]
其他回答
不，没有同步API，但这是我的async承诺(在@Matthijs的帮助下):
函数promiseState(p) { Const t = {}; 回报的承诺。种族([p t]) .then(v => (v == t)?"pending": " completed "， () => "rejected"); ｝ var a = Promise.resolve(); var b = Promise.reject(); var c = new Promise(() => {}); promiseState (a)。Then (state => console.log(state));/ /实现 promiseState (b)。Then (state => console.log(state));/ /拒绝 promiseState (c)。Then (state => console.log(state));/ /等待
在节点中，写入未记录的内部进程。
> process.binding('util').getPromiseDetails(Promise.resolve({data: [1,2,3]}));
[ 1, { data: [ 1, 2, 3 ] } ]
> process.binding('util').getPromiseDetails(Promise.reject(new Error('no')));
[ 2, Error: no ]
> process.binding('util').getPromiseDetails(new Promise((resolve) => {}));
[ 0, <1 empty item> ]
您可以扩展Promise类来创建一个新的可查询的Promise 类。
您可以通过继承本机可用的Promise类来创建自己的子类，比如QueryablePromise，它的实例上有一个可用的status属性，您可以使用该属性同步查询Promise对象的状态。它的实现可以在下面看到，或者参考这个来获得更好的解释。
class QueryablePromise extends Promise { constructor (executor) { super((resolve, reject) => executor( data => { resolve(data) this._status = 'Resolved' }, err => { reject(err) this._status = 'Rejected' }, )) this._status = 'Pending' } get status () { return this._status } } // Create a promise that resolves after 5 sec var myQueryablePromise = new QueryablePromise((resolve, reject) => { setTimeout(() => resolve(), 5000) }) // Log the status of the above promise every 500ms setInterval(() => { console.log(myQueryablePromise.status) }, 500)
这是我使用的将来模式:(https://github.com/Smallscript-Corp)
启用同步和异步fn使用 使事件模式与异步行为统一
class XPromise extends Promise {
state = 'pending'
get settled() {return(this.state !== 'pending')}
resolve(v,...a) {
this.state = 'resolved'
return(this.resolve_(this.value = v,...a))
}
reject(e,...a) {
this.state = 'rejected'
return(this.reject_(this.value = (e instanceof Error) ? e : XPromise.Error(e),...a))
}
static Error(e) {const v = Error('value-rejected'); v.value = e; return(v)}
static Future(fn,...args) { // FactoryFn
let r,t,fv = new XPromise((r_,t_) => {r=r_;t=t_})
fv.resolve_ = r; fv.reject_ = t;
switch(typeof fn) {
case 'undefined': break; case 'function': fn(fv,...args); break;
default: fv.resolve(fn)
}
return(fv)
}
}
global.Future = XPromise.Future
然后你可以创建可以使用同步和异步函数来解决的未来价值实例;支持统一处理事件。
你可以用它来写一个像这样的模式:
async doSomething() {
// Start both - logically async-parallel
const fvIsNetworkOnLine = this.fvIsNetworkOnline
const fvAuthToken = this.fvAuthToken
// await both (order not critical since both started/queued above)
await fvAuthToken
await fvIsNetworkOnLine
// ... we can check the future values here if needed `fv.resolved`, `fv.state` etc
// ... do dependent workflow here ...
}
onNetworkOnLine(fIsOnline) {
// We utilize the `fv.settled` below, and use the event to `settle` it etc
if(fIsOnline) {
if(this.fvNetworkAvailable_)
this.fvNetworkAvailable_.resolve(true)
this.fvNetworkAvailable_ = undefined
}
else if(this.fvNetworkAvailable_.settled) {
this.fvNetworkAvailable_ = undefined
}
}
get fvNetworkAvailable() {
if(navigator.onLine)
return true
else if(this.fvNetworkAvailable_)
return this.fvNetworkAvailable_
return (this.fvNetworkAvailable_ = Future())
}
get fvAuthToken() {
if(this.fvAuthToken_)
return this.fvAuthToken_
const authTokenFv = async fv => {
// ... handle retry logic etc here ...
}
return(this.fvAuthToken_ = Future(authTokenFv))
}
警告:process.binding(“跑龙套”)。节点16上的getPromiseDetails未定义!
基准:
候选人:
/**
* https://stackoverflow.com/a/47009572/5318303
*/
const isPromisePending1 = (() => { // noinspection JSUnresolvedFunction
const util = process.binding('util') // noinspection JSUnresolvedFunction
return promise => !util.getPromiseDetails(promise)[0]
})()
/**
* https://stackoverflow.com/a/35852666/5318303
*/
const isPromisePending2 = (promise) => util.inspect(promise) === 'Promise { <pending> }'
/**
* https://stackoverflow.com/a/35820220/5318303
*/
const isPromisePending3 = (promise) => {
const t = {}
return Promise.race([promise, t])
.then(v => v === t, () => false)
}
测试的承诺:
const a = Promise.resolve()
const b = Promise.reject()
const c = new Promise(() => {})
const x = (async () => 1)()
运行基准:
const n = 1000000
console.time('isPromisePending1')
for (let i = 0; i < n; i++) {
isPromisePending1(a)
isPromisePending1(b)
isPromisePending1(c)
isPromisePending1(x)
}
console.timeEnd('isPromisePending1')
console.time('isPromisePending2')
for (let i = 0; i < n; i++) {
isPromisePending2(a)
isPromisePending2(b)
isPromisePending2(c)
isPromisePending2(x)
}
console.timeEnd('isPromisePending2')
console.time('isPromisePending3')
for (let i = 0; i < n; i++) {
await isPromisePending3(a)
await isPromisePending3(b)
await isPromisePending3(c)
await isPromisePending3(x)
}
console.timeEnd('isPromisePending3')
结果:
isPromisePending1: 440.694ms
isPromisePending2: 3.354s
isPromisePending3: 4.761s
显然isPromisePending1()太快了(8~10倍)!但它在节点16上不可用!(见上述警告)。
